Partial Versus Total Fundoplication in the Surgical Repair of Para-esophageal Hernia.

August 28, 2021 updated by: Lars Lundell, Karolinska University Hospital

Partial Versus Total Fundoplication in the Surgical Repair of Para-esophageal Hernia. Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Short-term follow up after surgery of para-esophageal hernia comparing two different types of fundoplication

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Laparoscopic para-esophageal hernia (PEH) repair has been established as a safe and effective treatment for symptomatic patients. Today, most surgeons agree that a fundoplication should be included in the hiatal reconstruction in order to reduce the risk of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux and hernia recurrence. However, what type of wrap that should be recommend is yet to be determined.

One might argue that the overall durability and effectiveness of a partial fundoplication in the control of reflux might be less reliable than a total wrap, but on the contrary, the latter carries the risk of inducing a pseudoachalasia similar situation in PEH patients.

We therefore designed a double blind randomized clinical trial in which patients with symptomatic paraesophageal hernia to receive either a posterior partial (Toupet) or total (Nissen) fundoplication after hernia reduction and crural repair.

Six months follow up with questionnaires, 24-hour pH monitoring and radiology after surgery of para-esophageal hernia with addition of total fundoplication vs posterial partial fundoplication.

Dysphagia Scores; Ogilvie dysphagia score and Watson dysphagia score. Quality of Life; SF-36: physical and mental component scores.

Time points: 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
70

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Sweden
      • Stockholm, Sweden
        • Ersta Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing acute or elective surgery for symptomatic PEH at Ersta Hospital and Karolinska University Hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age below 18 years
  • axial sliding hiatal hernia only (type I)
  • missing informed consent
  • previous hiatal hernia surgery
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score IV or above
  • achalasia
  • Zollinger-Ellison syndrome
  • malignant tumor
  • inability or unwillingness to complete questionnaires

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Nissen fundoplication
Addition of 360 fundoplication after crural closure
Procedure: Addition of 360 fundoplication after crural closure
A total fundoplication was constructed in which the right and left part of the wrap was brought together in front of, and slightly to the right of the esophagus, and sutured with three interrupted stitches of 2-0 unabsorbable sutures from the GEJ and cranially to attain a length between the top and bottom sutures of at the most 2 cm. At least one wrap suture included the esophageal muscle-wall.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Toupet fundoplication
Addition of 180 posterior fundoplication after crural closure
Procedure: Addition of 180 posterior fundoplication after crural closure

The wrap was pulled dorsally around the distal part of the esophagus and GEJ, which was encircled approximately 180-200 degrees. First, the wrap was anchored with Gore-tex sutures, dorsally to the left crus with 3 sutures and then to the right crus with another 3 sutures.

Finally, the wrap was completed with 3-4 sutures, between the edges of the wrap and the right and left side of the esophageal wall, respectively.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ogilvie dysphagia score
Time Frame: 6 months
The Ogilvie dysphagia score is a 5-graded scale 0-4 defined as follows: '0', ability to eat ordinary diet; '1', ability to swallow solid food; '2', ability to swallow semisolids; '3', ability to swallow liquids; '4', total inability to swallow .
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
intra-and postoperative courses
Time Frame: 6 mohths
Peri and postoperative complications.
6 mohths
length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 6 months
postoperative length of hospital stay
6 months
Watson dysphagia score
Time Frame: 6 months

Watson dysphagia score is a validated instrument for benign dysphagia where the patient is asked whether he/she always, sometimes or never has difficulty swallowing nine different groups of liquid and food items.

This gives a score ranging from zero to 45, where 45 represents the worst possible dysphagia.
6 months
Acid reflux control
Time Frame: 6 months
24-hour pH monitoring
6 months
Quality of Life (SF-36)
Time Frame: 6 months
The Swedish version of this validated global questionnaire is presented as physical and mental summary component scores (PCS and MCS, respectively). Each subscale scores reaches a value of at the most 100, where higher values reflect better health status.
6 months
Radiology
Time Frame: 6 months
Radiologically verified recurrent hiatal hernia
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Karolinska University Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Ersta Hospital, Sweden

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Lars Lundell, professor, Karolinska Institutet

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 16, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 16, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 28, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2008/179-31

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastro Esophageal Reflux

Clinical Trials on Addition of 360 fundoplication after crural closure

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings