Proximal Versus Distal Segments of No-Touch Saphenous Vein Grafts

March 13, 2020 updated by: China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases

Major Leg Wound Complications Between the Proximal and Distal Segments of Saphenous Veins Harvested by No-Touch Technique in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: a Single-center Randomized Within-subject Controlled Clinical Trial

The optimum segment of No-Touch veins for bypassing is still undefined. The purpose of this study is to assess the incidence of leg wound complication after No-Touch harvesting of proximal segment of saphenous veins compared to distal segment of veins in the leg. Graft occlusion rates between the two segments of veins for bypassing will also be compared during follow-up.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, single-center, open-label, randomized within-subject-controlled trial. We aim to randomize 100 patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). We consecutively screen patients during the study enrollment period and seek informed consent from all eligible patients. In each patient, one saphenous vein graft (SVG) will be randomized to be the proximal segment, while another will be the distal segment as control. Healing of leg wounds will be assessed on day 6 post-operatively. Follow-up will be performed via face-to-face interview until at least 1 year after the operation by CT angiography.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100037
        • Recruiting
        • Fuwai Hospital Chinese Academay of Medical Science and National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Shengshou Hu, M.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Xianqiang Wang, M.D.
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Meice Tian, M.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 18 or older who undergo primary isolated open-chest CABG with two vein grafts, one to the left coronary territory and the other to the right, with or without cardiopulmonary bypass

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concomitant cardiac or vascular surgeries (i.e. valve repair or replacement, Maze surgery)
  • Redo CABG
  • Emergent CABG (cardiogenic shock, inotropic pressure support, IABP)
  • Severe vein varicosity as assessed after vein harvesting and before randomization
  • Use of vascular stapler for anastomosis
  • Endarterectomy of coronary artery during surgery
  • Left ventricular repair due to ventricular aneurysm
  • Concomitant life-threatening disease likely to limit life expectancy to less than two years
  • Severe renal insufficiency (i.e. creatinine >200 μmol/L)
  • Contraindications for dual antiplatelet therapy, such as active gastroduodenal ulcer
  • Participant of other ongoing clinical trials

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Proximal group
Proximal segment of saphenous veins are harvested from the thigh by No-Touch technique and randomized to bypass the left or right territory of coronary system
Procedure: Proximal and distal segment of saphenous vein harvested by No-Touch technique
two longitudinal incisions are made on the thigh and shank from unilateral lower limb (for harvesting of proximal segment of saphenous vein, incision is started from about 3 or 4cms inferolateral to the pubic tubercle and then extended downward). As previous reported. the adventitia and perivascular tissue are carefully kept intact to avoid damage. Then a margin of about 5 mm from both sides of the vein is created to include the fat pedicle using electrocautery, and all visible side branches are ligated with 4-0 silk or by metal clipping (branches are divided at the pedicle margin rather than the vein trunk). The saphenous vein is then separated from its bed using scissors and electrocautery, together with surrounding tissue.
Active Comparator: Distal group
Distal segment of saphenous veins are harvested from the shank of the ipsilateral leg by No-Touch technique and used to bypass the right or left territory of coronary system (depending on the randomizing result of the proximal segments)
Procedure: Proximal and distal segment of saphenous vein harvested by No-Touch technique
two longitudinal incisions are made on the thigh and shank from unilateral lower limb (for harvesting of proximal segment of saphenous vein, incision is started from about 3 or 4cms inferolateral to the pubic tubercle and then extended downward). As previous reported. the adventitia and perivascular tissue are carefully kept intact to avoid damage. Then a margin of about 5 mm from both sides of the vein is created to include the fat pedicle using electrocautery, and all visible side branches are ligated with 4-0 silk or by metal clipping (branches are divided at the pedicle margin rather than the vein trunk). The saphenous vein is then separated from its bed using scissors and electrocautery, together with surrounding tissue.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major leg wound complication at 6 days postoperatively
Time Frame: 6 days postoperatively
a leg wound that had failed to respond to conservative treatment and required subsequent surgical intervention such as debridement, re-suture, delayed wound closure
6 days postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major leg wound complication during 3-month follow-up
Time Frame: 3 month
a leg wound that had failed to respond to conservative treatment and required subsequent surgical intervention such as debridement, re-suture, delayed wound closure
3 month
Graft vessel occlusion at 3 month and 1 year
Time Frame: 3 months and 1 year
Graft occlusion is detected by multislice computed tomography angiography (MSCTA). Graft assessment is conducted according to the FitzGibbon criteria. Each graft is graded as A (excellent), B (fair), or O (occluded). Contrast filling of the grafts, anastomoses, and coronary arteries beyond the graft are considered in each assessment. Grade A indicates that the graft is patent with ≤50% stenosis. Grade B indicates that graft stenosis is >50% but not occluded. When a conduit does not fill with contrast at all, it is considered Grade O and included with string sign found in any segment (including proximal anastomotic site, distal anastomotic site, and main trunk). Both of these latter findings are considered together and referred to as occlusion in the analysis.
3 months and 1 year

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE)
Time Frame: 3 months and 1 year
including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and target vessel revascularization
3 months and 1 year
Individual MACCE
Time Frame: 3 months and 1 year
including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke and target vessel revascularization
3 months and 1 year
Recurrence of angina
Time Frame: 3 months and 1 year

Events that fulfill the following definition are to be coded as Angina:

i. ischemic chest pain or equivalent (e.g. arm, neck or jaw pain or discomfort thought to be related to cardiac ischemia); and ii. no evidence of MI; and iii. no clear alternative (non-cardiac) explanation (e.g. anemia, arrhythmia)
3 months and 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 22, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 25, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 26, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 13, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2019-F06

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings