BVA-200 vs BVA-100 Validation Study

January 18, 2024 updated by: Daxor Corporation
The proposed study is a prospective, observational, investigator and patient blinded study comparing the results of blood volume measurement using the FDA-cleared Daxor BVA-100 device to the Daxor BVA-200 device. Data from this study may be pooled with data from studies with similar design conducted at other sites, for the purposes of an FDA medical device submission.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Measurements of human blood volume will be made via the indicator dilution method, using gamma counter readings of the concentration of I-131 in a subject's blood sample taken after radio-iodinated Human Serum Albumin (HSA) has been injected into the bloodstream via venous access. Each subject receiving an injection will have five separate blood samples taken, which will be analyzed separately. Each of the five measurements will be conducted in duplicate with the BVA-100 instrument and the BVA-200 instrument. Sufficient blood will be withdrawn at each phlebotomy to permit such duplicate measurement.

Subjects will be enrolled who have been prescribed a blood volume procedure using the BVA-100, as a result either of their ordinary diagnostic care or of their participation in another study that uses blood volume measurement. Subjects will be adults under treatment for conditions normally associated with the need for volume assessment, such as Heart Failure, or scheduled to receive BVA-100 measurement as part of another study. An effort will be made to ensure a range of ages and a balance of the sexes.

Subjects will be enrolled and consented sequentially. The University of Tennessee Medical Center site will document any patient who is not enrolled in the study sequentially and the reason why or who declines enrollment. Demographics of patients not enrolled will be collected to permit identification of any trends in non-enrollment. We do not anticipate any sequential patient not being offered the opportunity to participate in order to assure that there is no bias in selection of patients ("all-comers").

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

62

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tennessee
      • Oak Ridge, Tennessee, United States, 37830
        • Daxor Corporation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The proposed study will be open to any volunteer meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria listed below. We intend to highlight differential analysis of clinical patients from exemplary disease states (such as congestive heart failure and chronic kidney disease), as well as other population characteristics such as age, sex, race, etc.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age: Over18 years;
  2. Able and willing to provide informed written consent.
  3. Subjects will be enrolled who have been prescribed a blood volume procedure using the BVA-100, as a result either of their ordinary diagnostic care or of their participation in another study that uses blood volume measurement. Subjects will be adults under treatment for conditions normally associated with the need for volume assessment, such as Heart Failure, or scheduled to receive BVA-100 measurement as part of another study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant women or nursing mothers.
  2. Women of childbearing potential not using adequate birth control methods.
  3. Known hypersensitivity to iodine or eggs.
  4. Other clinical basis for precluding the use of radioactive materials.
  5. Has previously been enrolled in, and completed, the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Establish equivalence of BVA-200 to BVA-100
Time Frame: Approximately 6 months.
Comparison of a sufficient number of indicator-dilution volume measurements between BVA-100 and BVA-200 devices to establish substantial equivalence.
Approximately 6 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Establish equivalence of BVA-200 to BVA-100 in TBV, RCV, PV and ATR
Time Frame: Approximately 6 months.

Comparison of a sufficient number of full 5-point time-zero blood volume measurements between BVA-100 and BVA-200 devices, to establish substantial equivalence, including measurement of:

  • Total Blood Volume (TBV)
  • Red Cell Volume (RCV)
  • Plasma Volume (PV)
  • Albumin transudation rate (ATR)
Approximately 6 months.
Filling consistency validation
Time Frame: Approximately 6 months.
Validation of filling consistency of at least 100 whole blood quantitative collection cartridges, in at least 40 sets of 5 samples from the same patient
Approximately 6 months.
Usability
Time Frame: Approximately 6 months.
Validation of the ability of personnel who are not laboratorians to understand the test procedures and perform the measurement after receiving training materials (which may be a combination of written instructions, video instructions, and individual instruction) in the use of the instrument. Usability is evaluated through a User Validation Survey consisting of yes or no questions, as well as questions answered on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), where 5 is the most favorable outcome.
Approximately 6 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jonathan Feldschuh, Daxor Corporation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 23, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 29, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

January 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

IPD will not be made available to other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on BVA-200

3
Subscribe