Study of the Effectiveness of Supervised vs. Non-Supervised Therapeutic Exercise in Cancer Patients

May 12, 2020 updated by: Universidad Complutense de Madrid
AIM:To evaluate the effectiveness of a therapeutic exercise program (PET) in cancer patients in improving the quality of life and the need for supervision by health professionals during the performance of same after 6 weeks of intervention. DESIGN: Randomized and controlled clinical trial, parallel groups with active control group. With masking of randomization, patient evaluation and analysis of the data. SUBJETS OF STUDY: 58 patients diagnosed with breast and colon cancer and treated up to 2 years later, both with surgery, chemotherapy and hormonal treatments (inhibitors of aromatase, tamoxifen). INTERVENTION: both groups the treatment will be a common work-based therapeutic exercise program aerobic, strength-resistance and self-stretching, in addition to a reinforcement in recommendations usual self-care. The study includes two phases, phase of supervised work and phase of tracing. One of the groups will be supervised in the realization of PET for a period of 6weeks and the other group will do it autonomously and without supervision. The patients will be followed for 1 year, with five blind evaluations: at the beginning of the study, after 6 weeks of intervention, 3, 6 and 12 months after the start of the study.MEASUREMENTS: Principal: Quality of life assessed with the questionnaire measured with the European questionnaire Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30 (EORTC QLQ-30). Pre-post intervention measure, 3, 6 and 12 months. Secondary: Cancer-related fatigue evaluated with the Functional Assessment of scale Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F). Pre-post Measurement intervention, 3, 6 and 12 months. Functional capacity measured with the Test 6 minutes walking test. Pre-post Measurement intervention, 3, 6 and 12 months. Valuation of the measured force with manual hydraulic dynamometer and 5- test repetition sit-to-stand. Pre-post intervention measure, 3, 6 and 12 months.COST: effectiveness and cost / incremental utility associated to the program wil be estimated.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
58

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Spain
      • Madrid, Spain, 28031
        • Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18-70 years.
  • Oncological stage I, II or III.
  • Completed adjuvant treatment between 3 months to 2 years. ECOG 1-2.
  • Sign informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to read, understand and complete questionnaires, read and understand a brochure explanatory, understand and follow verbal orders (example; illiteracy, dementia or blindness).
  • Musculoskeletal disorders that prevent the exercise of the exercise bike, elliptical, march tape.
  • Important neurological disorders that involve impaired balance, coordination, ataxia.
  • Sporting activity at moderate intensity exceeding 150mnts / week.
  • Symptomatic anemia.
  • Fecal incontinence
  • Patient with a digestive ostomy.
  • Decompensated heart disease,
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Heart failure.
  • Musculoskeletal pathology (except for upper limb pathology in cancer patients of mom)
  • Cardio-respiratory pathology that limits physical activity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Supervised exercise group
Supervised intervention group: 3 weekly sessions of 1 hour during 6 weeks of therapeutic exercise in which aerobic physical activity will be combined with exercise strength of different muscle groups plus stretches on a supervised basis and strengthening of self-care.
Behavioral: Education program on healthy habits
6-week supervised educational program with 12-month follow-up compared to the same unsupervised intervention
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Not supervised exercise group
Unsupervised intervention group: The same therapeutic exercise protocol will be scheduled which will be carried out autonomously without supervision with telephone tracking.
Behavioral: Education program on healthy habits
6-week supervised educational program with 12-month follow-up compared to the same unsupervised intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Health Related Quality of Life: EORTC QLQ-30
Time Frame: Basal, 1.5, 3, 6, 12 months follow up

Quality of life assessed with the questionnaire measured with the European questionnaire Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30.

(EORTC QLQ-30). The QLQ-C30 questionnaire is a specific questionnaire for cancer, it is composed of 30 questions or items that assess the quality of life in relation to physical, emotional, social aspects and in general the level of functionality of patients diagnosed with cancer. The QLQ-C30 questionnaire is assigned values between 1 and 4 (1: not at all, 2: a little, 3: a lot, 4: a lot) according to the patient's responses to the item, only in items 29 and 30 are assessed with score from 1 to 7 (1: bad, 7: excellent). The scores obtained are standardized and a score between 0 and 100 is obtained, 0 being the worst possible and 100 the best.
Basal, 1.5, 3, 6, 12 months follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fatigue
Time Frame: Basal, 1.5, 3, 6, 12 months follow up

Fatigue measurement with FACIT-F (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue) questionaire.

The FACIT-F 13-item scale is designed on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = nothing; 1 = little; 2 = something; 3 = a lot; 4 = very much). The FACIT-F scale is designed so that a high score is good, the possible score is 0 to 52, 0 being the worst possible and 52 the best.
Basal, 1.5, 3, 6, 12 months follow up
Funtional capacity
Time Frame: Basal, 1.5, 3, 6, 12 months follow up
The 6-minute walk test consists of measuring the maximum distance that the patient is able to walk in 6 minutes, on a tour short in a hallway, simultaneously assessing heart rate, oxygen saturation and degree of dyspnea. Usually healthy people can walk between 400 and 700 meters in 6 minutes, depending on age, height and sex
Basal, 1.5, 3, 6, 12 months follow up
Valuation of the measured force
Time Frame: Basal, 1.5, 3, 6, 12 months follow up
Valuation of the measured force with manual hydraulic dynamometer and 5- test repetition sit-to-stand. The test assesses the act of sitting and standing for five repetitions as quickly as possible, in a chair without arms with a seat height of 43 cm. The participant crosses his arms over his chest and sits with his back against the vertical back of the chair. The performance of the test is based on its duration; Consequently, the shorter the time it takes for the patient to perform the test, the better it will be.
Basal, 1.5, 3, 6, 12 months follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 13, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 12, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20/007-E_TFM

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings