Pilot Study Evaluating the Optimization of the ORBEYE Blue Light Filter During Fluorescence-Guided Resection of Gliomas

June 17, 2021 updated by: Northwell Health
Fluorescence-guided resection using 5-ALA induced tumor fluorescence of malignant gliomas allows for better identification of tumor tissue and more radical resection in select patients and improvements in progression-free and overall survival. With new developments in surgical microscopy, the development of digital exoscopes have provided advanced visualization as well as improvements in ergonomics and accessibility of the surgical field. The use of the exoscope in 5-ALA fluorescence-guided tumor surgery has the potential to enhance the ability of the surgeon to remove brain tumors with high efficacy. While algorithms for use of 5-ALA fluorescence have been optimized for use with traditional microscopes, the use of fluorescence techniques in newer digital exoscopes have not been developed. The primary outcome of the study is to obtain parameters to optimize visualization of fluorescence intensity and perform optimization based on the intensities achieved. The operating ORBEYE exoscope will be fitted with a blue light filter. All experiments will be performed in darkened operating rooms. The ORBEYE exoscope will be set up at constant distances from the target and incident light intensities. The focal distance and light intensity settings will be recorded from the data displayed on the microscope. Patients (experimental group) will receive 5ALA treatment before operation, blue light filter imagining will take place after tacking up dura and prior to direct resection. The expected outcomes of image analysis will be to have a set of exoscope parameters optimized for visualization of 5ALA tissue in different tumor types. This 5ALA characterization of visualization parameters has never been completed on an exoscope. Optimizing ORBEYE exoscope parameters will define a standard in glioma resection using 5ALA under a novel exoscopic filter as well as contribute insight into the use of the fluorescent filter for additional tumor types.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
10

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10075
        • Recruiting
        • Lenox Hill Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Randy D'Amico, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • John Boockvar, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female ≥ 18 years of age
  • Must have a suspected or biopsy-proven glioma (World Health Organization grade II or IV), new or recurrent
  • Indication for craniotomy for removal of a suspected or recurrent brain tumor
  • Karnofsky Performance Scale ≥ 60%
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent or have surrogate consent by legally authorized representative

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female < 18 years of age
  • Porphyria, hypersensitivity to porphyrins
  • Renal insufficiency as defined by a creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL
  • Hepatic insufficiency as diagnosed in preoperative medical clearance evaluation
  • Females of childbearing potential with a positive pregnancy test
  • Nursing women
  • Unwilling or unable to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Patients with new or recurrent malignant gliomas
Diagnostic test: 5ALA exoscopic fluorescence filter
Visualization of tumor tissue with 5ALA will be done in the operating room to localize neoplastic tissue. The operation will be conducted in a standard fashion uninfluenced by the imaging on the ORBEYE exoscope. The ORBEYE exoscope will be used with the blue light filter after tacking up dura upon first visualization of tumor tissue prior to direct resection. Images will be taken prior to, during and at the end of the planned resection. The ORBEYE exoscope will be set up at constant distances from the target and incident light intensities. The focal distance and light intensity settings will be recorded from the data displayed on the microscope. The ORBEYE exoscope or standard operating microscope (depending on surgeon preference) will then be used in the standard fashion of an operative microscope with a fluorescent filter, to assist with surgical resection as per the surgeon's preference. Resection will proceed according to current standard of care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Focal Distance
Time Frame: 6 weeks
To characterize optimal focal distance on the 5ALA fluorescence ORBEYE exoscope microscope during glioma removal
6 weeks
Light Intensity
Time Frame: 6 weeks
To characterize optimal light intensity settings on the 5ALA fluorescence ORBEYE exoscope microscope during glioma removal
6 weeks
Working Angle
Time Frame: 6 weeks
To characterize optimal working angle position on the 5ALA fluorescence ORBEYE exoscope microscope during glioma removal
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Usability of 5ALA exoscope filter as assessed by overall surgery length
Time Frame: 6 weeks
To determine functionality and performance reliability of the blue light excitation filter on the ORBEYE exoscope platform with overall surgery length
6 weeks
Usability of 5ALA exoscope filter as assessed by surgeon qualitative assessment
Time Frame: 6 weeks
To determine functionality and performance reliability of the blue light excitation filter on the ORBEYE exoscope platform with surgeon qualitative assessment
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Northwell Health

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Olympus Corporation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 13, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 11, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 11, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 8, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 17, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 23, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 23, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 17, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2021-SE-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings