Treatments of Mal de Debarquement Syndrome (MdDS) by Habituation of Velocity Storage

December 12, 2023 updated by: Sergei Yakushin, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Mal de Debarquement Syndrome (MdDS) is an under-recognized but nevertheless common balance disorder, which in most cases occurs after exposure to prolonged passive motion. The current treatment approaches focus on reducing symptoms, but they can be retriggered. This project aims to shift the focus of MdDS treatment to permanently eliminating the symptom trigger while also minimizing symptoms.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Mal de Debarquement Syndrome (MdDS) is an under-recognized but nevertheless common balance disorder, primarily manifested by constant self-motion sensations consisting of rocking/swaying or gravitational pull of the body, which are accompanied by fatigue, migraine, hypersensitivity to light/noise/crowds, visually induced dizziness, and cognitive dysfunctions. As the name implies ("disembarkation sickness"), in most cases MdDS occurs after exposure to prolonged passive motion, specified as motion-triggered (MT) MdDS. However, the symptoms of MdDS can also occur without a motion trigger, termed as spontaneous MdDS. MdDS is debilitating and entails various mental health issues, such as suicidal thoughts, depression, and anxiety. Treatments for this disorder are still limited, as the specific underlying pathophysiology remains unclear. Recently, the team developed the first treatment method that can safely and effectively ease MdDS symptoms in the majority of patients via readaptation of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). The hypothesis underlying this treatment is that MdDS is caused by maladaptation of the functional component of the VOR called velocity storage, whose readaptation can be stimulated by exposure to whole-field visual motion coupled with head tilts. Over the past several years, more than 500 patients from around the world have been treated with this method. The success rate immediately after this treatment is 75% for MT MdDS, but some patients report return of symptoms after subsequent flights or prolonged car rides. Thus, the effectiveness of the current MdDS treatment protocol can depend on a serious practical limitation of needing to permanently avoid transportation. Building on the previous hypothesis of velocity storage maladaptation, the study team currently hypothesizes that another method, based on the reduction (habituation) of the velocity storage, can also resolve MdDS symptoms. Velocity storage can be greatly habituated within 4-5 days using a protocol previously developed in the study team's laboratory to reduce susceptibility to motion sickness. Preliminary data support the application of this protocol to MdDS. Moreover, since animal-based research suggests that velocity storage habituation is permanently retained, the study team further hypothesizes that this new treatment method yields robust long-term outcomes. In this project, 50 MT MdDS patients with otherwise normal vestibular and neurological functions will be randomly assigned into two groups, one to be treated by velocity storage habituation and the other by readaptation. Patients will be followed up for 6 months. Based on the preliminary data, the study team expects both groups to yield similar initial success rates for symptom improvement. However, the study team expects the group undergoing the habituation protocol to better retain the initial treatment impact in the long term. This project will significantly impact the MdDS treatment practice. The current approach focuses on reducing symptoms, but they can be retriggered by another prolonged exposure to passive motion. The habituation approach on the other hand focuses on permanently minimizing the symptom trigger while also minimizing symptoms. This project will also increase the current understanding of recurrent MdDS.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
47

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Vestibular Testing Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Age 18-78.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patient with serious spinal, neck and legs injuries will be excluded, since postural ability is essential for both treatments.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR)
Treatment by re-adaptation of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) for participants with motion triggered MdDS
Device: re-adaptation of the vestibulo-ocular reflex
The VOR will be readapted by activating velocity storage with full-field optokinetic motion at 5°/s in a set direction while the head is oscillated with a set frequency and direction. The readaptation training will be conducted in repeated modules, each lasting for 1-5 min. The expected duration of daily sessions varies from 30 to 90 min. A day's session will be terminated if patient no longer feel symptoms of MdDS.
Experimental: Habituation of velocity storage
Participants with motion triggered MdDS
Device: Habituation of velocity storage of the vestibulo-ocular reflex
The central (velocity storage) time constant will be reduced by inducing cancellation of two velocity storage-mediated responses: OKN and the VOR. Sinusoidal rotation at 0.017 Hz (1 revolution/min) in darkness advances the slow phase eye velocity of the VOR by 32º. In contrast, the OKN at this frequency has no phase advancement. Thus, to counteract the VOR by OKN, the optokinetic stimulus should be set to 32º phase advance the out of phased head rotation stimulus. Since the conflict stimulus is expected to be overwhelming to patients at higher chair velocities, subjects will be first trained with a 10°/s stimulus. In a previous study, no complaints were reported when subjects were tested at such low velocities. Preliminary testing show signs of symptom improvement when the peak velocity reached 30°/s to 40°/s.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective Symptoms Self-report of Overall Severity
Time Frame: During treatment (Day 1), Day 5, and 6 month follow up
The overall severity of MdDS-related symptoms was subjectively reported on a single 11-point scale of 0-10, where the score 0 indicated no symptoms and 10 the most difficult of combined symptoms that the patient subject could imagine. Higher score indicates poorer health outcomes. Among the symptoms to consider were: brain fog, head pressure, fullness of ear, heavy head, headache, nausea, blurry vision, fatigue, sensitivity to fluorescent lights, scrolling of computer screen, sensitivity to smell, sensitivity to noise, walking on trampoline, sensation of gravitational pull up or down. Subjects were trained to estimate the level of symptoms to minimize inconsistency.
During treatment (Day 1), Day 5, and 6 month follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Vertigo Analogue Scale (VVAS)
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 month follow up
Visual Vertigo Analogue Scale. There are 9 separate visual analogue scales to rate intensity of visual vertigo provoking situation. Each scale is on a 0-10 cm line. Full scale from 0-10. Higher score represents more dizziness.
Baseline and 6 month follow up
Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 month follow up
Physical, emotional, and functional disability related to MdDS will be assessed with DHI. DHI is a 25-item self report questionnaire, total score range from 0 to 100, with higher score indicating more perceived disability.
Baseline and 6 month follow up
VOR Direct Pathway Gain
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 5
The vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) is a class of reflex eye movement that counters head movement to stabilize vision. A perfect stabilization occurs when the velocity of the retinal image slip is zero, i.e. when the ratio, or gain, of the eye rotation speed to the head rotation speed is one. The VOR is a fast reflex whose direct pathway consists of a three-neuron arc, but also has parallel, indirect pathways that allow integration of signals from the peripheral vestibular organs with those of other sensory modalities such as vision and proprioception to modulate the eye movement response. The gain of the direct VOR pathway is the ratio of the eye rotation speed to the head rotation speed at the onset of head rotation, and is a unitless measure.
Baseline and Day 5
VOR Indirect Pathway Time Constant
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 5
The velocity storage mechanism is an indirect component of the VOR that facilitates the reflex by storing and releasing signals related to head rotation, for example by prolonging the eye movement response beyond the peripheral vestibular activity during head movement and generating similar eye movement response to rotational cues provided by other sensory modalities. The time constant of this indirect VOR pathway is the rate of charging/discharging in the exponential ideation of its behavior, measured in seconds, estimated from the profile of eye rotation speed during prolonged whole-body rotation that is the combination of the contributions from the direct and indirect pathways.
Baseline and Day 5
VOR Indirect Pathway Coupling Gain
Time Frame: Baseline and Day 5
The gain of the indirect VOR pathway is the term that determines the contribution of velocity storage to the profile of eye rotation speed during prolonged whole-body rotation. The measure is normalized to the head rotation velocity and is thus unitless.
Baseline and Day 5

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sergei Yakushin, PhD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 23, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 27, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 12, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • GCO-19-0348
  • 1R21DC018390-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal to achieve aims in the approved proposal.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Study Data/Documents

  1. Study Protocol

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings