Eltrombopag Plus Diacerein vs Eltrombopag in Adult ITP

October 17, 2023 updated by: Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

Eltrombopag Plus Diacerein vs Eltrombopag in Adult Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune bleeding disorder with low platelet count. As the first choice of the second-line treatment of ITP, thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) enable long-term remission in 50% to 60% of cases. However, about half of patients have no response or loss of response to eltrombopag due to unknown reasons, which can't be effectively improved by increasing the drug dose. Diacerein is an anthraquinone derivative used to treat joint diseases such as osteoarthritis. We speculate that the addition of diacerein to eltrombopag may offer sensitizer effect and maximize efficacy, which warrants further prospective studies to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy as salvage strategy in ameliorating immune thrombocytopenia.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In this multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial, 98 eltrombopag-inefficient or relapsed ITP patients will be enrolled from five tertiary medical centres in China. Participants will be randomly assigned into the combination group (eltrombopag orally at initial dose of 75 mg daily for 14 days, plus diacerein orally at initial dose of 50 mg bid for 14 days) or the monotherapy group (eltrombopag orally at initial dose of 75 mg daily for 14 days) by masked statisticians in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoints are initial response at D15 without any additional ITP-specific intervention. The secondary outcomes include response at D28, time to response, duration of response, bleeding score, health-related quality of life assessment, and safety issue. This study will compare the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag-diacerein with eltrombopag monotherapy in adults with primary immune thrombocytopenia. We hypothesized that the novel combination of eltrombopag and diacerein might extend eltrombopag efficacy and avoid rapid alteration to less-preferable therapies, especially in the management of the patient refractory to eltrombopag.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
102

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China
        • Qilu Hospital, Shandong University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant must be at least 18 years of age at the time of the screening.
  • Participant may be male or female.
  • Participant has a confirmed diagnosis of ITP according to the 2019 International Working Group assessment at screening.
  • Participant who didn't respond to eltrombopag retreatment (75mg by mouth once a day for 14 days) after eltrombopag previous treatment inefficient or relapsed (platelet count below 30 × 10^9/L or below 2-fold increase from baseline platelet count, or bleeding).
  • Bone marrow biopsy is performed in participants over 60 years to exclude hematological malignancies.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant has evidence of a secondary cause of immune thrombocytopenia (e.g. leukemia, lymphoma, common variable immune-deficiency, systemic lupus erythematosus, autoimmune thyroid disease, past medical history of untreated H. pylori infection) or to drug treatments (e.g. heparin, quinine, antimicrobials, anticonvulsants) or participant has a multiple immune cytopenia, e.g. Evan's syndrome.
  • Participant has clinically life-threatening bleeding (e.g. central nervous system bleeding, menorrhagia with significant drop in hemoglobin). Participant has a history of coagulopathy disorders other than ITP.
  • Participant has a history of arterial or venous thromboembolism (e.g. stroke, transient ischemic attach, myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) within the 6 months prior to randomization or requires anticoagulant treatment.
  • Participant has 12-lead ECG with changes considered to be clinically significant upon medical review at baseline.
  • Participant has severe renal impairment (glomerular filtration rate less than 45ml/min/1.73 m2).
  • Participant has 3 × upper limit of normal of any of the following: alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, or alkaline phosphatase.
  • Participant has received corticosteroids, rh-TPO, romiplostim, or immunosuppression within 4 weeks before screening.
  • Participant with any of the following conditions: severe immunodeficiency, active or previous malignancy, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B or C virus infection, pregnancy or lactation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Combination group
Eltrombopag plus diacerein
Drug: Eltrombopag plus diacerein
In the combination group, eltrombopag will be administered orally at an initial dose of 75mg daily for 14 days, and diacerein will be given orally at an initial dose of 50mg bid concomitantly for 14 days (D1-D14). During treatment period, treating physicians will modify the dosage of trial treatment to maintain participants' platelet count at the range of 50 - 150 × 10^9/L as follows: (1) if platelet count is less than 150 × 10^9/L, continue the original treatment (eltrombopag 75mg daily plus diacerein 50mg bid); (2) if platelet count is between 150 × 10^9/L to 250 × 10^9/L, the treatment will be modified to eltrombopag 50mg daily plus diacerein 50mg bid; (3) if platelet count is over 250 × 10^9/L, original treatment (both eltrombopag and diacerein) need to be stopped, and platelet count should be reexamined every other day, and the treatment (eltrombopag 50mg daily plus diacerein 50mg bid ) will be restarted until platelet count is below 100 × 10^9/L.
Placebo Comparator: Monotherapy group
Eltrombopag monotherapy
Drug: Eltrombopag
In the monotherapy group, eltrombopag also will be administered orally at an initial dose of 75mg daily for 14 days (D1-D14), and the individualized dosage could be modified by treating physicians to maintain participants' platelet count between 50 × 10^9/L to 150 × 10^9/L.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Initial response at Day 15
Time Frame: Day 15
The primary outcomes of this trial are initial responses at Day 15 without any additional ITP-specific intervention. Complete response was defined as a platelet count at or above 100 × 10⁹ cells per L and an absence of bleeding. Partial response was defined as a platelet count at or above 30 × 10⁹ cells per L but less than 100 × 10⁹ cells per L and at least a doubling of the baseline platelet count and an absence of bleeding. No response was defined as a platelet count of less than 30 × 10⁹ cells per L, or less than two-times increase from baseline platelet count, or bleeding.
Day 15

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Response at Day 28
Time Frame: Day 28
Responses were assessed at day 28. Complete response was defined as a platelet count at or above 100 × 10⁹ cells per L and an absence of bleeding. Partial response was defined as a platelet count at or above 30 × 10⁹ cells per L but less than 100 × 10⁹ cells per L and at least a doubling of the baseline platelet count and an absence of bleeding. No response was defined as a platelet count of less than 30 × 10⁹ cells per L, or less than two-times increase from baseline platelet count, or bleeding.
Day 28
Time to response
Time Frame: 28 days
Time to response was defined as the time from treatment initiation to achieve a complete response or a partial response, whichever came first, assessed up to day 28.
28 days
Duration of response
Time Frame: 12 months
Duration of response was defined as the time from achievement of a complete response or a partial response to the loss of response (platelet count <30 × 10⁹ cells per L; measured on two occasions more than 1 day apart or the presence of bleeding).
12 months
Bleeding scores
Time Frame: 12 months
Bleeding symptoms were graded according a standardized bleeding scale specific to primary immune thrombocytopenia on the basis of site and severity of bleeding by Khellaf et al (PMID: 15951296). A modification was made to exclude age from the original scale so that only bleeding symptoms were described. At each visit, we recorded bleeding scores. Routine visits were scheduled once a week for the first 4 weeks and once a month thereafter. Scores ranged from 0 to 59, with higher values indicating higher bleeding risk.
12 months
Health-related quality of life assessment
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Health-related quality of life was assessed using a self-administered immune thrombocytopenia Patient Assessment Questionnaire (ITP-PAQ) at baseline and at week 12. Scores ranged from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating better quality of life.
12 weeks
The number of participants with Adverse events
Time Frame: 12 months
Adverse events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0). At each visit, we recorded adverse events. Routine visits were scheduled once a week for the first 4 weeks and once a month thereafter.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Yu Hou, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 1, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 8, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 17, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Eltrombopag-Diacerein ITP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings