Postoperative Scar in the Control Excess of Mobility Induced by Annulus Removal on Inserting a Lumbar Disc Prosthesis
Effect of the Postoperative Prevertebral Scar on Controlling Excess After Removing the Anterior Lumbar Disc Annulus Fibrosus to Implant a Lumbar Disc Prosthesis. Biomechanical and Clinical Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Vicente Vanaclocha, MDPhD
- Phone Number: 438500 + 34 963 13 18 00
- Email: vivava@uv.es; vvanaclo@hotmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Teresa Moratal, Secretary
- Phone Number: 437334 + 34 963 13 18 00
- Email: ceicvalencia_hgv@gva.es
Study Locations
-
-
Valencia
-
Valencia, Valencia, Spain, 46014
- Recruiting
- Hospital General Universitario de Valencia
-
Contact:
- Vicente Vanaclocha, MDPhD
- Phone Number: 438500 +34 963 13 18 00
- Email: vivava@uv.es; vvanaclo@hotmail.com
-
Contact:
- Teresa Moratal
- Phone Number: 437334 +34 963 13 18 00
- Email: ceicvalencia_hgv@gva.es
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Minimum age of 18 years and maximum of 50 years, given that above that age there is usually degenerative pathology of the lumbar joint facets, which can confuse the symptoms and make it difficult to interpret the results.
- Pathology compatible with chronic low back pain accompanied or not by radiculopathy originating in one or a maximum of two degenerated intervertebral discs and without signs of degeneration / osteoarthritis of the lumbar joint facets.
- The type of lumbar pain must be discogenic, that is, worsen in flexion and not in extension, and in loading, as well as having a truncal distribution with possible anterior radiation towards the English or genital region.
- Radiological confirmation by lumbar MRI study of lumbar discopathy of one or a maximum of two lumbar levels.
- Absence in simple radiology studies of signs of vertebral instability or listhesis of the levels to be treated.
- Absence of response for 6 weeks to conservative, non-surgical treatment, or presence of progressive symptoms. The treatment would also be carried out despite the absence of this study and the existence of the study does not condition in any way the treatment of the patients
- Not having undergone any prior treatment of the type of microdiscectomy, laminectomy or lumbar arthrodesis, although these have been carried out at different levels than those involved on this occasion
- Ability of the patient to comply with the proposed monitoring program
- Patient's ability to follow the postoperative care program
- Granting of informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Signs of arthropathy of the lumbar joint facets, osteoporosis, previous interventions on the lumbar spine
- Deformity or instability of the lumbar spine
- Lumbar canal stenosis
- Previous intervention on lumbar spine
- Previous lumbar spinal fracture
- Mobile spondylolisthesis> 2 mm in translation and / or more than 11 ° angular difference with respect to the adjacent level on neutral vertical or flexion-extension radiographs
- Severe osteoporosis
- Spinal metastasis
- Metabolic bone disease that could interfere with the implant or the surgical procedure
- Rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, or other autoimmune disease that affects the musculoskeletal system
- Other conditions or anatomical alterations that make the treatment of the anterior approach to the lumbar spine unfeasible
- Known allergy to stainless steel, titanium or their alloys
- Fixed or permanent neurological deficit
- Active systemic infection at any time or ongoing preventive treatment for it, infection in the surgical site, HIV or hepatitis C
- Abusive drug or alcohol use
- Uncontrolled seizure disorder
- Psychiatric illness that could interfere with your participation in the study
- Participation in a current research study or in the 3 months prior to surgery
- History of malignancy or current malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer), unless the patient has been treated for curative purposes and no clinical signs or symptoms have been observed for at least 5 years
- Obesity (Body Mass Index or BMI> 35)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Anterior annulus removal
In these patients the anterior portion of the annulus fibrosus will be removed when inserting a complete lumbar disc prosthesis
|
Owestry scale, SF12, Facet joint arthritis measured with Pathria scale, discal degeneration measured with Modic and Phirrmann scales
|
|
Active Comparator: Anterior annulus replacement
In these group of patients the anterior portion of the annulus fibrosus will be opened up in to flaps hinged lateraly and replaced once the complete lumbar disc prosthesis is inserted
|
Owestry scale, SF12, Facet joint arthritis measured with Pathria scale, discal degeneration measured with Modic and Phirrmann scales
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Range of spinal segment movement after lumbar disc prosthesis insertion in L4-L5 lumbar disc
Time Frame: One year
|
The investigators will analyze preoperatively and postoperatively at 3, 6 and 12 months the range of movement of the L4-L5 lumbar disc after insertion of a complete lumbar disc prosthesis
|
One year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Auerbach JD, Jones KJ, Milby AH, Anakwenze OA, Balderston RA. Segmental contribution toward total lumbar range of motion in disc replacement and fusions: a comparison of operative and adjacent levels. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Nov 1;34(23):2510-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181af2622.
- Huang YJ, Zhao SJ, Zhang Q, Nong LM, Xu NW. Comparison of lumbar pedicular dynamic stabilisation systems versus fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease: A meta-analysis. Acta Orthop Belg. 2017 Mar;83(1):180-193.
- Frelinghuysen P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr. Lumbar total disc replacement part I: rationale, biomechanics, and implant types. Orthop Clin North Am. 2005 Jul;36(3):293-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2005.02.014.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 101/2020
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.