Treating Corneal Thinning Conditions With CCL Vario Riboflavin (CXL) (CXL)

May 21, 2021 updated by: Kent Wellish MD

Safety and Effectiveness of the CCL Vario System for Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in Eyes With Corneal Thinning Conditions

Study is testing the efficacy of treating corneal thinning conditions with Vitamin B2 (Riboflavin) and the application on UV Light.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Corneal thinning conditions, i.e. keratoconus or ectasia, weaken the cornea which then causes the front of the eye to bulge out. This results in distorted vision and could eventually result in the need for a cornea transplant. This study proposes to conclude that saturating the cornea with vitamin B2 (Riboflavin) and then applying 365nm wavelength of Ultra Violet Light will result in the various layers of corneal tissue linking together. This cross linking results in a stronger cornea which is designed to halt the progression of keratoconus or ectasia. This treatment is already being successfully used in Europe.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
600

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of central or inferior corneal steepening
  • Axial topography consistent with keratoconus, post-surgical ectasia, or pellucid marginal degeneration
  • Presence of one or more findings associated with keratoconus or pellucid marginal degeneration, such as:
  • Fleischer ring
  • Vogt's striae
  • Decentered corneal apex
  • Munson's sign
  • Rizutti's sign
  • Apical corneal scarring consistent with Bowman's breaks
  • Scissoring of the retinoscopic reflex
  • Crab-claw appearance on topography
  • Steepest keratometry (Kmax) value > or = 47.20 D
  • I-S keratometry difference > 1.5 D on the Orbscan map
  • Posterior corneal elevation > 16 microns
  • Thinnest corneal point < 485 microns
  • Post LASIK/PRK stromal ablation depth < 300 microns or expected keratometry > 47.2 D, or post-PRK/SMILE in keratoconus suspect eyes
  • Bacterial or fungal corneal keratitis persistent and not responding despite > 2 weeks of standard antimicrobial therapy or with rapid progression of corneal thinning, with loss of > 25% corneal thickness
  • Contact Lens Wearers Only:
  • Removal of contact lenses for the required period of time prior to the screening refraction:

Contact Lens Type Minimum Discontinuation Time Soft 1 Week Soft Extended Wear 2 Weeks Soft Toric 3 Weeks Rigid Gas Permeable 2 Weeks per decade of wear

  • Signed written informed consent
  • Willingness and ability to comply with schedule for follow-up visits

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Eyes classified as either normal or atypical normal on the severity grading scheme
  • Corneal pachymetry at the screening exam that is < 400 microns at the thinnest point in the eye(s) to be treated when the transepithelial (isotonic) riboflavin solution alone will be used or < 300 microns when the hypotonic riboflavin will be used.

  • Previous ocular condition (other than refractive error) in the eye(s) to be treated that may predispose the eye for future complications, for example:

    1. History of or active corneal disease (e.g., herpes simplex, herpes zoster keratitis, recurrent erosion syndrome, acanthamoeba, etc.)
    2. Clinically significant corneal scarring in the CXL treatment zone that is not related to keratoconus or, in the investigator's opinion, will interfere with the cross linking procedure
  • Pregnancy (including plan to become pregnant) or lactation during the course of the study
  • A known sensitivity to study medications
  • Patients with nystagmus or any other condition that would prevent a steady gaze during the CXL treatment or other diagnostic tests
  • Patients with a current condition that, in the physician's opinion, would interfere with or prolong epithelial healing

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Cross linking treatment for corneal thinning
Cornea will be saturated with Vitamin B2 (Riboflavin) and then treated with 365 nm wavelength ultra violet light.
Drug: Riboflavin
Corneal cross linking achieved by combination of Riboflavin and ultraviolet light
Other Names:
  • Ultra violet light

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 year
Use a standard eye chart to determine changes in the subject's best Visual Acuity (with glasses or contact) performed by research staff
Baseline and 1 year
Change in Uncorrected Visual Acuity
Time Frame: Baseline and 1 year
Use a standard eye chart to determine changes in the subject's best Visual Acuity (without glasses or contact) performed by clinic technician
Baseline and 1 year
Occurrence of Adverse Events
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Surgeon notes any occurrence of adverse events related to the treatment
Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Kent Wellish MD

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Kent L Wellish, MD, Wellish Vision Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 30, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 21, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 28, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 25, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 21, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 0000 (Centre for care Science, KI, Norrbacka Eugeniastiftelsen)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Unidentifiable patient data and pre- and post-op results will be shared.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings