T Cell Memory Fuels the Innate Response in Chronic CF Lung Disease

September 28, 2022 updated by: National Jewish Health
This study seeks to define the role of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell memory responses in the immunologic failure of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) to clear infections. In a normal host, the immune system clears pathogens upon re-infection more swiftly and efficiently than during an initial infection, in great part due to the recall and effector functions of memory T cells. In CF, far less is understood regarding the response of T cell memory when hosts reencounter antigens, otherwise known as pulmonary exacerbations. Pulmonary exacerbations are pivotal events that lead to a decline in health status among CF patients, with many never recovering to baseline health. CF patients will be recruited from patients followed by the Adult CF Program at National Jewish Health. Following enrollment at the time of antibiotic initiation, blood will be collected at two different time points. The first samples will be collected within 24 hours of starting IV antibiotic therapy. The second blood specimen will be collected at the end of hospitalization, after a minimum of 5 days. At the time of each blood draw, complete blood counts, a sputum sample, and simple spirometry will be measured as part of the standard care of a CF exacerbation. Isolated PBMCs will be stained with antibodies to designate cell surface phenotype. They will then be sorted to identify the T cell population. These cells will be tested on their ability to clear pathogens. The relationship between cellular immune responses and clinical indicators of pulmonary status will be examined by fitting linear mixed models.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
112

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80206
        • National Jewish Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult CF subjects will be recruited from patients followed by the Adult CF Program at National Jewish Health at the onset of an acute pulmonary exacerbation.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Documented diagnosis of CF.
  • Age 18 years old or greater.
  • Hospitalization with planned IV antibiotic treatment for a pulmonary exacerbation of CF.
  • Ability to perform reproducible Pulmonary Function Tests and produce sputum.
  • Willingness to comply with study procedure and willingness to provide written consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of a condition or abnormality that, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator (PI), would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the data.
  • Use of systemic steroids at the start of IV treatment for a pulmonary exacerbation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate CD4+ and CD8+ T cell function during CF pulmonary exacerbation
Time Frame: average 10 days
Prospectively evaluate CD4+ and CD8+ T cell function as measured from the peripheral blood in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and its correlation with improvements in pulmonary inflammation and clinical status during treatment of CF pulmonary exacerbations.
average 10 days
Evaluate CD4+ and CD8+ T cell function during CF pulmonary exacerbation
Time Frame: a period of 60 months
Prospectively evaluate CD4+ and CD8+ T cell function as measured from the peripheral blood in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and its correlation with improvements in pulmonary inflammation and clinical status during treatment of CF pulmonary exacerbations.
a period of 60 months
Test the capacity of enhanced CFTR activity to bolster host inflammatory cell function
Time Frame: average 10 days
Compare CF effector memory responses between those clinically prescribed a CFTR modulator and those not currently on treatment as measured by flow cytometry. The ability of CF effector T cells to control infection over time will change over the subject's lifetime and use of CFTR modulators.
average 10 days
Test the capacity of enhanced CFTR activity to bolster host inflammatory cell function
Time Frame: a period of 60 months
Compare CF effector memory responses between those clinically prescribed a CFTR modulator and those not currently on treatment as measured by flow cytometry. The ability of CF effector T cells to control infection over time will change over the subject's lifetime and use of CFTR modulators.
a period of 60 months
Test the capacity of T cell subsets to control infection over time
Time Frame: average 10 days
Compare CF effector memory responses between those who are infected frequently (2 or more times/year) and those infected infrequently (0-1 times/year) as measured by flow cytometry. The ability of CF effector T cells to control infection over time will change over the subject's lifetime and number of exacerbations.
average 10 days
Test the capacity of T cell subsets to control infection over time
Time Frame: a period of 60 months
Compare CF effector memory responses between those who are infected frequently (2 or more times/year) and those infected infrequently (0-1 times/year) as measured by flow cytometry. The ability of CF effector T cells to control infection over time will change over the subject's lifetime and number of exacerbations.
a period of 60 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National Jewish Health

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 6, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 18, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 20, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 29, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 28, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SAAVED16GO

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings