- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04284956
Proximal Versus Distal Segments of No-Touch Saphenous Vein Grafts
March 13, 2020 updated by: China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
Major Leg Wound Complications Between the Proximal and Distal Segments of Saphenous Veins Harvested by No-Touch Technique in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: a Single-center Randomized Within-subject Controlled Clinical Trial
The optimum segment of No-Touch veins for bypassing is still undefined.
The purpose of this study is to assess the incidence of leg wound complication after No-Touch harvesting of proximal segment of saphenous veins compared to distal segment of veins in the leg.
Graft occlusion rates between the two segments of veins for bypassing will also be compared during follow-up.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a prospective, single-center, open-label, randomized within-subject-controlled trial.
We aim to randomize 100 patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).
We consecutively screen patients during the study enrollment period and seek informed consent from all eligible patients.
In each patient, one saphenous vein graft (SVG) will be randomized to be the proximal segment, while another will be the distal segment as control.
Healing of leg wounds will be assessed on day 6 post-operatively.
Follow-up will be performed via face-to-face interview until at least 1 year after the operation by CT angiography.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
100
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Beijing
-
Beijing, Beijing, China, 100037
- Recruiting
- Fuwai Hospital Chinese Academay of Medical Science and National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
-
Contact:
- Meice Tian, M.D.
- Phone Number: +8613718863077
- Email: tianmeice@fuwaihospital.org
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Shengshou Hu, M.D.
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Xianqiang Wang, M.D.
-
Principal Investigator:
- Meice Tian, M.D.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged 18 or older who undergo primary isolated open-chest CABG with two vein grafts, one to the left coronary territory and the other to the right, with or without cardiopulmonary bypass
Exclusion Criteria:
- Concomitant cardiac or vascular surgeries (i.e. valve repair or replacement, Maze surgery)
- Redo CABG
- Emergent CABG (cardiogenic shock, inotropic pressure support, IABP)
- Severe vein varicosity as assessed after vein harvesting and before randomization
- Use of vascular stapler for anastomosis
- Endarterectomy of coronary artery during surgery
- Left ventricular repair due to ventricular aneurysm
- Concomitant life-threatening disease likely to limit life expectancy to less than two years
- Severe renal insufficiency (i.e. creatinine >200 μmol/L)
- Contraindications for dual antiplatelet therapy, such as active gastroduodenal ulcer
- Participant of other ongoing clinical trials
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Proximal group
Proximal segment of saphenous veins are harvested from the thigh by No-Touch technique and randomized to bypass the left or right territory of coronary system
|
two longitudinal incisions are made on the thigh and shank from unilateral lower limb (for harvesting of proximal segment of saphenous vein, incision is started from about 3 or 4cms inferolateral to the pubic tubercle and then extended downward).
As previous reported.
the adventitia and perivascular tissue are carefully kept intact to avoid damage.
Then a margin of about 5 mm from both sides of the vein is created to include the fat pedicle using electrocautery, and all visible side branches are ligated with 4-0 silk or by metal clipping (branches are divided at the pedicle margin rather than the vein trunk).
The saphenous vein is then separated from its bed using scissors and electrocautery, together with surrounding tissue.
|
Active Comparator: Distal group
Distal segment of saphenous veins are harvested from the shank of the ipsilateral leg by No-Touch technique and used to bypass the right or left territory of coronary system (depending on the randomizing result of the proximal segments)
|
two longitudinal incisions are made on the thigh and shank from unilateral lower limb (for harvesting of proximal segment of saphenous vein, incision is started from about 3 or 4cms inferolateral to the pubic tubercle and then extended downward).
As previous reported.
the adventitia and perivascular tissue are carefully kept intact to avoid damage.
Then a margin of about 5 mm from both sides of the vein is created to include the fat pedicle using electrocautery, and all visible side branches are ligated with 4-0 silk or by metal clipping (branches are divided at the pedicle margin rather than the vein trunk).
The saphenous vein is then separated from its bed using scissors and electrocautery, together with surrounding tissue.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Major leg wound complication at 6 days postoperatively
Time Frame: 6 days postoperatively
|
a leg wound that had failed to respond to conservative treatment and required subsequent surgical intervention such as debridement, re-suture, delayed wound closure
|
6 days postoperatively
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Major leg wound complication during 3-month follow-up
Time Frame: 3 month
|
a leg wound that had failed to respond to conservative treatment and required subsequent surgical intervention such as debridement, re-suture, delayed wound closure
|
3 month
|
Graft vessel occlusion at 3 month and 1 year
Time Frame: 3 months and 1 year
|
Graft occlusion is detected by multislice computed tomography angiography (MSCTA).
Graft assessment is conducted according to the FitzGibbon criteria.
Each graft is graded as A (excellent), B (fair), or O (occluded).
Contrast filling of the grafts, anastomoses, and coronary arteries beyond the graft are considered in each assessment.
Grade A indicates that the graft is patent with ≤50% stenosis.
Grade B indicates that graft stenosis is >50% but not occluded.
When a conduit does not fill with contrast at all, it is considered Grade O and included with string sign found in any segment (including proximal anastomotic site, distal anastomotic site, and main trunk).
Both of these latter findings are considered together and referred to as occlusion in the analysis.
|
3 months and 1 year
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE)
Time Frame: 3 months and 1 year
|
including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and target vessel revascularization
|
3 months and 1 year
|
Individual MACCE
Time Frame: 3 months and 1 year
|
including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke and target vessel revascularization
|
3 months and 1 year
|
Recurrence of angina
Time Frame: 3 months and 1 year
|
Events that fulfill the following definition are to be coded as Angina: i. ischemic chest pain or equivalent (e.g. arm, neck or jaw pain or discomfort thought to be related to cardiac ischemia); and ii. no evidence of MI; and iii. no clear alternative (non-cardiac) explanation (e.g. anemia, arrhythmia) |
3 months and 1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 1, 2020
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
June 30, 2020
Study Completion (Anticipated)
June 30, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 22, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 25, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
February 26, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 17, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 13, 2020
Last Verified
March 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2019-F06
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.