Concurrent Assessment of Skeletal Muscle Mass and Synthesis/Breakdown in Old Age

March 24, 2020 updated by: University of Nottingham

Concurrent Assessment of Skeletal Muscle Mass and Synthesis/Breakdown in Old Age: Defining Diagnostics and the Aetiology of Sarcopenia to Identify "At-risk" Individuals and Appropriate Countermeasures

This study involves minimally-invasive techniques to measure muscle mass, muscle protein breakdown and synthesis simultaneously in older age.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Most people will have noticed that with age people become frail. This is principally due to wasting of skeletal muscle known as "sarcopenia". Crucially, sarcopenia is more than just a symptom of weakness and poor functional capacity; it exposes people to an increased risk of falls and fractures, impacting quality of life, independence, health status and ultimately lifespan. Muscles represent the largest organ in the body, making up over 50% of total body weight. Most people know that skeletal muscles are important for movement and to support the skeleton, but not everyone is aware of how important muscles are for whole-body health. For example, muscles represent a vast protein store containing amino acids (the building blocks of protein) which can be broken down in times of fasting, infection and disease in order to provide energy to help other vital organs. Because of the detrimental effects on health, and the associated health costs, sarcopenia is of grave concern. Therefore, there is a significant clinical need to pre-identify at-risk older individuals who have low muscle mass so that they can be offered an intervention (of diet, exercise or drug-based) before they suffer any of the potential problems outlined above. Current techniques for measuring whole-body muscle mass, including MRI and CT are time-consuming, expensive and in huge demand in hospital settings, meaning that muscle wasting conditions such as sarcopenia often go undiagnosed. In this project we propose a potential solution to this problem by developing a diagnostic of sarcopenia that requires only a single drink and subsequent urine collection. In addition, throughout this project we aim to explore the mechanisms underlying muscle wasting by assessing the muscle of those with low and 'normal' muscle mass.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
37

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
    • Derbyshire
      • Derby, Derbyshire, United Kingdom, DE22 3DT
        • Royal Derby Hospital Medical School

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 85 years (OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Generally healthy older adults

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Healthy volunteers of normal body mass index (BMI <35 kg/m2), aged 65-85 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A BMI > 35 kg/m2

  • Active cardiovascular disease:

    o angina, heart failure (class III/IV), arrhythmia, right to left cardiac shunt, recent cardiac event

  • Cerebrovascular disease:

    o previous stroke, aneurysm (large vessel or intracranial), epilepsy

  • Respiratory disease including:

    o pulmonary hypertension, COPD

  • Metabolic disease:

    o hyper and hypo parathyroidism, untreated hyper and hypothyroidism, Cushing's disease, type 1 or 2 diabetes

  • Active inflammatory bowel or renal disease
  • Malignancy
  • Recent steroid treatment (within 6 months) or hormone replacement therapy
  • Clotting dysfunction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measurement of D3-Creatine in Urine: 24 hours
Time Frame: Up to 24 hours
To use 30mg of D3-Creatine to measure muscle creatine pool size (g) and whole-body muscle mass (kg) from urine samples taken between 0 and 72 hours. The 0-24 hours collection provides a measure of creatine spillover.
Up to 24 hours
Measurement of muscle mass using D3-Creatine: 48 hours
Time Frame: 48 hours
To use 30mg of D3-Creatine to measure muscle creatine pool size (g) and whole-body muscle mass (kg) from urine samples taken between 0 and 72 hours. The 0-24 hours collection provides a measure of creatine spillover, spot urines at 48 and 72 hours provide a measurement of the dilution of tracer in urinary creatinine and thus the total muscle creatine pool size.
48 hours
Measurement of muscle mass using D3-Creatine: 72 hours
Time Frame: 72 hours
To use 30mg of D3-Creatine to measure muscle creatine pool size (g) and whole-body muscle mass (kg) from urine samples taken between 0 and 72 hours. The 0-24 hours collection provides a measure of creatine spillover, spot urines at 48 and 72 hours provide a measurement of the dilution of tracer in urinary creatinine and thus the total muscle creatine pool size.
72 hours
Rate of dilution of D3-3MH by endogenous unlabelled 3MH release in blood
Time Frame: 6 hours (from 24 through to 30 hours)
Using 10mg of D3-3-methylhistidine (D3-3MH) and subsequent multiple blood sampling between 24 and 30h, the rate of dilution of D3-3MH by endogenous unlabelled 3MH release provides a measure of the rate of whole-body muscle protein breakdown.
6 hours (from 24 through to 30 hours)
Rates of Muscle Protein Synthesis
Time Frame: 3 days
Using D2O, rate of muscle protein synthesis will be calculated, cumulatively, over 0-3 days by measuring deuterium labelling of alanine into protein from a muscle biopsy at 72 hours.
3 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Nottingham

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Abbeyfield

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 7, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 31, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 5, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 1, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 3, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 24, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Abbeyfield

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings