Remote-by-Default Care in the COVID-19 Pandemic

March 31, 2022 updated by: University of Oxford

Remote-by-Default Care in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Addressing the Micro-, Meso-, and Macro-level Challenges of a Radical New Service Model

18 month study, funded by ESRC COVID-19 research fund. The aim is to explore and support the rapid shift from face-to-face to remote (telephone and video) conversations in primary care. There are three components: a study of clinical interactions and decision making (micro); four locality-based organisational case studies of new models of care (meso); abd a a study of how digital innovation can support NHS infrastructure and vice versa (macro).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

18 month study, funded by ESRC COVID-19 research fund. The aim is to explore and support the rapid shift from face-to-face to remote (telephone and video) conversations in primary care. There are three components: a study of clinical interactions and decision making (micro); four locality-based organisational case studies of new models of care (meso); abd a a study of how digital innovation can support NHS infrastructure and vice versa (macro). The methods are mainly qualitative (interviews, virtual ethnography, analysis of documents, micro-analysis of conversations) and are designed to inform action research.

Key deliverables:

At least two evidence-based assessment tools: qualitative (questions for remote assessment of breathlessness) and quantitative (a COVID-19-specific early warning score)

Transferable lessons about how to achieve rapid spread and scale-up, spread in real time through our extensive intersectoral networks

Strengthened infrastructure for supporting digital innovation in the NHS

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

103

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Mixed methods study

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inclusion criteria for interviews

Willing and able to give informed consent for participation

Aged 18 years or above

Staff involved in delivering remote-by-default services in the frontline or 'back offices'

Patients/carers who have crossed paths with primary care services during the Covid pandemic.

Pharmacy case studies:

Staff involved in delivering remote pharmacist consultation services in the frontline or 'back offices'

Patients/carers who have crossed paths with community pharmacy primary care services during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Inclusion criteria for video and telephone consultations

Patients who have remote primary care consultation regarding symptoms associated with COVID-19 and their clinicians (based in Oxford/Thames Valley) who have agreed to participate in the study

Inclusion criteria for focus groups

Patients that have experienced self-reported 'long Covid' symptoms (for patient only focus groups)

Clinicians that have experienced self-reported 'long Covid' symptoms (for clinician only focus groups)

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients or clinicians who are too ill to be interviewed

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Remote assessment tools
Qualitative methods: semi-structured interviews for approx 40 front line clinical practitioners
RECAP early warning score
Development of disease specific early warning score, building on earlier work through literature review and NEWS2 score
Implementation/Scale up case studies
Study of implementation and scale up of remote-by-default at four different UK sites
Infrastructure strengthening
Theory and data driven change effort involving policymakers, regulators, professional bodies, industry, patients and citizens with a view to overcoming interacting issues impacting success of digital projects.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Remote COVID-19 Assessment in Primary Care (RECAP) Early warning score
Time Frame: 18 months
A set of questions and a predictive tool built into electronic records, designed to distinguish people with suspected covid-19 who need to go to hospital from those who can safely be monitored at home. The final Remote COVID-19 Assessment in Primary Care (RECAP) Early warning score score divides people into 'green' (stay at home, self-monitor), amber (professional monitoring e.g., via virtual wards with home oximetry), or red (assess in person promptly).
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 13, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 27, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 16, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 283196

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID-19

Search Similar Trials