High Flow Oxygen Therapy in Patients Undergoing Bronchoscopy Under Sedation (BroncHoFlow)

February 10, 2024 updated by: Giuseppe Failla, Cardarelli Hospital

High Flow Oxygen Therapy in Patients With or at Risk of Respiratory Failure Undergoing Felxible Bronchoscopy Under Sedation: a Pilot Study

A reduction of peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) commonly occurs during bronchoscopy and may be associated with both respiratory and cardiac adverse events. The type of breathing assistance that should be delivered to patients, in order to treat and/or to prevent acute respiratory failure, during or after bronchoscopy, is not universally standardized; studies comparing the impact of different respiratory supports on patient's outcome and on hospital resource use are very few. the risk of respiratory failure rises according to the type of procedure (i.e., increased risk with broncho-alveolar lavage and trans-bronchial lung biopsy) and to the use of sedative drugs. Conventional oxygen therapy with nasal cannula, continuous positive airway pressure and non-invasive ventilation are commonly applied during endoscopic procedures. High flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) is a relatively novel device, still under-used in the context of interventional pulmonology, providing an humidified air-oxygen blend up to 60 L/min. HFOT has been reported to be effective for the treatment of both hypoxemic and hypercapnic respiratory failure. The investigators hypothesize that HFOT could be feasible and safe in patients undergoing bronchoscopy under moderate sedation, affected by or at risk of hypoxemic and/or hypercapnic respiratory failure.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Naples, Italy, 80131
        • Giuseppe Failla, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • pH ≥7.30 e PaCO2 >45 mmHg and/or
  • PaO2/FiO2 <300 mmHg o SpO2 <90 percent on room air
  • Patient at risk of respiratory failure (COPD III-IV GOLD stage; OSAS; restrictive lung and chest wall diseases; cardiac failure)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Need of laryngeal mask and/or
  • Patients on NIV for >16 hrs/day and/or
  • pH <7.30 and/or
  • Tracheostomy and/or
  • Recent (<3 months) facial trauma and/or
  • Hemodynamic instability and/or
  • High risk of aspiration and/or
  • Lacerated trachea

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: patients undergoing bronchoscopy under sedation with or at risk of respiratory failure
Device: High Flow Oxygen Therapy (HFOT)
HFOT administration in patients undergoing bronchoscopy under moderate sedation, affected by or at risk of hypoxemic and/or hypercapnic respiratory failure.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of desaturation, defined as SpO2< 90 percent percent for >1 min, <5.
Time Frame: one year
one year
Percent of variation of pH, comparing ABG performed before bronchoscopy with that performed before partecipant's transferral to recovery room.
Time Frame: one year
one year
Percent of variation of PaCO2 variation, comparing ABG performed before bronchoscopy with that performed before partecipant's transferral to recovery room.
Time Frame: one year
one year
Rate of interruption of bronchoscopy because of number of desaturation, defined as SpO2< 90 percent for >1 min, >5.
Time Frame: one year
one year
Number of partecipants requiring an escalation of respiratory support.
Time Frame: one year
one year
Rate of new appearance of hemodynamic instability.
Time Frame: one year
one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
value of Charlson Comobidity Index associated with HFOT failure.
Time Frame: one year
one year
value of Body Mass Index associated with HFOT failure.
Time Frame: one year
one year
value of Borg dyspnea scale associated with HFOT failure.
Time Frame: one year
one year
Number of desaturations, defined as SpO2< 90 percent for >1 min.
Time Frame: one year
one year
Lowest oxygen saturation under HFOT.
Time Frame: one year
one year
Rate of change of HFOT parameters because of desaturation without respiratory acidosis.
Time Frame: one year
one year
Rate of change of HFOT parameters because of desaturation with respiratory acidosis
Time Frame: one year
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cardarelli Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 12, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 24, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 28, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 10, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 00000

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings