Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy (MSCs) and Conditioned Medium Therapy for Osteoartrithis (OA)

February 23, 2026 updated by: PT. Prodia Stem Cell Indonesia

Innovative Osteoarthritis Therapy Using Combination of Mesenchymal Stem Cell (MSC) and Conditioned Medium (CM): A Comparative Study on Arthroscopy and Non-Arthroscopy

This study aims to compare the efficacy of Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell and secretome between arthroscopy and without arthroscopy intervention in OA patients. This study has 4 arms namely Arthroscopy + Booster, Arthroscopy + Pre-conditioning, Non-Arthroscopy + Booster, Non-Arthroscopy + Pre-conditioning.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The study subjects each group amounted to 5 patients suffering from osteoarthritis. Patients are evaluated before, and 1,3,6 months after injection.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
31

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Indonesia
    • DKI Jakarta
      • Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia, 10410
        • Gatot Soebroto Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

51 years to 66 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 55-70 years
  • Suffering from grade 2-3 OA was identified by two observers who differed accordingly Kellgren-Lawrence research scale
  • Absence of local or general infections
  • Haematological and biochemical analysis without significant changes being made cause contraindications
  • Patients can understand the nature of the study
  • Written informed consent is given to patients

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients are not willing to obey the study protocol
  • There are signs of infection or positive serology for HIV, hepatitis and syphilis
  • There is a history of cancer both in the family and yourself and the value of the examination tumour marker exceeds normal limits
  • There is a congenital disease that causes significant deformity of the knee can interfere with cell applications and interpret results
  • Articular injection of the knee by any drug during the previous 3 months
  • Participate in any clinical trial or treatment 30 days before the study
  • Other conditions may, according to medical criteria, not support participation in this research
  • Patients are subordinates or low ranking members

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Arthroscopy + Booster
After arthroscopy intervention, patient will be given 10 million UC-MSCs and 2 cc Secretome twice with 2 weeks interval via intra-articular injection.
Biological: Arthroscopy with Mesenchymal Stem Cells + Secretome + Secretome
After Arthroscopy intervention, patient recieve 10 million Allogeneic Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells in 2 cc NaCl, two weeks afterward, patient receive 2 cc Secretome, and four weeks later, patient receive another 2 cc Secretome. All intervention will be done via Intra-articular.
Experimental: Arthroscopy + Pre-Conditioning
After arthroscopy intervention, patient will be given 2 cc Secretome, 10 million UC-MSCs, and 2 cc Secretome with 2 weeks interval via intra-articular injection.
Biological: Arthroscopy with Secretome + Mesenchymal Stem Cells + Secretome
After Arthroscopy intervention, patient recieve 2 cc Secretome, two weeks afterward patient receive 10 million Allogeneic Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells in 2 cc NaCl, and four weeks later, patient receive another 2 cc Secretome. All intervention will be done via Intra-articular.
Experimental: Non Arthroscopy + Booster
Without arthroscopy intervention, patient will be given 10 million UC-MSCs and 2 cc Secretome twice with 2 weeks interval via intra-articular injection.
Biological: Non Arthroscopy with Mesenchymal Stem Cells + Secretome + Secretome
Without Arthroscopy intervention, patient recieve 10 million Allogeneic Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells in 2 cc NaCl, two weeks afterward, patient receive 2 cc Secretome, and four weeks later, patient receive another 2 cc Secretome. All intervention will be done via Intra-articular.
Other Names:
  • Secretome
Experimental: Non Arthroscopy + Pre-Conditioning
Without arthroscopy intervention, patient will be given 2 cc Secretome, 10 million UC-MSCs, and 2 cc Secretome with 2 weeks interval via intra-articular injection.
Biological: Non Arthroscopy with Secretome + Mesenchymal Stem Cells + Secretome
Without Arthroscopy intervention, patient recieve 2 cc Secretome, two weeks afterward patient receive 10 million Allogeneic Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells in 2 cc NaCl, and four weeks later, patient receive another 2 cc Secretome. All intervention will be done via Intra-articular.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 1 month after injection
To asses pain score, score 1(good)-10(worst)
1 month after injection
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 3 month after injection
To asses pain score, score 1(good)-10(worst)
3 month after injection
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 6 month after injection
To asses pain score, score 1(good)-10(worst)
6 month after injection
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
Time Frame: 1 month after injection
To evaluate the condition of patients with osteoarthritis, including pain, stiffness, and physical functioning of the joints.
1 month after injection
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
Time Frame: 3 month after injection
To evaluate the condition of patients with osteoarthritis, including pain, stiffness, and physical functioning of the joints.
3 month after injection
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
Time Frame: 6 month after injection
To evaluate the condition of patients with osteoarthritis, including pain, stiffness, and physical functioning of the joints.
6 month after injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Laboratory Asessment
Time Frame: 2 weeks after injection
COMP, MMP-13, IL-6
2 weeks after injection
Laboratory Asessment
Time Frame: 1 month after injection
COMP, MMP-13, IL-6
1 month after injection
Laboratory Asessment
Time Frame: 3 months after injection
COMP, MMP-13, IL-6
3 months after injection
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) T2 mapping
Time Frame: 6 month after injection
MRI T2 mapping is used for cartilage evaluation
6 month after injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
PT. Prodia Stem Cell Indonesia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 3, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 8, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 8, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 25, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 23, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CT/OA/02/2022

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings