Effects of the Addition of Uterosacral Ligament Plication to Pectopexy Operation on Anatomical and Subjective Symptoms
Effects of the Addition of Uterosacral Ligament Plication to Pectopexy Operation on Anatomical and Subjective Symptoms in the Treatment of Apical Compartment Defects
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Erzurum, Turkey, 25100
- Gamze Nur Cimilli Senocak
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients with stage II-IV apical compartment defect according to the POP-Q classification
Exclusion Criteria:
- having severe chronic disease that makes the operation dangerous
- patients under 25 and patients over 75 years old
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: pectopexy group
this group will only have pectopexy operation
|
Vaginal cuff or uterine cervix will be attached to iliopectineal ligament with polypropylene mesh on both sides.
|
|
Active Comparator: Pectopexy and uterosacral ligaments plication group
this group will have pectopexy operation with bilateral uterosacral ligaments plication
|
Vaginal cuff or uterine cervix will be attached to iliopectineal ligament with polypropylene mesh on both sides.
At least 2/3 of the sacrouterine ligaments will be shortened with helical sutures, starting from the cervix and so douglas will be partially obliterated.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
questionnaire of lower urinary tract symptoms
Time Frame: changes in symptoms for each title at the preoperative day 1 and postoperative day 3 period
|
the questionaire examines these titles by scoring from one to ten points:
|
changes in symptoms for each title at the preoperative day 1 and postoperative day 3 period
|
|
evaluation of sexual function with Women's Sexual Function Index
Time Frame: changes at the preoperative day 1 and postoperative day 40 period
|
Women's Sexual Function Index is a questionnaire about sexual functions of the women.
the index definex sexual functions with some questions and scorings.
|
changes at the preoperative day 1 and postoperative day 40 period
|
|
Stage of apical compartment defect according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP-Q) classification
Time Frame: changes in the stage of apical compartment defect at the preoperative day 1 and postoperative day 3 period according to POP-Q clasification
|
Stage of apical compartment defect according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP-Q) classification
|
changes in the stage of apical compartment defect at the preoperative day 1 and postoperative day 3 period according to POP-Q clasification
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
evaluation of sexual function with Women's Sexual Function Index
Time Frame: changes at 3,6 and 12. month after surgery
|
Women's Sexual Function Index is a questionnaire about sexual functions of the women.
the index definex sexual functions with some questions and scorings.
|
changes at 3,6 and 12. month after surgery
|
|
Stage of apical compartment defect according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP-Q) classification
Time Frame: changes at 3,6 and 12. month after surgery
|
Stage of apical compartment defect according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP-Q) classification
|
changes at 3,6 and 12. month after surgery
|
|
questionnaire of lower urinary tract symptoms
Time Frame: changes in symptoms for each title at 3,6 and 12. month after surgery
|
the questionaire examines these titles by scoring from one to ten points:
|
changes in symptoms for each title at 3,6 and 12. month after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gamze Nur Cimilli Senocak, Ataturk University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- B.30.2.ATA.0.01.00/6
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.