International Validation of Two Non-motor Scales in PD (NFS and SPARK)

April 9, 2025 updated by: Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

International Validation of Two Non-motor Scales in Parkinson's Disease: the Neuropsychiatric Fluctuations Scale (NFS) and the Shame in Parkinson's Disease (SPARK) Scale

The goal of this project is to develop the international validation of two new rating scales, the Neuropsychiatric Fluctuations Scale (NFS) and the Shame in PARKinson's disease (SPARK) Scale, in order to improve the understanding of the extent and severity of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

This project is a prospective international multicentre study to validate two new rating scales in different languages: the Neuropsychiatric Fluctuations Scale (NFS) and the Shame in PARKinson's disease (SPARK) Scale.

The project population consists a minimum of 300 PD patients with and without fluctuations in the participant countries: Spain, Germany, France, Switzerland, Romania and Greece.

The NFS is specifically designed to detect neuropsychiatric fluctuations between off- and on-medication condition in PD. It is composed of 20 items, 10 items measuring the on-neuropsychological symptoms and 10 items for the off-neuropsychological manifestations. The validation of this scale, based on the most frequently experienced symptoms by the patients, would allow a crucial breakthrough in the improvement of management of PD patients.

Shame and embarrassment are poorly recognized by physicians in PD. PD-related shame and embarrassment may emerge from motor and non-motor symptoms, from self-perception of inadequacy due to loss of autonomy and need for help, or from perceived deterioration of body image. The current available scales are not specific for PD. Based on reports of persons affected with PD and a literature review about shame and stigmatization in PD a 25-items self-questionnaire for shame and embarrassment in PD was created. The scale includes 6 different subscales (1. Shame arising from PD symptoms; 2. Shame arising from the increasing physical dependence and need for help induced by PD; 3. Shame arising from the patient's assumption of breaking certain social rules; 4. Shame arising from the deteriorated body image; 5. Consequence of related shame and embarrassment on patients' health-related quality of life; 6. Stigmatization). The validation of this scale will give a tool for physicians and researchers to better understand the impact of PD on patient's quality of life.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Besançon, France, 25000
        • Completed
        • Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Besançon
  • Germany
      • Dresden, Germany, 01307
        • Completed
        • Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus
  • Greece
      • Thessaloniki, Greece, 541 24
        • Completed
        • Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki
  • Romania
      • Brasov, Romania, 500036
        • Recruiting
        • Transilvania University
  • Spain
      • Burgos, Spain, 09006
        • Completed
        • Hospital Universitario Burgos
      • Madrid, Spain, 28034
        • Completed
        • Ruber International Hospital
  • Switzerland
      • Bern, Switzerland, 3010
        • Completed
        • Insel Gruppe AG University Hospital Bern
  • United Kingdom
      • London, United Kingdom, WC2R 2LS
        • Recruiting
        • King's College London

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The project population consists of PD patients with and without neuropsychiatric fluctuations attending routine visits to movement disorders clinics in the participant countries. Only patients capable of giving informed consent will be considered for participation in this project.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Written informed consent;
  2. PD, according to the MDS criteria;
  3. Age of participants > 30 and < 75 years;
  4. Being fluent in the language in which the scales are applied.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Presence of PD dementia (defined as MoCA score < 24).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Patients with neuropsychiatric fluctuations
PD patients with neuropsychiatric fluctuations (≥ 2 positive answers in QUICK test)
Patients without neuropsychiatric fluctuations
PD patients without neuropsychiatric fluctuations (≤ 1 positive answer in QUICK test)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
NFS score
Time Frame: 2 weeks (2 assessments in a time span of 2 weeks)
2 weeks (2 assessments in a time span of 2 weeks)
SPARK score
Time Frame: 2 weeks (2 assessments in a time span of 2 weeks)
2 weeks (2 assessments in a time span of 2 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Carlos III Health Institute
Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Paul Krack, MD, PhD, Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 3, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 20, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 24, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 29, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 13, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 9, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2020-00303

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings