3D-printed Implant Overdentures
Clinical Evaluation of Implant Overdentures Fabricated Using 3D -Printing Technology Versus Conventional Fabrication Technique: A Randomized Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Giza, Egypt
- Msa Uni
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- completely edentulous
- ranging in age from 50 to 65 years
- Angle's class I skeletal relationship, normal facial symmetry.
- Adequate quantity of bone (class IV -VI ) and quality (classes 1 - 3 ) in the mandibular inter-foraminal area to accommodate standard implants of at least 11 mm length and 3.7 mm diameter
- appropriate inter-arch space of at least 15 mm (class I ) to accept all types of tested dentures
Exclusion Criteria:Metabolic disorders affecting osseointegration such as hepatic disorders
- osteoporosis and diabetes mellitus.
- Temporomandibular disorders, anticoagulant therapy or bleeding disorders
- sharp mandibular residual ridge or flabby tissues
- neuromuscular disorders, and class II and III Angle's classification skeletal relationship
- Smokers and patients on chemotherapy or radiotherapy or suffering from psychiatric conditions
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: control
conventionally manufactured Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) mandibular implant overdentures
|
The bite registration records with their corresponding master casts were digitalized using an extra oral desktop 3D scanner (3shape D850) and then stored as standard triangulation language (STL) files (Figure 1).
The STL files were then imported to Dental system PREMIUM3 design software (3Shape Dental System 2018) for model analysis, surveying and blocking out, designing full permanent denture bases, and for virtual teeth set-up following the recorded inter-arch space
|
|
Experimental: intervention
digital light processed (DLP)-printed photo-polymerizable PMMA Nextdent mandibular implant overdentures
|
The bite registration records with their corresponding master casts were digitalized using an extra oral desktop 3D scanner (3shape D850) and then stored as standard triangulation language (STL) files (Figure 1).
The STL files were then imported to Dental system PREMIUM3 design software (3Shape Dental System 2018) for model analysis, surveying and blocking out, designing full permanent denture bases, and for virtual teeth set-up following the recorded inter-arch space
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
. OHRQoL (oral health related quality of life)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Oral Health Impact Profile 19 (OHIPEDENT19) was used to assess the OHRQoL (oral health related quality of life).
The questionnaire was translated to Arabic and validated (S2).24
The profile consisted of 19 questions each with score 0 to 4 (impaired) on Likert scale; accordingly, for each patient the minimum score was 0 and maximum score was 76.
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Overdentures' retention
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The retention was measured at baseline (day of delivery), three months thereafter, after six months then after 12m by a digital force gauge device (Extech's Model 475055 Digital Force Gauge FLIR Commercial Systems, Inc.) that measures tension or compression force (pull/push) to values of up to 980 Newton.25
The snap hook of the device engaged a screw fixed to the geometric center of denture bases using self-cure acrylic resin.
Then pulling action was applied till the denture separation recording the amount of retention in Newton.
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Dina Elawady, PHD, MSA
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Modern Science and Art Uni
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.