Evaluation of Blood Volume Analysis- Guided Management of Decompensated Heart Failure

September 28, 2023 updated by: Daxor Corporation
Diuretic therapy is first-line treatment for acute decompensated heart failure. However, accurate assessment and management of patient blood volume is challenged by the limitations of physical exam and surrogate markers for blood volume. The study primary objective is to determine if goal-directed care as quantified by direct Blood Volume Analysis (Daxor BVA-100™) in addition to usual care results in more appropriate treatment and consistent achievement of euvolemia.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Over 6 million Americans suffer from heart failure, one of the most prevalent and deadly diseases in the United States. High rates of rehospitalization and mortality and treatment costs have persisted for decades despite advances in care. Clinical guidelines recommend assessment of blood volume and clinical management to euvolemia or normal blood volume, but standard methods of diagnosing blood volume status have been shown to be unreliable. Blood Volume Analysis (Daxor BVA-100) is based on the gold standard indicator dilution technique. BVA has been used to quantify otherwise undiagnosed blood volume derangements and guide treatment in heart failure and other indications. Also, retrospective analyses have shown that care of heart failure patients guided by BVA is associated with improved rates of rehospitalization and mortality.

The proposed study is a prospective, two-center, parallel design, interventional, single-blinded pilot study of the potential for BVA to positively impact the treatment decisions of ADHF clinicians.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
32

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02130
        • VA Boston Healthcare System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age > 18 years. In accordance with the Inclusion Across the Lifespan policy, Children will be excluded from the proposed study. ADHF is a condition that rarely affects children and Daxor's BVA-100 lack the reference norms for pediatric use.
  2. Admission to the hospital with a primary diagnosis of ADHF.
  3. Able and willing to provide informed written consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Evidence of acute coronary syndrome or myocardial infarction during qualifying ADHF hospitalization.
  2. Evidence of hypertensive crisis or acute valvular regurgitation.

  3. The following has occurred within the last 3 months or is planned within the following 3 months:

    1. Revascularization procedure.
    2. Placement on cardiac transplantation list.
    3. Other major cardiac surgery or other surgery.
  4. Planned intermittent or continuous intravenous positive inotropic therapy.
  5. Severe chronic kidney disease (eGFR<15 ml/min).
  6. Psycho-social factors that interfere with ability to adhere to study procedures (severe dementia, active substance abuse, poorly controlled psychiatric illnesses).
  7. Pregnant women or nursing mothers.
  8. Women of childbearing potential not using adequate birth control methods.
  9. Known hypersensitivity to iodine or eggs.
  10. Participation in another heart failure investigational treatment protocol currently or <30 days prior to enrollment.
  11. Evidence of active bleeding or active hemolysis.
  12. Hemoglobin measured below 7 g/dl or hematocrit measured below 21%.
  13. Patient has received a heart transplant and/or currently treated with mechanical circulatory support.
  14. Patients implanted with invasive hemodynamic monitors (i.e. CardioMEMS).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Standard care group
Blood Volume Analysis will be performed at admission, during inpatient stay if warranted, and prior to hospital discharge. Treating physicians will be blinded to the results and will choose between a low-moderate and high diuretic dose based on usual care clinical assessment of volume status.
Diagnostic test: BVA-100
The BVA-100 is a medical device that calculates human blood volume using the method of tracer dilution. The device utilizes a tracer of human serum albumin tagged with iodine-131 to measure injected intravascularly and a series of timed blood draws. The amount of tracer in each blood draw is used to calculate the unknown blood volume. Data inputs come from the measured characteristics of subject blood samples (hematocrit and tracer concentration) and tracer calibration standards. The package also calculates the subject expected (or ideal) blood volume from physical parameters. Hyper- or hypovolemia, associated red blood cell volumes, and tracer transudation rate are reported, with statistics showing the quality of the results.
Experimental: BVA-guided treatment arm
Blood Volume Analysis will be performed at admission, during inpatient stay if warranted, and prior to hospital discharge. Treating physicians will receive the results and will choose between a low-moderate and high diuretic dose based on measured volume status.
Diagnostic test: BVA-100
The BVA-100 is a medical device that calculates human blood volume using the method of tracer dilution. The device utilizes a tracer of human serum albumin tagged with iodine-131 to measure injected intravascularly and a series of timed blood draws. The amount of tracer in each blood draw is used to calculate the unknown blood volume. Data inputs come from the measured characteristics of subject blood samples (hematocrit and tracer concentration) and tracer calibration standards. The package also calculates the subject expected (or ideal) blood volume from physical parameters. Hyper- or hypovolemia, associated red blood cell volumes, and tracer transudation rate are reported, with statistics showing the quality of the results.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quantitative assessment of progress to euvolemic target for both subjects and controls
Time Frame: Approximately 2 weeks
Accurately quantify levels and changes to blood volume and red blood cell volume in ADHF inpatients during inpatient stay, and use this data to guide diuretic therapy in the treatment arm.
Approximately 2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quantitative assessment of event-based outcome metrics
Time Frame: 30 days post discharge
30-day readmission and mortality outcomes will be quantified for both cohorts.
30 days post discharge
Quantitative assessment of continuous outcome metrics: weight
Time Frame: Approximately 2 weeks
Measure and compare changes to body weight in kilogram
Approximately 2 weeks
Quantitative assessment of continuous outcome metrics: net fluid balance
Time Frame: Approximately 2 weeks
Measure and compare changes to net fluid balance in mL
Approximately 2 weeks
Quantitative assessment of continuous outcome metrics: natriuretic peptide
Time Frame: Approximately 2 weeks
Measure and compare changes to natriuretic peptide in pg/mL
Approximately 2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Daxor Corporation

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center
VA Boston Healthcare System

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jacob Joseph, Boston VA Healthcare System
  • Principal Investigator: Bradley Bart, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Orly Vardeny, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 16, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 21, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 22, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 29, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 28, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • BVA for inpatient HF

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data will primarily be captured from Clinical Report Forms and de-identified data will be transferred from the clinical sites to Daxor for analysis. All PHI used to abstract data will remain on the VA Health System servers and will not be transported outside for any research purpose. In accordance with VA policy, incident reporting of theft, loss of data, loss of storage media, unauthorized access to sensitive data or storage media and non-compliance with security controls will be reported promptly to the study PI, Privacy Officer and Information Security Officer.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will become available as collected throughout the study, and will be available for 18months prior to the completion of the study, for analysis.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on BVA-100

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings