Effects of Sulforaphane in Patients With Prodromal to Mild Alzheimer's Disease

May 9, 2020 updated by: Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

Randomized,Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Efficacy and Safety Study of Sulforaphane in Patients With Prodromal to Mild Alzheimer's Disease

In this proposed study, the investigators will evaluate the efficacy, safety and related mechanism of sulforaphane in treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The study will recruit 160 AD patients, and then these patients will be randomized to sulforaphane group or placebo group (80 patients per arm) for 24 weeks clinic trial. Clinical efficacy and safety assessment will be done at screen/baseline, 4 week, 12 week, and 24 week. The specific aims are to compare sulforaphane versus placebo on: clinical core symptoms; biological samples also will be collected, and stored to research related mechanisms. During the study period, safety index including blood and urine routine, liver and kidney function, coagulation index and clinical effect index about neuropsychological scales will be recorded.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In this proposed study, the investigators will evaluate the efficacy, safety and related mechanism of sulforaphane in treatment of AD. The study will recruit 160 AD patients, then these patients will be randomized to sulforaphane group or placebo group (80 patients per arm) for 24 weeks clinic trial. Clinical efficacy and safety assessment will be done at screen/baseline, 4 week, 12 week, 24 week. The specific aims are to compare sulforaphane versus placebo on: 1) clinical core symptoms; The investigators hypothesize that (1) sulforaphane is superior to placebo in the treatment of clinical symptoms in patients with AD, measured by the ADAS-cog, MMSE Scale, Moca; (2) Biological samples will be collected, and stored so that the hypothesis sulforaphane may alter oxidative stress indexes or inflammatory biomarkers, and influence histone deacetylase inhibitor mechanism or inflammatory mechanism et al that may be significantly correlated with clinical improvement. (3) Safety index including blood and urine routine, liver and kidney function, coagulation index and clinical effect index about neuropsychological scales will be recorded.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
160

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310009
        • Recruiting
        • Second Affiliated Hospital,Zhejiang University School of Medicine
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Age range from 50 to 75 (including 50 and 75 years old), regardless of ethnic group or gender;
  • 2. The subjects should be able to complete the cognitive ability measurement and other tests specified in the protocol;
  • 3. Meeting the criteria for likely Alzheimer's Disease （AD） dementia (2011) by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Strokes - Alzheimer's Disease and Related Diseases Association（NINCDS-ADRDA）;
  • 4. Patients with mild dementia: the total score of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) : ≥22 points; Clinical Dementia Rating scale （CDR）score > or equal to 0.5 and < or equal to1；The MMSE score provides evidence of mild disease severity and the CDR-GS score indicates that the patients have noticeable amnestic (pAD) or cognitive and functional (mAD) deficits
  • 5. The total score of the Hachinski Ischemic Score （HIS ）was < 4.
  • 6. Hamilton depression scale (17 items) total score ≤7 points;
  • 7. Brain MRI shows a high likelihood of AD;
  • 8. Before enrollment, patients should take a stable dose of dementia drugs (donepezil 5mg) ≥8 weeks;
  • 9. The expected survival time is > 1 year;
  • 10. Subjects should have a stable and reliable caregiver, or at least have frequent contact with the caregiver (at least 3 days per week and at least 2 hours per day), who will help patients participate in the whole study; Caregivers must accompany the subjects to the visit and assist in completing the relevant scale.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Refuse to sign the inform consent form;
  • 2. Other causes of dementia: known vascular, central nervous system infection ,Parkinson's disease, traumatic brain dementia, other physical and chemical factors; serious body disease , intracranial space-occupying lesions, endocrine system disease, such as thyroid disease, and a lack of vitamin B12, folic acid, or any other known causes of dementia.
  • 3. Central nervous system diseases (including stroke, optic neuromyelitis, Parkinson's disease, epilepsy, etc.);
  • 4. Obvious positive signs of nervous system examination;
  • 5. Psychotic patients, including schizophrenia or other disorders with bipolar disorder, major depression or delirium;
  • 6. Uncontrolled hypertension or hypotension during screening: systolic blood pressure ≥180（millimetres of mercury ）mmHg or < 90mmhg, or diastolic blood pressure ≥120mmHg or < 60mmhg;
  • 7. Unstable or severe diseases of the heart, lung, liver, kidney and hematopoietic system according to the judgment of the researchers;
  • 8. Patients with incurable visual and auditory disorders that cannot complete neuropsychological tests and scales;
  • 9. Female subjects who are positive in pregnancy test or breast-feeding and who cannot take effective contraceptive measures or have a birth plan;
  • 10. Severe allergy, non-allergic drug reaction or multi-drug allergy history;
  • 11. Participated in other clinical trials within 3 months before screening visit;
  • 12. Taking any health care products related to brain and brain improvement currently and failing to keep the promise to stop using the above products;
  • 13. Other conditions are unsuitable for participating in this study according to the judgement of researchers.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: sulforaphane group
The patients will take sulforaphane for 24 weeks, 2550mg once a day.
Dietary supplement: sulforaphane
Sulforaphane take 2550mg once a day.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo group
The patients will take placebo for 24 weeks, 2550mg once a day.
Dietary supplement: Placebo
Placebo take 2550mg once a day.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale
Time Frame: From baseline to 24 weeks
The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog) will be performed to test the cognition of patients at the enrollment, week 12 and week 24. The score ranges from 0 to 75，and higher values represent a better outcome.
From baseline to 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Alzheimer's Disease Collaborative research group-Activities of Daily Living scores.
Time Frame: From baseline to 24 weeks
Alzheimer's Disease Collaborative research group-Activities of Daily Living scores (ADCS-ADL) will be performed to test the activities of patients at the enrollment,week 6 and week12.The score ranges from 0 to 54，and higher values represent a better outcome.
From baseline to 24 weeks
Neuropsychiatric Inventory scores
Time Frame: baseline time to 24 weeks
Neuropsychiatric Inventory scores (NPI) will be performed to test the mental symptoms of patients at the enrollment and week12.The score ranges from 0 to 144，and higher values represent a worse outcome.
baseline time to 24 weeks
Mini-Mental State Examination scores
Time Frame: baseline time to 24 weeks
Mini-Mental State Examination scores(MMSE) will be performed to test the cognition of patients at the enrollment and week12.The score ranges from 0 to 30，and higher values represent a better outcome.
baseline time to 24 weeks
Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores
Time Frame: baseline time to 24 weeks
Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores (MoCA) will be performed to test the cognition of patients at the enrollment and week12.The score ranges from 0 to 30，and higher values represent a better outcome.
baseline time to 24 weeks
Clinician Interview-Based Impression of Change plus caregiver input
Time Frame: baseline time to 24 weeks
Clinician Interview-Based Impression of Change plus caregiver input (CIBIC-plus) is widely used in antidementia drug trials. It comprises Likert scales for disease severity and changes, and written accounts summarizing semistructured interviews evaluating behavior, cognition, and function.
baseline time to 24 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oxidative stress indexes
Time Frame: At baseline and 24 week/endpoint
The change of Oxidative stress indexes as tested by Oxidative stress indexes detection kit
At baseline and 24 week/endpoint
Epigenetics indicators
Time Frame: At baseline and 24 week/endpoint
The change of Epigenetics indicators as tested by Epigenetics indicators
At baseline and 24 week/endpoint
Cytokines & Chemokines
Time Frame: At baseline and 24 week/endpoint
The change of Cytokines & Chemokines as tested by Cytokines & Chemokines detection kit
At baseline and 24 week/endpoint
Metabolites
Time Frame: At baseline and 24 week/endpoint
The change of Metabolites as tested by Metabolites detection kit
At baseline and 24 week/endpoint
RNA expression
Time Frame: At baseline and 24 week/endpoint
The change of RNA expression as tested by RNA expression detection kit
At baseline and 24 week/endpoint
Intestinal microflora
Time Frame: At baseline and 24 week/endpoint
The change of intestinal microflora as tested by Metagenomic technique
At baseline and 24 week/endpoint

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 10, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 13, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 24, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 12, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 9, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Wulab-AD sulforaphane

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings