LOVE Trial: Limits On Vaginal Intercourse After Mid-urEthral Sling (LOVE)

March 18, 2025 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Limits On Vaginal Intercourse After Mid-urEthral Sling (LOVE Trial)

There are no prospective, randomized studies addressing vaginal penetration restrictions following mid-urethral slings. There is a single cohort study examining expedited recovery following vaginal prolapse repair which advised 3-weeks of vaginal penetration restrictions. This study reported an earlier return to intercourse in the 3-week group than in the retrospectively collected control group where 6-weeks of restriction were advised. This study did not evaluate the impact of early versus later return to sexual activity on wound complications, mesh exposure rates, pain or satisfaction.

It is important to develop evidenced-based recommendations on post-operative sexual activity restrictions.

The purpose of this research study is to understand if the "standard" 6-week restriction on vaginal penetration/intercourse after mid-urethral sling affects patient satisfaction

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The lifetime risk of surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women is 13.6%. Women are typically instructed to avoid strenuous physical activity and vaginal penetration for 6 weeks following synthetic mid-urethral sling procedures. The historical rationale behind these instructions was to prevent disruption of vaginal incisions, promote wound healing, decrease recurrence risk and prevent complications such as mesh exposure. Very little medical evidence exists, however, to support these activity restrictions which can have a negative impact on satisfaction and quality of life. Findings from a single randomized trial challenge standard activity restrictions following pelvic organ prolapse repair. Participants were given conservative or liberal postoperative instructions and the liberal group experienced fewer prolapse and urinary symptoms at 3 months postoperatively; but there was no difference in satisfaction between groups. This study, however, did not investigate restrictions on vaginal penetration (both groups adhered to 6-week restrictions) and was not specific to women undergoing isolated sling procedures. There are no prospective, randomized studies addressing vaginal penetration restrictions following mid-urethral slings. There is a single cohort study examining expedited recovery following vaginal prolapse repair which advised 3-weeks of vaginal penetration restrictions. This study reported an earlier return to intercourse in the 3-week group than in the retrospectively collected control group where 6-weeks of restriction were advised. This study did not evaluate the impact of early versus later return to sexual activity on wound complications, mesh exposure rates, pain or satisfaction.

Animal models suggest that wound healing occurs much sooner than 6 weeks post-surgery. In fact, epithelial wounds closed by primary intention typically re-epithelialize in just 24-48 hours. In a mouse-model with full-thickness vaginal injury, there was complete restoration of mucosal integrity by day 7 without surgical closure of the wound. Epithelial healing over mid-urethral sling could differ due to a known pro-inflammatory milieu in the setting of a mesh implant but the rate of epithelial closure over implanted synthetic mesh has not been specifically described. While earlier vaginal penetration could theoretically increase the risk of mesh exposure from the known baseline risk of 2-3%, this is unlikely following two weeks in a low risk population regardless of menopausal status. Vaginal atrophy has been identified as a risk factor for wound healing complications and vaginal mesh exposure and could interact with early resumption of intercourse. However, vaginal atrophy can be reversed with vaginal estrogen therapy and resultant risks mitigated.

Given the prevalence of mid-urethral slings for stress incontinence, it is important to develop evidenced-based recommendations on post-operative sexual activity restrictions. The purpose of this randomized trial, therefore, is to evaluate the impact of early (2 weeks) versus standard (6 weeks) removal of vaginal penetration restrictions in sexually active women undergoing mid-urethral sling procedures on sexual satisfaction and wound complications.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
155

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern Medicine
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28207
        • Atrium Health
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest Health Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 21years of age
  • Women with stress or mixed urinary incontinence who are undergoing a planned, isolated, synthetic mid-urethral sling with cystoscopy via retropubic, transobturator or single-incision approach.
  • Sexually active with ≥1 male or female partner with a frequency of at least once every 2 weeks
  • Ability to comprehend the concept of randomization
  • Willing to remain compliant with the instructions and study follow-up visits

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of prior surgery for incontinence including mid-urethral sling, fascial sling
  • History of prior surgery for prolapse with transvaginal mesh
  • Diabetic with Hgb A1C ≥ 8.0 % (elevated A1C is associated with delayed wound healing12 and 8.0 has been identified as a cutoff over which there are more complications postoperatively13
  • Pregnant
  • Incarcerated
  • History of pelvic radiation
  • Current smoker (known risk factor for mesh exposure)
  • Non-English speaker

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Standard Group
Participants may resume vaginal penetration at 6 weeks.
Behavioral: Standard restriction recommendation
Participants will return to intercourse after 6 weeks
Other: Early Group
Participants may resume intercourse at 2 weeks
Behavioral: Early restriction release
Participants will no longer have restrictions on vaginal penetration 2 weeks after surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participant satisfaction rating
Time Frame: week 12

To determine if there is improved satisfaction with decreased length of restricted vaginal penetration following mid-urethral sling. The primary outcome will be patient satisfaction with ability to return to sexual function as measured on a 5-point Likert scale with the question: "How satisfied were you with your ability to return to vaginal penetration following surgery?"

(1) Strongly disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither agree nor disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly agree
week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of days until resumption of vaginal penetration
Time Frame: week 12
week 12
Number of Wound complications - wound separation
Time Frame: week 12
To determine if there are increased wound complications in patients following isolated mid-urethral sling with shorter duration of restrictions on vaginal penetration.
week 12
Number of Wound complications - mesh exposure
Time Frame: week 12
To determine if there are increased wound complications in patients following isolated mid-urethral sling with shorter duration of restrictions on vaginal penetration.
week 12
Number of Wound complications - mesh erosion
Time Frame: week 12
To determine if there are increased wound complications in patients following isolated mid-urethral sling with shorter duration of restrictions on vaginal penetration.
week 12
Number of Wound complications - granulation tissue
Time Frame: week 12
To determine if there are increased wound complications in patients following isolated mid-urethral sling with shorter duration of restrictions on vaginal penetration.
week 12
Number of Wound complications - vaginal pain
Time Frame: week 12
To determine if there are increased wound complications in patients following isolated mid-urethral sling with shorter duration of restrictions on vaginal penetration.
week 12
Urinary incontinence
Time Frame: week 12
To determine if there is similar continence in patients who resume intercourse early vs standard following isolated mid-urethral sling
week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Catherine A Matthews, MD, Wake Forest Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 16, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 27, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 27, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 23, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 18, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB00070386

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Patient Satisfaction

Clinical Trials on Standard restriction recommendation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings