Proximal Versus Distal Segments of No-Touch Saphenous Vein Grafts

Major Leg Wound Complications Between the Proximal and Distal Segments of Saphenous Veins Harvested by No-Touch Technique in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: a Single-center Randomized Within-subject Controlled Clinical Trial

The optimum segment of No-Touch veins for bypassing is still undefined. The purpose of this study is to assess the incidence of leg wound complication after No-Touch harvesting of proximal segment of saphenous veins compared to distal segment of veins in the leg. Graft occlusion rates between the two segments of veins for bypassing will also be compared during follow-up.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, single-center, open-label, randomized within-subject-controlled trial. We aim to randomize 100 patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). We consecutively screen patients during the study enrollment period and seek informed consent from all eligible patients. In each patient, one saphenous vein graft (SVG) will be randomized to be the proximal segment, while another will be the distal segment as control. Healing of leg wounds will be assessed on day 6 post-operatively. Follow-up will be performed via face-to-face interview until at least 1 year after the operation by CT angiography.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100037
        • Recruiting
        • Fuwai Hospital Chinese Academay of Medical Science and National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Shengshou Hu, M.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Xianqiang Wang, M.D.
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Meice Tian, M.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 18 or older who undergo primary isolated open-chest CABG with two vein grafts, one to the left coronary territory and the other to the right, with or without cardiopulmonary bypass

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concomitant cardiac or vascular surgeries (i.e. valve repair or replacement, Maze surgery)
  • Redo CABG
  • Emergent CABG (cardiogenic shock, inotropic pressure support, IABP)
  • Severe vein varicosity as assessed after vein harvesting and before randomization
  • Use of vascular stapler for anastomosis
  • Endarterectomy of coronary artery during surgery
  • Left ventricular repair due to ventricular aneurysm
  • Concomitant life-threatening disease likely to limit life expectancy to less than two years
  • Severe renal insufficiency (i.e. creatinine >200 μmol/L)
  • Contraindications for dual antiplatelet therapy, such as active gastroduodenal ulcer
  • Participant of other ongoing clinical trials

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Proximal group
Proximal segment of saphenous veins are harvested from the thigh by No-Touch technique and randomized to bypass the left or right territory of coronary system
two longitudinal incisions are made on the thigh and shank from unilateral lower limb (for harvesting of proximal segment of saphenous vein, incision is started from about 3 or 4cms inferolateral to the pubic tubercle and then extended downward). As previous reported. the adventitia and perivascular tissue are carefully kept intact to avoid damage. Then a margin of about 5 mm from both sides of the vein is created to include the fat pedicle using electrocautery, and all visible side branches are ligated with 4-0 silk or by metal clipping (branches are divided at the pedicle margin rather than the vein trunk). The saphenous vein is then separated from its bed using scissors and electrocautery, together with surrounding tissue.
Active Comparator: Distal group
Distal segment of saphenous veins are harvested from the shank of the ipsilateral leg by No-Touch technique and used to bypass the right or left territory of coronary system (depending on the randomizing result of the proximal segments)
two longitudinal incisions are made on the thigh and shank from unilateral lower limb (for harvesting of proximal segment of saphenous vein, incision is started from about 3 or 4cms inferolateral to the pubic tubercle and then extended downward). As previous reported. the adventitia and perivascular tissue are carefully kept intact to avoid damage. Then a margin of about 5 mm from both sides of the vein is created to include the fat pedicle using electrocautery, and all visible side branches are ligated with 4-0 silk or by metal clipping (branches are divided at the pedicle margin rather than the vein trunk). The saphenous vein is then separated from its bed using scissors and electrocautery, together with surrounding tissue.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major leg wound complication at 6 days postoperatively
Time Frame: 6 days postoperatively
a leg wound that had failed to respond to conservative treatment and required subsequent surgical intervention such as debridement, re-suture, delayed wound closure
6 days postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major leg wound complication during 3-month follow-up
Time Frame: 3 month
a leg wound that had failed to respond to conservative treatment and required subsequent surgical intervention such as debridement, re-suture, delayed wound closure
3 month
Graft vessel occlusion at 3 month and 1 year
Time Frame: 3 months and 1 year
Graft occlusion is detected by multislice computed tomography angiography (MSCTA). Graft assessment is conducted according to the FitzGibbon criteria. Each graft is graded as A (excellent), B (fair), or O (occluded). Contrast filling of the grafts, anastomoses, and coronary arteries beyond the graft are considered in each assessment. Grade A indicates that the graft is patent with ≤50% stenosis. Grade B indicates that graft stenosis is >50% but not occluded. When a conduit does not fill with contrast at all, it is considered Grade O and included with string sign found in any segment (including proximal anastomotic site, distal anastomotic site, and main trunk). Both of these latter findings are considered together and referred to as occlusion in the analysis.
3 months and 1 year

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE)
Time Frame: 3 months and 1 year
including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and target vessel revascularization
3 months and 1 year
Individual MACCE
Time Frame: 3 months and 1 year
including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke and target vessel revascularization
3 months and 1 year
Recurrence of angina
Time Frame: 3 months and 1 year

Events that fulfill the following definition are to be coded as Angina:

i. ischemic chest pain or equivalent (e.g. arm, neck or jaw pain or discomfort thought to be related to cardiac ischemia); and ii. no evidence of MI; and iii. no clear alternative (non-cardiac) explanation (e.g. anemia, arrhythmia)

3 months and 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 26, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019-F06

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

3
Subscribe