Cardiac Risk Assessment Using Standard of Care Versus CTA and Heart Flow FFRct (CRASCH-Liver)

February 28, 2023 updated by: Robert Safian, William Beaumont Hospitals

Cardiac Risk Assessment Using Standard of Care Versus CTA and Heart Flow FFRct in Patients With End-Stage Liver Disease Under Consideration for Liver Transplant.

Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) is the narrowing or blockage of the artery of the heart and is prevalent in end-stage liver disease. Consultation with cardiologist and stress tests are recommended to patients under consideration for liver transplant. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if Computed Tomography Angiogram (CTA) and CTA-derived Fractional Flow Reserve (FFRct) procedure influences decisions about further cardiac testing compared with Standard of Care (SOC) such as consultation by a cardiologist, Echocardiogram (ultrasound of the heart), Electrocardiogram (ECG) and stress tests.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to determine in end-stage liver disease patients whether non-invasive assessment of coronary artery disease prior to liver transplant using CTA (CTA) and CTA-derived Fractional Flow Reserved (FFRct) is superior to current standard of care (SOC) cardiovascular evaluation such as formal consultation by a cardiologist, electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, and pharmacological stress test such (e.g. Dobutamine stress echocardiogram and lexiscan myocardial perfusion imaging). The investigational portion of this study is the CTA and FFRct, which is a special x-ray scan that can identify blockages in the arteries and determine if blood flow is impaired. The CTA and FFRct will be done within 2 weeks after the standard of care evaluation.

All 100 patients will undergo standard of care stress test plus CTA/FFRct. The referring cardiologist will be blinded to the results of CTA/FFRct, and will make an "initial" recommendation based on the standard of care evaluation. After making the "initial" recommendation, the referring cardiologist will be unblinded to the CTA/FFRct results and make a "final" recommendation. The "initial" recommendation will consist of one of the following: further cardiac evaluation is not needed or cardiac catheterization is required. The "final" recommendation will consist of one of the following: further cardiac evaluation is not needed or cardiac catheterization is required. All patients will receive a 1 year phone follow up call.

The hypothesis is that in End Stage Liver Disease (ESLD) patients, non-invasive assessment for CAD using CTA/FFRct is superior to SOC cardiovascular evaluation (stress etst, echocardiogram, ECG). This study will look at the frequency of how often CTA/FFRct changed the clinical recommendation compared with the standard of care alone (Initial recommendation versus final recommendation).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Michigan
      • Royal Oak, Michigan, United States, 48073
        • William Beaumont Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with end-stage liver disease
  2. Patients undergoing cardiovascular risk assessment prior to liver transplantation -

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) < 30 cc/min/1.73 m^2 (unless patient is on dialysis or renal transplant is planned)
  2. Heart rate > 90 bpm despite beta blocker therapy
  3. Body Mass Index (BMI) > 40 plus chest obesity (i.e. truncal obesity and normal chest morphology is not an exclusion)
  4. Pregnant Women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Evaluation of Standard of care followed by CTA/FFRct
Patient received clinical recommendation based on the Standard of Care i.e 2 D echocardiogram, plus ECG, plus, pharmacological stress test followed by re-evaluation of clinical recommendation with addition of CTA/FFRct
Diagnostic test: CTA/FFRct
Computed Tomography Angiogram with Fractional Flow Reserve. A Ct scan of the heart's blood vessels.
Diagnostic test: SOC cardiovascular evaluation
Standard of care (SOC) cardiovascular evaluation i.e ECG, 2 D echocardiogram and pharmacologic stress test such as Dobutamine and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging stress test.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in clinical recommendation
Time Frame: within 2 weeks after SOC assessment
Number of Participants whose clinical recommendation as initially determined by SOC assessment is changed following CTA/FFRct assessment.
within 2 weeks after SOC assessment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Frequency of detecting Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) by CTA/FFRct
Time Frame: within 2 weeks after SOC assessment
Number of Participants with agreement in CAD status detected by both Pharmacological stress test and also CTA/FFRct.
within 2 weeks after SOC assessment
Cardiovascular morbidity
Time Frame: 1 year
Number of participants with cardiovascular related Death, Myocardial Infarction (MI: defined as any 2 of following; 1. ischemic chest pain, 2. elevated troponin 3. pathologic Q waves or ischemic ST changes), or ischemia driven revascularization
1 year
Projected Health Care Cost
Time Frame: within 2 weeks after SOC assessment
Dollar value of Standard of care treatment (related to CAD) and CTA/FFRct
within 2 weeks after SOC assessment
Frequency of Detecting Myocardial Ischemia and the frequency of detecting the correct territory of the Myocardial Ischemia.
Time Frame: within 2 weeks after SOC assessment
Number of participants with Myocardial Ischemia and correct territory of Myocardial Ischemia detected by Pharmacological Stress Test vs CTA/FFRct
within 2 weeks after SOC assessment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
William Beaumont Hospitals

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 12, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 12, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 2, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 28, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2019-151

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings