Spinal Cord Stimulation for Gait Disorders in Parkinson's Disease (SCM-PARK)

October 5, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Grenoble

Spinal Cord Stimulation for Gait Disorders in Parkinson's Disease: a Pilot Study

Our project is based on the fundamental hypothesis that epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) improves Freezing of gait (FOG) in patients with Parkinson's disease. In eight patients implantation of electrodes for SCS at the epidural thoracic level will be performed under general anaesthesia.

Evaluation of gait and motor symptoms will be performed with and without stimulation, after a 3-month period for each of the stimulation conditions.This is a pilot, single centre, prospective, randomized, double blinded, cross-over study.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients will be selected in the Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Grenoble. A preoperative assessment with gait assessment, clinical evaluation and Non-Motor Symptoms assessment will be realized. The implantation of electrodes for SCS at the epidural thoracic level connected to a neurostimulator at the abdominal level will be performed under general anaesthesia. During the first postoperative month, the optimization of SCS parameters will be performed by an experienced movement disorders neurologist.After the first post-operative month the patient will be randomized to the STIM ON condition (stimulation on, with the most effective parameters) or STIM OFF (without stimulation). The randomization will be performed in a double blinded fashion, by a neurologist working in open and not participating in the evaluations. After 3 months, the patient will be evaluated in a double blind condition, and the stimulation condition will be crossed for another period of 3 months. At the end of this second 3-month period, the patient will be again double-blind assessed. After this evaluation, the patient will enter the open phase of the study for a period of 6 months. For this last phase of the study, under STIM ON condition, an optimization of the stimulation settings will be realized, if necessary. At the end of this 6-month period of stimulation, the patient will be evaluated one last time. At all visits, clinical and gait evaluations will be carried out under chronic dopaminergic treatment. No change in antiparkinsonian treatment will be allowed during the entire study. Gait and clinical assessment will be performed at baseline and at the end of each double blinded phase and at 1-year follow-up. For the double-blind study the patient, the neurologist who performs the clinical evaluation and the expert who performs the gait test and analysis will be blind to the stimulation condition.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
6

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Grenoble, France, 38043
        • Chu Grenoble Alpes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Patients with diagnosis of idiopathic PD
  2. Aged 50-85 years
  3. Having a FOG (score> 14 at New-FOG-Questionnaire; score> = 1 at item 2.13 of the Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale) despite the optimization of medical treatment
  4. Drug treatment stable for at least 2 months
  5. Able to give written consent.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Pain syndrome (score> = 2 at item 1.9 of the MDS-UPDRS II)
  2. Psychosis
  3. Severe depression
  4. Severe cognitive impairment (Mini Mental Score Examination <19)
  5. Patient receiving STN DBS treatment
  6. Presence of other neurological or medical pathologies interfering with walking
  7. Subject in period of exclusion from another study
  8. Subject under administrative or judicial supervision
  9. Subject who cannot be contacted in an emergency.
  10. Person with any administrative or judicial measure of deprivation of rights and liberty

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Sham Comparator: OFF STIM
without stimulation
Procedure: Implantation of electrodes for Spinal cord stimulation
The implantation of electrodes for SCS at the epidural thoracic level connected to a neurostimulator at the abdominal level will be performed under general anaesthesia (hospitalization for 3 days in the Neurosurgery Department, CHUGA) in a maximum delay of 1 month following the preoperative assessment. During the first postoperative month, the optimization of SCS parameters will be performed by an experienced movement disorders neurologist.
Active Comparator: ON STIM
stimulation with the most effective parameters
Procedure: Implantation of electrodes for Spinal cord stimulation
The implantation of electrodes for SCS at the epidural thoracic level connected to a neurostimulator at the abdominal level will be performed under general anaesthesia (hospitalization for 3 days in the Neurosurgery Department, CHUGA) in a maximum delay of 1 month following the preoperative assessment. During the first postoperative month, the optimization of SCS parameters will be performed by an experienced movement disorders neurologist.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
frequency and duration of Freezing Of Gait (FOG) episodes, objective
Time Frame: Month 6
gait testing
Month 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
frequency and duration of Freezing Of Gait (FOG) episodes, subjective 1
Time Frame: Month 12
New FOG-questionnaire (NFOG-Q)
Month 12
frequency and duration of Freezing Of Gait (FOG) episodes, subjective 2
Time Frame: Month 12
patient diary
Month 12
impact of spinal cord stimulation on FOG, long term outcome
Time Frame: Month 12
New Freezing Of Gait-questionnaire (NFOG-Q)
Month 12
impact of spinal cord stimulation on quality of life, long term outcome
Time Frame: Month 12
Parkinsons disease questionnaire (PDQ39)
Month 12
impact of SCS on gait during a dual cognitive-motor task test
Time Frame: Month 12
New FOG-questionnaire (NFOG-Q)
Month 12
impact of SCS on other non-motor symptoms
Time Frame: Month 12
SCales for Outcomes in PArkinson's disease - Autonomic Dysfunction (SCOPA-AUT)
Month 12
impact of SCS on gait during timed up and go test
Time Frame: Month 12
timed up and go test
Month 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Grenoble

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Elena MORO, CHUGA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 10, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 11, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 11, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 8, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 18, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 24, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 5, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 38RC20.165
  • 2020-A02361-38 (Other Identifier: ID RCB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings