Percutaneous Lung Biopsy Using Cone Beam CT With Virtual Guidance: a Randomized Control Trial

October 19, 2022 updated by: Simon Yu, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Image-guided percutaneous lung biopsy is an essential procedure in lung cancer management, where it is integral to confirming the diagnosis and determining tumour histology. An ideal percutaneous lung biopsy also needs to have a short procedure time with accurate needle placement to minimize the inherent risk of the procedure.

Since the 1970s, conventional Multi-detector CT (MDCT) has been the modality of choice in percutaneous lung biopsy. Recent research has proposed CT fluoroscopy and cone-beam CT (CBCT) as alternative methods.

Virtual guidance has been developed to improve target visibility and access for these complex cases. More specifically, it plans a potential computed 3D needle path before the procedure, using the CBCT images. This 3D path can be transposed onto real time fluoroscopic images to guide the biopsy, thus potentially improves patients' safety due to more accurate needle placement.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Image-guided percutaneous lung biopsy is an essential procedure in lung cancer management, where it is integral to confirming the diagnosis and determining tumour histology. In this era of personalized medicine where knowledge of specific cellular pathways and molecular characterization relies on obtaining optimal tissue sampling, the critical question is how to obtain a high-quality biopsy tissue sample that could be processed for various pathological assessment from a single, minimally invasive percutaneous image-guided approach.

An ideal percutaneous lung biopsy also needs to have a short procedure time with accurate needle placement to minimize the inherent risk of the procedure, including the stochastic effect of radiation, and injuries to structures resulting in pneumothorax, pulmonary hemorrhage, and air embolism, which could all be potentially life threatening. Previous studies have also shown that post-biopsy haemorrhage or pneumothorax requiring chest tubes insertion had worse outcome, increased length of hospital stays, and respiratory failure.

Since the 1970s, conventional Multi-detector CT (MDCT) has been the modality of choice in percutaneous lung biopsy, which requires repeated scanning of the target lesion during the procedure and the interventional radiologist entering and leaving the CT suite after each needle adjustment. Recent research has proposed CT fluoroscopy and cone-beam CT (CBCT) as alternative methods.

Virtual guidance has been developed to improve target visibility and access for these complex cases. This involves image registration where the real-time imaging dataset is matched to a reference dataset, where the position of a device is displayed on the current imaging dataset in real time. Syngo iGuideTM is a novel navigational software which has the potential for accurate needle guidance in percutaneous biopsy. More specifically, it plans a potential computed 3D needle path before the procedure, using the CBCT images. An integrated laser crosshair is also projected onto the patient's skin to indicate the entry point and angle of the needle at no additional radiation dose to the patient and staff. This 3D path can be transposed onto real time fluoroscopic images to guide the biopsy, thus potentially improves patients' safety due to more accurate needle placement.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
21

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Hong Kong
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Solitary or multiple lung lesions (solid or subsolid nodule, pulmonary infiltrate) ≥1cm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient <18 years old
  • Patient not able to give informed consent
  • Uncooperative patient who is unable to hold still or hold their breath for safe biopsy
  • Lesions <1cm
  • Lesions within 1cm of vital thoracic structures such as the great vessels and the mediastinum
  • Peripheral lesions accessible to biopsy with ultrasound guidance

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: conventional Multi-detector CT (MDCT)
Percutaneous lung biopsy using MDCT
Procedure: Percutaneous lung biopsy using conventional MDCT
Conventional CT biopsy will be performed using a 64 slice CT scanner. A preliminary plain CT is acquired covering the entire target lesion with a skin marker, and the interventional radiologist would decide on the skin puncture site and the needle pathway. A post-procedural CT scan will be made to detect pneumothorax or pulmonary haemorrhage. All images will be archived in the picture achieving and communication system (PACS).
Active Comparator: cone-beam CT (CBCT)
Percutaneous lung biopsy using CBCT
Procedure: Percutaneous lung biopsy CBCT
CBCT guided biopsy will be performed in the angiography suite. A preliminary CBCT (DynaCT) is acquired covering the entire target lesion is first performed. Image data will be displayed and processed using Syngo iGuide system. A potential needle trajectory will be drawn from skin to lesion. Integration of the cross-sectional images and real time fluoroscopy will result in three system positions: one bull's eye view and two progression views. During fluoroscopy, the planned needle trajectory and target will be overlaid on the real time fluoroscopy image. After the needle reaches the target, another CBCT will be performed to confirm needle position. Biopsy using coaxial system and post-procedural CT scans will be performed in similar fashion as the conventional CT group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The number of needle repositioning to reach the target
Time Frame: immediately after completion of procedure
This will be recorded during procedure
immediately after completion of procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
procedure time
Time Frame: immediately after completion of procedure
This will be recorded throughout procedure
immediately after completion of procedure
radiation dose
Time Frame: immediately after completion of procedure
This will be recorded throughout procedure
immediately after completion of procedure
complication
Time Frame: 1 month after completion of procedure
observation during and after procedure
1 month after completion of procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Chinese University of Hong Kong

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Simon Yu, Professor, DIIR, CUHK, Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 4, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 22, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 22, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 4, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 6, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 21, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 19, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • VIR-19-11

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Percutaneous lung biopsy using conventional MDCT

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings