Development of Fecal Scoring for the Management of Fecal Impaction With Regards to Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction

August 9, 2021 updated by: Kwanjin Park, Seoul National University Hospital
The role of bowel bladder disorder, or BBD, has been highlighted as a major player in vesicoureteral reflux and urinary tract infection (UTI). However, the diagnosis of BBD are still conceptual and subjective, because of the diagnosis of constipation, main pathophysiology in BBD has not been established well.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Functional constipation is a common disorder among children, accounting for 3-5% of visits to pediatric clinics and even 10% to 25% of consultation for pediatric gastroenterologists. It could cause recurrent abdominal pain, stool retention as well as fecal incontinence. In the urologic field, this is known to develop urinary symptoms. Constipation has been associated with voiding dysfunction and urinary tract infection in children. It is assumed that impacted stool in distal rectum mechanically affect the bladder leading to detrusor overactivity. Additionally, impacted stool would elevate the uretheral sphincter tone, having patients void with incomplete sphincter relaxation and eliciting dysfunctional voiding. Stool impaction may be the source of bacteria causing urinary tract infection and led to recurrent bacteriuria. Treatment of constipation by itself is quite effective alleviating urologic symptoms in as much as two-third of the patients.

The role of constipation has been highlighted as a major player in vesicoureteral reflux and urinary tract infection (UTI). The presence of bowel bladder disorder (BBD) was associated with higher risk of breakthrough infection and a lack of spontaneous resolution. Although constipation is the major player in BBC, there is any objective standard regarding the diagnosis and treatment of constipation. Given the high prevalence and morbidity of children affected by UTI or VUR in relations to BBD, it is imperative that diagnostic and treatment methods are developed.

Despite the known implication of constipation, the diagnosis of constipation may be problematic due to a lack of standard definition for this condition. This may be due to different views between clinicians about which aspect are most crucial for diagnosing constipation. Some underline the subjective nature such as infrequent or difficult defecation, other stress the quality of stool, still others were in search of objective criteria of constipation, like the amount of impacted stool or colonic transit time. Consequently, various criteria have been reported.

The lack of standard criteria for constipation causes trouble sometimes in making a proper decision for diagnosis, intervention, follow-up, and discharge of treatment.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
187

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 13 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who visited the department of pediatric urology for significant lower urinary tract dysfunction with history suggestive of constipation.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with having both significant Lowery Urinary Tract Dysfunction history suggestive of constipation (more than two positive criteria in ROME 4).
  • Parental recalling of hard stool (Bristol stool scale of 6 or 7).
  • Parental impression of constipation.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Those without Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction or constipation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Fecal Impaction (LUTD-FI)
Patients with both significant Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction history suggestive of constipation were treated with lactitol monohydrate syrup 10 g for eight weeks. Following eight weeks of treatment, patients were re-evaluated and those with 50% of symptom improvement were assumed to have a significant improvement attributable to the development of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction- Fecal Impaction (LUTD-FI).
Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Not Related to Fecal Impaction
Patients with both significant Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction history suggestive of constipation were treated with lactitol monohydrate syrup 10 g for eight weeks. Following eight weeks of treatment, patients were re-evaluated and those without symptom improvement place into lower urinary tract dysfunction not related to fecal impaction (LUTD-FI). They serve as a control group.
Drug: Lactitol Monohydrate
Patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction and assumed to have constipation were placed on lactitol monohydrate 10 g for 8 weeks, and had re-evaluated.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
KUB (Kidneys, Ureters, Bladder)
Time Frame: After 8 weeks from the baseline
Examine the outcomes of the treatment of lactitol monohydrate 10 g in relation to Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction and fecal impaction by using KUB (Kidneys, Ureters, Bladder) x-ray images.
After 8 weeks from the baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Seoul National University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 25, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 2, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 2, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 21, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 5, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 8, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 10, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 9, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2008-133-1150

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bowel Dysfunction

Clinical Trials on Lactitol Monohydrate

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings