Healing After Connective Tissue Graft Harvesting in the Palatal Area With and Without Suture
Healing After Connective Tissue Graft Harvesting in the Palatal Area With and Without Suture: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Caba
-
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Caba, Argentina, 1405
- Maimonides University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria
- Subjects with an indication of mucogingival surgery for single gingival recession treatment that required harvesting a subepithelial connective tissue graft
- Age >18 years ≤ 60 years.
- Periodontally and systemically healthy.
- Palatal fibromucosa width ≥ 2mm evaluated with a North Carolina probe placed perpendicular to the hard palate, prior to surgery.
Exclusion Criteria
- Smoking.
- Contraindications for periodontal surgery.
- Subjects presenting coagulation disorders (history of Haemophilia, von Willebrand disease or anticoagulant therapy).
- Subjects taking medications known to interfere with periodontal tissue health or healing.
- Subjects that had been operated on the palate (connective tissue removed) previously from that same donor area.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Suture Group
After harvesting a subepithelial connective tissue graft using the single incision technique collagen haemostatic sponge placement and subsequent compression with gauze soaked in saline for 5 minutes, a cross- mattress suture and interrupted single sutures were performed using nylon 5-0 when appropriate.
|
A SCTG was harvested using the single incision technique described by Hürzeler & Weng.
The palatal incisions were standardized to extend between the area between mesial of the canine and mesial of the first molar.In the Suture Group sites a cross- mattress suture and interrupted single sutures were performed using nylon 5-0 when appropriate.
In the no Suture Group sites, no suture was performed.
In both groups, a CHS was placed after removing the graft to achieve the haemostasis of the palate and subsequent compressed with gauze soaked in saline for 5 minutes.
|
|
Experimental: no Suture Group
After harvesting a subepithelial connective tissue graft using the single incision technique, collagen haemostatic sponge placement and subsequent compression with gauze soaked in saline for 5 minutes no suture was performed.
|
A SCTG was harvested using the single incision technique described by Hürzeler & Weng.
The palatal incisions were standardized to extend between the area between mesial of the canine and mesial of the first molar.In the Suture Group sites a cross- mattress suture and interrupted single sutures were performed using nylon 5-0 when appropriate.
In the no Suture Group sites, no suture was performed.
In both groups, a CHS was placed after removing the graft to achieve the haemostasis of the palate and subsequent compressed with gauze soaked in saline for 5 minutes.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Early healing index
Time Frame: Day 7 post surgery
|
1. Complete flap closure without fibrin line at the palate; 2. Complete flap closure with fibrin line at the palate; 3. Complete flap closure with small fibrin clot(s) at the palate; 4. Incomplete flap closure with partial necrosis of the palatal tissue; 5. Incomplete flap closure with complete necrosis of the palatal tissue.
|
Day 7 post surgery
|
|
Early healing index
Time Frame: Day 14 post surgery
|
1. Complete flap closure without fibrin line at the palate; 2. Complete flap closure with fibrin line at the palate; 3. Complete flap closure with small fibrin clot(s) at the palate; 4. Incomplete flap closure with partial necrosis of the palatal tissue; 5. Incomplete flap closure with complete necrosis of the palatal tissue.
|
Day 14 post surgery
|
|
Early healing index
Time Frame: Day 30 post surgery
|
1. Complete flap closure without fibrin line at the palate; 2. Complete flap closure with fibrin line at the palate; 3. Complete flap closure with small fibrin clot(s) at the palate; 4. Incomplete flap closure with partial necrosis of the palatal tissue; 5. Incomplete flap closure with complete necrosis of the palatal tissue.
|
Day 30 post surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of participants with immediate bleeding
Time Frame: immediately postsurgery
|
An embedded gauze with saline was pressed on the palate wound for 5 minutes in both groups.
Positive iB was recorded if once the gauze was removed, bleeding persisted.
Compression was repeated as many times as necessary until bleeding was arrested.
If this maneuver was not enough, additional actions should be performed to stop bleeding and the patient would be excluded from the study.
|
immediately postsurgery
|
|
Number of participants with delayed bleeding
Time Frame: 7 days post surgery
|
Any type of bleeding from the palatal area reported during the postoperative period was recorded as positive
|
7 days post surgery
|
|
Pain level / discomfort
Time Frame: first week after surgery,
|
Pain level / discomfort experienced at the surgical site of the palate, was self-reported by the subject and registered with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
It was required to the subject to graduate their sensitivity using a scale of 10 cm marked in mm between 0 and 100, labelled numerically from 0 to 10. Zero corresponds to "no discomfort" and 10 "unbearable pain".
All other possible adverse effects were also recorded.
|
first week after surgery,
|
|
Pain level / discomfort
Time Frame: second week after surgery,
|
Pain level / discomfort experienced at the surgical site of the palate, was self-reported by the subject and registered with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
It was required to the subject to graduate their sensitivity using a scale of 10 cm marked in mm between 0 and 100, labelled numerically from 0 to 10. Zero corresponds to "no discomfort" and 10 "unbearable pain".
All other possible adverse effects were also recorded.
|
second week after surgery,
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Mariel V Gómez, Assoc Prof, Maimonides University
- Principal Investigator: Guillermo Schinini, Assoc Prof, Maimonides University
- Study Chair: Hugo J Romanelli, Chair Prof, Maimonides University
- Principal Investigator: Diego Sales, Assist Prof, Maimonides University
- Principal Investigator: Leandro Chambrone, Chair Prof, Ibirapuera University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Del Pizzo M, Modica F, Bethaz N, Priotto P, Romagnoli R. The connective tissue graft: a comparative clinical evaluation of wound healing at the palatal donor site. A preliminary study. J Clin Periodontol. 2002 Sep;29(9):848-54. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.290910.x.
- Wessel JR, Tatakis DN. Patient outcomes following subepithelial connective tissue graft and free gingival graft procedures. J Periodontol. 2008 Mar;79(3):425-30. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070325.
- Lorenzana ER, Allen EP. The single-incision palatal harvest technique: a strategy for esthetics and patient comfort. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000 Jun;20(3):297-305.
- Hurzeler MB, Weng D. A single-incision technique to harvest subepithelial connective tissue grafts from the palate. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1999 Jun;19(3):279-87.
- Maino GNE, Valles C, Santos A, Pascual A, Esquinas C, Nart J. Influence of suturing technique on wound healing and patient morbidity after connective tissue harvesting. A randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Aug;45(8):977-985. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12960. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
- Stavropoulou C, Atout RN, Brownlee M, Schroth RJ, Kelekis-Cholakis A. A randomized clinical trial of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives in donor site of connective tissue grafts. J Periodontol. 2019 Jun;90(6):608-615. doi: 10.1002/JPER.18-0475. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
- Fickl S, Fischer KR, Jockel-Schneider Y, Stappert CF, Schlagenhauf U, Kebschull M. Early wound healing and patient morbidity after single-incision vs. trap-door graft harvesting from the palate--a clinical study. Clin Oral Investig. 2014 Dec;18(9):2213-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1204-7. Epub 2014 Feb 23.
- Lektemur Alpan A, Torumtay Cin G. PRF improves wound healing and postoperative discomfort after harvesting subepithelial connective tissue graft from palate: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Jan;24(1):425-436. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02934-9. Epub 2019 May 18.
- Rossmann JA, Rees TD. A comparative evaluation of hemostatic agents in the management of soft tissue graft donor site bleeding. J Periodontol. 1999 Nov;70(11):1369-75. doi: 10.1902/jop.1999.70.11.1369.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2310/18
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.