Effect of Coolant Spray on Traumatic Rib Pain of Geriatric Patients
The Effect of Coolant Spray on Rib Fracture Pain of Geriatric Blunt Thoracic Trauma Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Erzurum, Turkey
- Ataturk University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Trauma developed in less than 24 hours.
- Presence of rib fractures below 3 (6).
- Rib fractures being limited to a single hemithorax.
- Having a visual analog scale (VAS) score of 5 or more.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to provide informed consent (altered mental state, non-Turkish-speaking).
- Patients with chest injury scores above 11 were excluded from the study because of the insufficiency of this multimodal treatment.
- Having additional trauma-related injuries (including lung contusion, pneumothorax, hemothorax, etc.), skin lesions at the site of trauma, and/or trauma-related pain in multiple regions of the thorax.
- Patients with fractures in ribs 1 and 2 (in terms of the risk of serious injury that may accompany).
- History of regular analgesic usage (such as chronic pain syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis), antiaggregant and anticoagulant drug usage, and/or allergy to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) and narcotic analgesics.
- History of having coagulation disorders, hematologic disease, gastrointestinal bleeding, uncontrolled heart failure, chronic renal failure, chronic liver failure, and chronic lung disease.
- Patients in whom trauma-related complications developed during the ED follow-up, the general condition worsened, vital signs were unstable, and patients that needed to be hospitalized.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: TRIPLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Coolant spray group
Coolant spray (Cryos ®Spray, Phyto Performance, Italy) was applied as suggested by the manufacturer (at a distance of 20 cm from the injured area for 5-10 s).
Saline solution was sprayed for the same duration and at the same distance from the injured area as well.
The first spray application was performed after the initial assessment, and the second spray application was performed at the end of the 30th minute (immediately after the pain level/score measurement).
All patients were given intravenous (IV) dexketoprofen (50 mg in 50 ml standard saline solution) in 5 minutes simultaneously with the first spray application.
The physicians applied the designated treatment protocol for each treatment group.
As a rescue analgesic treatment, patients were scheduled to be given IV fentanyl at a dose of 1 mcg/kg.
|
The coolant spray treatment method is a cryotherapy non-pharmacological treatment choice.
|
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo group
A standard saline solution in a bottle covered with opaque white paper and refrigerated at 4°C was prepared.
Saline solution was sprayed for the same duration and at the same distance from the injured area as well like coolant spray application.
The first spray application was performed after the initial assessment, and the second spray application was performed at the end of the 30th minute (immediately after the pain level/score measurement).
All patients were given intravenous (IV) dexketoprofen (50 mg in 50 ml standard saline solution) in 5 minutes simultaneously with the first spray application.
The physicians applied the designated treatment protocol for each treatment group.
As a rescue analgesic treatment, patients were scheduled to be given IV fentanyl at a dose of 1 mcg/kg.
|
saline solution
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain level
Time Frame: 6 hoursa
|
The study's primary outcome is determined as a ≥50% reduction (clinical effectiveness) according to the initial VAS score
|
6 hoursa
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rescure Medicine
Time Frame: 6 Hourss
|
The secondary outcome variable is the difference between the placebo and coolant spray groups in terms of the frequency of patients that needed at least one dose of rescue treatment during the study period.
|
6 Hourss
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Peek J, Smeeing DPJ, Hietbrink F, Houwert RM, Marsman M, de Jong MB. Comparison of analgesic interventions for traumatic rib fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Aug;45(4):597-622. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-0918-7. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
- Gur STA, Dogruyol S, Kocak AO, Akbas I, Tuncer K, Karabulut H, Cakir Z. Comparison of effectiveness coolant spray and placebo in patients with acute ankle trauma prospective randomized controlled trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Jul;38(7):1458-1462. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.12.054. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
- Farion KJ, Splinter KL, Newhook K, Gaboury I, Splinter WM. The effect of vapocoolant spray on pain due to intravenous cannulation in children: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ. 2008 Jul 1;179(1):31-6. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.070874.
- Waterhouse MR, Liu DR, Wang VJ. Cryotherapeutic topical analgesics for pediatric intravenous catheter placement: ice versus vapocoolant spray. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 Jan;29(1):8-12. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31827b214b.
- Zhu Y, Peng X, Wang S, Chen W, Liu C, Guo B, Zhao L, Gao Y, Wang K, Lou F. Vapocoolant spray versus placebo spray/no treatment for reducing pain from intravenous cannulation: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Nov;36(11):2085-2092. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.03.068. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Ataturk University00001
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.