The Effects of Different Intensity Training on Dynamic and Static Balance of Elderly
The Effects of Different Intensity Training on Dynamic and Static Balance of Elderly Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Fit House Bukit Rimao
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 65 years old and above.
- Orientation to place, time, and person, able to follow the simple instructions, and perform the exercises.
- Without any health problems that would interfere with their safety or ability to complete high and low-intensity training such as the occurrence of myocardial infarction in the past six months, recent heart attack, uncontrolled hypertension (Blood Pressure >166/96 mm Hg), a broken leg in the past six months, diagnosed osteoporosis, and diagnosed stage three and four of heart failure.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participation in regular balance or lower body resistance training during the past three months (at least twice per week).
- The health issues that might confound the study results, including lower- body neuropathy, stroke within the past year, Parkinson's disease, diagnosed vestibular disorders, severe vision (self-rated vision as poor or very poor even when wearing glasses or contact lenses), and lower- extremity joint replacements.
- Taking the regular medication's impairing balance ability (Antidepressants, Neuroleptics or Benzodiazepines) or muscle strength (Corticosteroids).
- Elderly with dementia
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: High Intensity Training (HIT)
Participants trained at 80-90% of 1RM for 12 weeks, twice per week.
|
High Intensity Training group performed resistance training with the intensity of 80 - 90 % of 1RM with 4 - 6 repetition
|
|
Experimental: Moderate Intensity Training (MIT)
Participants trained at 65-75% of 1RM for 12 weeks, twice per week.
|
Moderate Intensity Training group performed resistance training with the intensity of 65 - 75 % of 1RM with 8 - 10 repetition
|
|
Experimental: Low Intensity Training (LIT)
Participants trained at 50-60% of 1RM for 12 weeks, twice per week.
|
Low Intensity Training group performed resistance training with the intensity of 50 - 60 % of 1RM with 12 - 14 repetition
|
|
No Intervention: Control Group (CG)
Participants did not participate in any training and they advised to do their daily activity
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from Baseline in the Mean of Front Reach Test at 4, 8, and 12 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 4th weeks, 8th weeks, 12th weeks
|
The distance that subject can lean forward measured in centimetre (cm) with measuring tape.
The higher score is better.
The minimum is 5 cm and maximum 50 cm
|
Baseline, 4th weeks, 8th weeks, 12th weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline in the Mean of Lateral Reach Test at 4, 8, and 12 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 4th weeks, 8th weeks, 12th weeks
|
The distance that subject can lean to the side measured in centimetre (cm) with measuring tape.
The higher score is better.
Minimum is 5 cm and maximum is 50 cm
|
Baseline, 4th weeks, 8th weeks, 12th weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline in the Mean of One Leg Stand at 4, 8, and 12 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 4th weeks, 8th weeks, 12th weeks
|
The timed that subject can stand in 1 leg recorded in second using a stop watch.
The higher score is better.
minimum is 1 second and maximum is 30 second
|
Baseline, 4th weeks, 8th weeks, 12th weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline in the Mean of Tandem Stand Test at 4, 8, and 12 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, 4th weeks, 8th weeks, 12th weeks
|
The timed that subject can stand one leg front and one leg back condition recorded in second using a stop watch.
The higher score is better.
Minimum is 1 second and maximum is 30 second
|
Baseline, 4th weeks, 8th weeks, 12th weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- A-GS47732
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.