Mhealth for PrEP Adherence by Young Adult MSM, Phase 2

December 8, 2023 updated by: Patricia Weitzman, Environment and Health Group, Inc.

Mhealth for Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Adherence by Young Adult MSM

This Phase 2 project aims to enhance and test a mobile health intervention designed to increase adherence to the daily PrEP pill among culturally-diverse young adult men who have sex with men. The intervention will include: a) personalized PrEP pill reminders b) culturally- and developmentally-sensitive text messages targeting patient education, motivation, and stress c) a gamification avatar and d) a linked online community of peers. Effectively promoting PrEP adherence would reduce new HIV infections in this at-risk population, which is subject to health disparities

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The project is to develop and test the effectiveness of an individually-tailored, developmentally- and culturally-sensitive, mobile health (mhealth) PrEP adherence intervention called DOT. The intervention will target culturally-diverse, young adult men, ages 18-35, who have sex with men (YMSM). The recent rise in HIV infection among young people, particularly minority YMSM, points to the value of PrEP uptake and adherence support for YMSM. In PrEP efficacy trials, younger age was the most consistent correlate with low PrEP adherence. Our DOT mhealth intervention reflects a developmental understanding of young adult decision-making, and is uniquely combined with principles from social cognitive theory, positive psychology and behavioral economics. The proposed project is based on Dr. Weitzman's successful Phase 1 trial of DOT, which led to significant improvements in PrEP adherence, PrEP treatment self-efficacy, and intention to follow PrEP treatment guidelines among the YMSM that used DOT for six weeks. Our proposed Phase 2 DOT mhealth intervention is directly responsive to Phase 1 findings by adding: 1) texts targeting motivation, patient education, and stress burden 2) online community for social support 3) linkage to the federal crisis text line 4) virtual avatar 5) cloud-based platform to view user engagement 7) calendar for clinic appointments and pharmacy refills 8) enhanced personalization of pill reminders and 9) enhanced adherence graphing. In Phase 2, we will test the effectiveness of DOT at improving PrEP adherence in a randomized controlled trial.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
108

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States, 02141
        • Environment and Health Group

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria: (self report) Individuals who self-identify as a male, age 18-35, who has sex with men or who self-identify as a bisexual male or a gay male; currently taking PrEP; own a smartphone and desirous of adherence support.

-

Exclusion Criteria: (self report) Males who do not meet the above criteria and/or currently use I.V. drugs.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intervention
Participants in the intervention arm will receive a mobile app to support their daily PrEP adherence.
Other: DOT mobile app
DOT is a mobile phone app that has daily pill reminders and supportive texts, as well as various features designed to support PrEP medication adherence.
No Intervention: Control
Participants in the control group will receive a 2-page PrEP patient education document based information about PrEP from on the CDC website.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wilson Self-reported Medication Adherence Scale
Time Frame: 90 days
The self-reported medication adherence scale, developed by Wilson et al. (2016), is designed to assess self-reported medication adherence to HIV-related and other types of medications. In this study, it was used to assess self-reported PrEP medication adherence. Minimum score=0, maximum=299.9. Higher score means better adherence.
90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PrEP Medication Adherence Self Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: 90 days
This scale was adapted by Kogelman and Weitzman from the Johnson HIV Adherence Self-Efficacy Scale. The PrEP medication adherence self efficacy scale was developed to assess one's confidence in one's ability to adhere to their PrEP medication treatment plan. The minimum score = 0, maximum score =80. Higher score indicates greater PrEP medication adherence self efficacy.
90 days
Intention to Follow PrEP Treatment Guidelines
Time Frame: 90 days
This measure was developed by Kogelman and Weitzman to assess an individual's intention to engage in key behaviors that are recommended while on PrEP treatment, e.g. concomitant use of condoms and testing for HIV every 3 months. The minimum score=0, the maximum score=16. Higher score means greater intention to follow PrEP treatment guidelines.
90 days
PrEP Medication Knowledge Measure
Time Frame: 90 days
This measure was developed by Kogelman and Weitzman to assess an individual's knowledge of PrEP medication through questions about medication purpose, side effects, etc. Minimum score =0, maximum score = 8. Higher score means greater knowledge about PrEP medication.
90 days
Perceived Stress Scale
Time Frame: 90 days
The Perceived Stress Scale, developed by Cohen et al. (1983), is designed to measure the degree to which one perceives situations in one's life as stressful. The minimum score=0, maximum score=40. Higher score indicates higher perceived stress.
90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Environment and Health Group, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 11, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 18, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 8, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • R44MH112221-02 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

We do not plan to make individual participant data available to other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings