The Diagnostic Ability of White Light Endoscopy and Magnifying Endoscopy With Optical Enhancement System

September 23, 2020 updated by: Yanqing Li, Shandong University

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Ability of White Light Endoscopy and Magnifying Endoscopy With Optical Enhancement System in Early Gastric Cancer and Intraepithelial Neoplasia: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to valuation of the diagnostic ability of white light imaging and magnifying endoscopy with optical enhancement system in early gastric cancer and intraepithelial neoplasia.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Stomach cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death. Endoscopic identification and treatment of gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) and early gastric cancer (EGC) is essential to improve patients' 5-year survival rates. Conventional endoscopy with white light imaging (WLI) is widely used for endoscopic evaluation of EGCs. However, conventional endoscopic visualization of EGCs has a high rate of interobserver variability and correlates poorly with the histological findings. For this reason, diagnosis has been based mostly on repeated endoscopy with multiple biopsy samples. It has been reported that optical enhancement (OE) system is useful for discriminating cancerous lesions from non-cancerous lesions. The OE system is the newly developed image-enhanced endoscopic technology, which combines high definition white light endoscopy (WLE) and optical filters that limit the spectral characteristics of the illumination light. The optical filters can achieve higher overall transmittance by connecting the peaks of the hemoglobin absorption spectrum creating a continuous wavelength spectrum. Magnifying endoscopy is useful for observing the mucosal structures and microvessels. The VS theory proposed by Yao K is widely used in Magnifying endoscopy with optical enhancement system (ME-OE). Based on technical considerations, it is conceivable that ME-OE imaging techniques might have a distinct advantage over WLE in the diagnosis of endoscopic lesions. However, few reports have objectively proved that ME-OE is superior to WLE in the detection rate and diagnostic efficiency of EGCs.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
300

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China, 250012
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 18-80 years with H. pylori infection or histologically verified gastric lesions (chronic atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, GIN or EGC)
  • Or patients aged 40-80 years from a region with high incidence of gastric cancer
  • Or patients aged 40-80 years with first-degree relative of patients with gastric cancer
  • Or patients aged 40-80 years with high-risk factors for gastric cancer (high salt or pickle diet or smoking or heavy drinking)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A history of gastrectomy
  • Active gastrointestinal bleeding or advanced gastric carcinoma
  • Coagulopathy or severe underlying diseases
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Absence of informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Magnifying endoscopy with optical enhancement system group
Patients in this group go through gastroscopy under the magnifying endoscopy with optical enhancement system.
Device: magnifying endoscopy with optical enhancement system
A complete screening examination was first performed with white light endoscopy. Additionally, the types of endoscopic GIN and EGC were recorded according to the Paris Classification. After visualization in white light mode, the stomach was reinspected by using OE mode2. Then, in vivo diagnoses of lesions were made by using OE mode1 according to VS theory. For all suspicious areas, a minimum of one biopsy specimens were first taken in a targeted fashion.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: white light endoscopy group
Patients in this group go through gastroscopy under white light endoscopy.
Device: white light endoscopy system
A complete screening examination was first performed with white light endoscopy. Additionally, the types of endoscopic GIN and EGC were recorded according to the Paris Classification. For all suspicious areas, a minimum of one biopsy specimens were first taken in a targeted fashion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
detection rate of GIN and EGC
Time Frame: 3 months
The primary outcome was the detection rate of gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) and early gastric cancer (EGC) in a per-patient analysis.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
sensitivity, specificity of diagnostic performances of GIN and EGC
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
positive predictive value of diagnostic performances of GIN and EGC
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
negative predictive value of diagnostic performances of GIN and EGC
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
diagnostic accuracy in a per-biopsy analysis
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Shandong University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Yanqing Li, MD, PhD, Shandong University Qilu hosipital, China

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 24, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 1, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 2, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 25, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 23, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2018SDU-QILU-125

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings