Postoperative Pain After İntracanal Procedures
Postoperative Pain After İntracanal Procedures Based On Different İrrigation Activation Tecniques: A Randomized, Clinical Trial
Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of different irrigation activation systems on pain after endodontic treatment in molar teeth with irreversible pulpitis.Post-operative pain values of the participants will be recorded and evaluated with the VAS scale.
Postoperative pain values of the techniques will be compared with statistical evaluation.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: yahya güven
- Phone Number: 05314599583
- Email: yahyaguven52@outlook.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy patients ranging between 18 and 60 years in age
- Patients that experienced moderate-to-severe pain represented on a visual analogue scale (VAS)
- Maxillar and Mandibular molar teeth were diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any systemic disease and pregnancy in the patient
- Having used analgesic-anti-inflammatory in the last 12 hours and cortisone for the last 6 months
- The patient has bruxism
- Teeth with severe damage
- Teeth with calcified canals
- Teeth with pain to percussion
- Teeth with periapical radiolucency
- Teeth with root resorption
- Teeth with an immature / open apex
- Teeth with previous RCT
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Conventional Syringe Irrigation Group
During the final irrigation procedure, a 30 - G side vented needle was placed 2 mm shorter than the working length and was applied without agitation.
5 mL of 2.5% NaOCl was applied for 1 minute for each channel.
Each canal was then washed with 2 mL of 17% EDTA for 1 minute.
|
Devices used during root canal irrigation
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Xp Endo Finisher Group
Xp Endo Finisher file was used with VDW Silver (VDW) endomotor at 800 rpm speed and 1 Ncm torque according to the manufacturer's instructions.
The Xp Endo Finisher file was placed in the canal, 2 mm shorter than the working length, and was used with slow movements of 7-8 mm amplitude in the canal during activation.
5 mL of 2.5% NaOCl was applied for 1 minute for each channel.
Each canal was then washed with 2 mL of 17% EDTA for 1 minute.
|
Devices used during root canal irrigation
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: EDDY Group
An EDDY tip of size 25/04 was used for sonic activation.
The EDDY was placed in the duct 2 mm shorter than the working length and the activation process was performed with slow movements with an amplitude of 2-4 mm.
In the irrigation process, 5 mL of 2.5% NaOCI was applied for 1 minute for each channel.
Each canal was then washed with 2 mL of 17% EDTA for 1 minute.
|
Devices used during root canal irrigation
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Endoactivator Group
Medium Endoactivator tip of 25 / .04
size was used for irrigation activation.
Medium type was placed in the canal 2 mm shorter than the working length and activation was performed by making short strokes of 2-3 mm. 5 mL of 2.5% NaOCl was applied for 1 minute for each channel.
Each canal was then washed with 2 mL of 17% EDTA for 1 minute.
|
Devices used during root canal irrigation
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative Pain After İntracanal Procedures Based On Different İrrigation Activation Tecniques: A Randomized, Clinical Trial
Time Frame: one week(7 days)
|
Preoperative pain of the patients before the treatment was recorded with the VAS scale.
Pain levels were classified as 0: no pain, 1-3: mild pain, 4-6: moderate pain, 7-10: severe pain .After the treatment of the patients, a pain assessment form was given to the patient in order to evaluate the postoperative pain.
Patients were asked to mark their pain levels on the VAS scale.
The marking procedure was taught to the patients by a blinded researcher from the groups.
When the patients came to the control appointment, VAS scales were collected and the data were analyzed.
|
one week(7 days)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: yahya güven, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- AfyonkarahisarHSU
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.