Extension Study for 43USSA1705

February 20, 2025 updated by: Galderma R&D

Open Label Extension Study for 43USSA1705 (A Randomized, Evaluator-blinded, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Sculptra Aesthetic for Correction of Nasolabial Folds)

To evaluate the long-term safety of Sculptra Aesthetic as a single regimen for correction of Nasolabial Fold (NLF) contour deficiencies after changes in reconstitution and injection procedures compared to the approved label.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
38

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85255
        • Galderma Study Site
    • Florida
      • Bradenton, Florida, United States, 34209
        • Galderma Study Site
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78746
        • Galderma Study Site
      • Spring, Texas, United States, 77388
        • Galderma Study Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Randomized to Sculptra Aesthetic 8ml reconstitution and successfully completed study 43USSA1705

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical condition that in the opinion of the Investigator would make the subject unsuitable for inclusion
  • Other condition preventing the subject from entering the study in the Investigator's opinion
  • Participation in any interventional clinical study throughout the duration of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Sculptra Aesthetic
Participants who completed 48 weeks of Sculptra Aesthetic reconstituted with 8 milliliters (mL) of sterile water for injection (SWFI) in study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244) were followed into this long-term extension study at Week 72 and Week 96 after baseline (i.e., Day 1/first treatment session with Sculptra Aesthetic in Study 43USSA1705 [NCT03780244]). No investigational product was provided during this extension study.
Device: Sculptra Aesthetic, Lidocaine HCL
No intervention was administered during this extension study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline on Both Sides of the Face as Assessed by the Evaluator Using the WAS at Weeks 72 and 96
Time Frame: Baseline of study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244), Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
The WAS is a validated photograph-based outcome instrument that is designed specifically for quantifying facial folds. Scoring of NLF wrinkle severity (grades 0-5, with 0 representing no wrinkles and 5 representing very deep wrinkles, redundant fold) was based on visual live assessment by the Blinded Evaluator at defined timepoints. Lower scores indicate better outcome. Effectiveness is defined as change from baseline on both sides of the face using WAS at 72 and 96 weeks after the first treatment session. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).
Baseline of study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244), Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants (Responders) Assessed Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Based on the Participants Live Assessment
Time Frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
A responder was defined as a participant assessed as at least "Improved" (very much improved, much improved, and improved) on both sides of the face concurrently assessed using GAIS by participant. The 7-graded GAIS used by the participant to live assess the aesthetic improvement had responses as follows: (3) Very Much Improved, (2) Much Improved, (1) Improved, (0) No Change, (-1) Worse, (-2) Much Worse, and (-3) Very Much Worse. For reporting of outcomes, the higher the GAIS value, the greater the improvement (Range -3 to 3). Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).
At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
Number of Participants (Responders) Assessed Using the GAIS Based on the Investigator Live Assessment
Time Frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
A responder was defined as a participant assessed as at least "Improved" (very much improved, much improved, and improved) on both sides of the face concurrently assessed using GAIS by investigator. The 7-graded GAIS used by the participant to live assess the aesthetic improvement had responses as follows: (3) Very Much Improved, (2) Much Improved, (1) Improved, (0) No Change, (-1) Worse, (-2) Much Worse, and (-3) Very Much Worse. For reporting of outcomes, the higher the GAIS value, the greater the improvement (Range -3 to 3). Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705. (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).
At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
FACE-Q™ Appraisal of Lines Rasch Transformed Total Scores: NLF Questionnaire
Time Frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
FACE-Q™ appraisal of lines NLF scores were used to assess participant's treatment satisfaction. The sum of the participants FACE-Q™ appraisal of lines NLF scores was converted to a Rasch-transformed total score (ranged from 0 to 100) according to the FACE-Q™ manual; a higher total score indicated greater participant satisfaction. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705. (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).
At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Would You Recommend the Treatment to a Friend?
Time Frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
A subject satisfaction question with responses Yes or No. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).
At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Would You do the Treatment Again?
Time Frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
A subject satisfaction question with responses Yes or No. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).
At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Would You Say the Subtle Treatment Results Over Time Was Worth it?
Time Frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
A 5-point subject satisfaction questionnaire with the following responses: Strongly Agree, Agree, Neither Agree nor Disagree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705. (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).
At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Would You Say the Treatment Results Are Natural Looking?
Time Frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
A 5-point participant satisfaction questionnaire with the following responses: Strongly Agree, Agree, Neither Agree Nor Disagree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).
At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Improve Your Facial Symmetry/Balance?
Time Frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
A 5-point subject satisfaction questionnaire with the following responses: Very Satisfied, Satisfied, Neutral, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).
At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Make You Look the Way You Feel?
Time Frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
A 5-point subject satisfaction questionnaire with the following responses: Very Satisfied, Satisfied, Neutral, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).
At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Make You Look/Feel More Confident in Your Life?
Time Frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
A 5-point subject satisfaction questionnaire with the following responses: Very Satisfied, Satisfied, Neutral, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).
At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Improve Your Self-confidence?
Time Frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
A 5-point subject satisfaction questionnaire with the following responses: Very Satisfied, Satisfied, Neutral, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).
At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Improve Overall Satisfaction With Your Appearance?
Time Frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
A 5-point subject satisfaction questionnaire with the following responses: Very Satisfied, Satisfied, Neutral, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).
At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Make You Feel Better About Yourself?
Time Frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
A 5-point subject satisfaction questionnaire with the following responses: Very Satisfied, Satisfied, Neutral, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).
At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Improve Your Attractiveness?
Time Frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
A 5-point subject satisfaction questionnaire with the following responses: Very Satisfied, Satisfied, Neutral, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).
At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment: Does the Treatment Make You Look Younger?
Time Frame: At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
A 5-point subject satisfaction questionnaire with the following responses: Very Satisfied, Satisfied, Neutral, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244). Therefore, Weeks 72 and 96 in timeframe represents timepoints of current extension study and calculated from baseline of 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).
At Weeks 72 and 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
Number of Participants With At Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
Time Frame: From Baseline of study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244) up to Week 96 (assessed in the current extension study)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, or untoward clinical signs of a clinical investigation in participants, whether or not related to the investigational device which included events related to the investigational product (IP) or the reference product, events related to the procedures involved and events that were anticipated as well as unanticipated. SAE: an AE resulting in death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. TEAE: any AEs occurring or worsening at or after first dose of IP or ongoing at time of enrollment. Baseline was defined as the observation that was closest to but prior to study treatment at the baseline visit/first treatment in Study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244).
From Baseline of study 43USSA1705 (NCT03780244) up to Week 96 (assessed in the current extension study)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Galderma R&D

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 3, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 29, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 29, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 8, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 20, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 43USSA1705ext

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings