Comparative Study Between CellFX and Electrodessication in Sebaceous Hyperplasia (SH) Lesions

April 1, 2024 updated by: Pulse Biosciences, Inc.

A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Comparison IDE Study Between the Pulse Biosciences CellFX System and Electrodessication (Hyfrecator Electrosurgical) for the Treatment of Sebaceous Hyperplasia (SH) Lesions

This study is designed as a multi-center, single-blinded, prospective, randomized, study to compare the safety and effectiveness of the CellFX System to the comparator group, Electrodessication for the treatment of SH lesions in healthy adult subjects.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This SH comparative study will evaluate safety and efficacy in a split face design using the CellFX System and pre-defined energy profile for all primary and secondary treatments based on Fitzpatrick Skin Types and tip size. The comparator group will be treated with the same standardized intralesional electrodesiccation procedure conducted by all participating clinical sites. Subjects with 4-10 qualifying SH lesions on the face except the scalp, nose and within the orbital region will be enrolled. Each subject will be evaluated by the blinded site investigator at 7-days, 30-days, and 60-days post-initial CellFX and Electrodessication treatments. At the 30-day follow-up visit, lesions will be evaluate using Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), for eligibility to receive an additional treatment. In case of a second treatment, the subject will be evaluated by the blinded site investigator at 30-days and 60-days post-retreatment. Photography of the study lesions will be captured along with the blinded site investigator assessments at all visits.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85255
        • Investigate MD, LLC
    • Minnesota
      • Edina, Minnesota, United States, 55424
        • Zel Skin & Laser Specialists
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28207
        • Dermatology, Laser & Vein Specialists of the Carolinas, PLLC
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77056
        • Austin Institute for Clinical Research, Inc.
      • Pflugerville, Texas, United States, 78660
        • Austin Institute for Clinical Research, Inc.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is at least 21 and no older than 80 years of age.
  • Subject gives voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this clinical investigation and from whom consent has been obtained.
  • Subject must comply with study procedures including follow-up visits.
  • Subject is willing to have SH lesions treated in a single treatment session and understands that their lesion(s) may undergo a second treatment session at a subsequent visit.
  • Subject must have a minimum of four SH lesions and up to 10 SH lesions to be treated and the subject must have at least two SH lesions located on each side of the face.
  • For study purposes, the SH lesions must be no greater than 2 mm in height and must not exceed 5 mm x 5 mm at their largest dimension. The subject's lesions cannot be located within the eye orbit, nose, or scalp.
  • Subject consents to have photographs taken of the SH lesion(s).
  • Subject agrees to refrain from using all other lesion removal products or treatments (e.g. retinols, retinoids, and exfoliating products) to the treated SH lesions or any new SH lesions during the study period.
  • Subject agrees to refrain from prolonged sun exposure during the study period.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has an implantable electronic medical device.(i.e., pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator)
  • Subject has an active infection or history of infection in designated test area within 90 days prior to first treatment.
  • Subject is not willing or able to sign the Informed Consent.
  • Subject is known to be immune compromised.
  • Subject is prone to developing hypertrophic scars or to be a keloid producer.
  • Subject has allergies to Lidocaine or Lidocaine-like products.
  • Subject is employed by the sponsor, clinic site, or entity associated with the conduct of the study.
  • Have any condition or situation which, in the Investigator's opinion, puts the subject at significant risk, could confound the study results, or may interfere significantly with the subject's participation in the study.
  • Use of any other investigational drug, therapy, or device within the past 30 days of enrollment or concurrent participation in another research study.
  • Subject was previously treated with CellFX for SH lesions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: CellFX System
The CellFX System consists of a electrical pulse console combined with a handpiece coupled with a sterile single patient-use treatment tip (1.5 x 1.5mm, 2.5 x 2.5mm, and 5.0 x 5.0mm). Based on the size of the SH lesion and treatment tip used, a predetermined treatment energy setting is selected to deliver a sequence of electrical pulses to the SH lesion area directly beneath the treatment tip.
Device: CellFX System
CellFX System consists of a console combined with a handpiece and coupled with a sterile single patient-use treatment tip (1.5 x 1.5mm, 2.5 x 2.5mm, and 5.0 x 5.0mm)
Active Comparator: Intralesional Electrodesiccation
Intralesional Electrodesiccation involves using a Hyfrecator electrosurgical unit and a non-insulated epilation needle electrode to apply a high-frequency electric current within the lesion.
Device: Intralesional Electrodesiccation
Hyfrecator electrosurgical unit with a non-insulated needle-shaped electrode

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Lesions With Improvement as Assessed With the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
Time Frame: 60 days post last CellFX or Electrodessication treatment, up to a maximum of 3 months.
Percentage of SH Lesions with Improvement as Assessed by Blinded Investigator During Live Assessments based on Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). The Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale ranges from 1=Very Much Improved or Excellent Corrective Result to 5=Worsened Appearance Compared with Original Condition. The primary effectiveness endpoint of improvement at 60-days post-last treatment as assessed "live" by the blinded site investigator using the 5-point GAIS
60 days post last CellFX or Electrodessication treatment, up to a maximum of 3 months.
Percentage of Lesions With Hyperpigmentation, Hypopigmentation and Scarring as Assessed by Blinded Investigator During Live Assessments
Time Frame: 60 days post last CellFX or Electrodessication treatment, up to a maximum of 3 months.
The first co-primary safety endpoint includes the percentage of lesions showing hyperpigmentation and scarring as assessed by the blinded Investigator at 60 days after the last treatment with CellFX or Electrodessication
60 days post last CellFX or Electrodessication treatment, up to a maximum of 3 months.
Percentage of Lesions With Skin Textual Changes as Assessed by Blinded Investigator During Live Skin Assessment
Time Frame: 30 days post last CellFX or Electrodessication treatment, up to a maximum of 2 months
The second co-primary safety endpoint of skin textural changes including; flaking, erythema, crusting, scabbing, or other skin irregularities was assessed by the blinded site investigator at 30 days post last CellFX or Electrodessication treatment.
30 days post last CellFX or Electrodessication treatment, up to a maximum of 2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Pulse Biosciences, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Richard Nuccitelli, PhD, Pulse Biosciences, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 28, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 2, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 18, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 31, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 31, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 25, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 1, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NP-SC-012

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings