The Research of AI Assistant Gastroscope Training

October 23, 2021 updated by: Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University

The Research of Artificial Intelligence Assistance System Effectiveness for Novice Endoscopists Gastroscopy Training

In this study, we proposed a prospective study about the effectiveness of artificial intelligence system for gastroscope training in novice endoscopists. The subjects would be divided into two groups. The experimental group would be trained in painless gastroscopy with the assistance of the artificial intelligence assistant system. The artificial intelligence assistant system can prompt abnormal lesions and the parts covered by the examination (the stomach is divided into 26 parts). The control group would receive routine painless gastroscopy training without special prompts. Then we compare the gastroscopy operation score, coverage rate of blind spots in gastroscopy,check the average test score before and after training, training satisfaction, detection rate of lesions and so on between the two group.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In this study, we proposed a prospective study about the effectiveness of artificial intelligence system for gastroscope training in novice endoscopists. The subjects would be divided into two groups. The experimental group would be trained in painless gastroscopy with the assistance of the artificial intelligence assistant system. The artificial intelligence assistant system can prompt abnormal lesions and the parts covered by the examination (the stomach is divided into 26 parts). The control group would receive routine painless gastroscopy training without special prompts. Then we compare the gastroscopy operation score, coverage rate of blind spots in gastroscopy,check the average test score before and after training, training satisfaction, detection rate of lesions and so on between the two group.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
288

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Wuhan, China, 430060
        • Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Novice endoscopists：

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Males or females who are over 18 years old;
  2. After qualified medical education and obtained the Certificate of Chinese medical practitioner;

Exclusion Criterial:

  1. A doctor who has already been trained in gastroenteroscopy;
  2. Doctors without qualified medical education and didn't obtaine the Certificate of Chinese medical practitioner;
  3. The researcher believes that the subjects are not suitable for participating in clinical trials.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: with Artificial intelligence assistant system
The experiment group would receive the training with the help of artificial intelligence assistant system in addition to the common training. The system is an non-invasive AI system which could help the endoscopists to diagnosis and monitor the blind spot during the gastroscope.
Other: Artificial intelligence assistant system
The intervention is the use of the artificial intelligence assistant system in addition to the common training. The system is an non-invasive AI system which could help the endoscopists to diagnosis and monitor the blind spot during the gastroscope.
No Intervention: without Artificial intelligence assistant system
The control group would receive the training without the help of artificial intelligence assistant system. That is, they would receive the common training process.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gastroscopy operation score
Time Frame: three month
Using a professional gastroscopy operation scoring scale, the full score is 100 points, and the score is divided into small items. In this experiment, the effect of training between the two groups was compared by comparing the scores of gastroscopy operation in the experimental group and the control group.
three month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Coverage rate of blind spots in gastroscopy
Time Frame: three month
Evaluate the gastroscope operation videos retained by each physician during the examination, and calculate the coverage of 26 parts of the gastric mucosa in the experimental group and the control group during the examination. The calculation method is: the coverage rate of the blind area of the gastroscopy = the actual number of parts covered by the examination/26 parts of the stomach x 100%.
three month
Check the average test score before and after training
Time Frame: three month
the difference between the theoretical test score after the training and the theoretical test score before the training, the calculation method: the theoretical test score after the training-the theoretical test score before the training.
three month
Training satisfaction
Time Frame: three month
An AI assistant group fills out a questionnaire after training, and determines the satisfaction with AI assistant training through a grading method.
three month
Detection rate of lesions
Time Frame: three month
the detection rate of lesions in the experimental group and the control group by gastroscopy. Calculation method = number of gastroscopes with detected lesions/total number of gastroscopes completed by beginner physicians x 100%.
three month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Honggang W Yu, Doctor, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 23, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 25, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 26, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 20, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 20, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 24, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 26, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 23, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • EA-19-003-19

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings