Pilates Method on Functional Capacity and Blood Pressure of Elderly Women With Type 2 Diabetes

July 2, 2021 updated by: Sérgio Rodrigues Moreira, Universidade Federal do vale do São Francisco

Effect of Short Period of Detraining of the Pilates Method on Functional Capacity and Blood Pressure of Elderly Women With Type 2 Diabetes

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is a chronic inflammatory disease that is associated with loss of functional capacity and increased blood pressure. Coupled with this, there is an increased risk of falls and fractures in patients with T2D. On the other hand, conventional training programs for resistance, aerobic or combined exercises are strongly recommended for people with T2D, as they promote a reduction in the glycemic rate and blood pressure, and an improvement in functional capacity. However, little is known about unconventional training programs such as PILATES (dynamic and isometric muscle actions) on functional capacity and cardiovascular adaptations in T2D.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is a chronic inflammatory disease whose main mechanism of installation is insulin resistance and is associated with loss of functional capacity with consequent fragility and increased blood pressure. Currently, women have the highest prevalence of T2D in Brazil. Previous studies have shown that women are more affected by cases of hospitalization and that they have a higher risk of mortality due to illness. Muscle function and strength in patients with T2D show a reduction compared to healthy and normoglycemic subjects, especially in menopausal women, when estrogen declines with a consequent increase in body fat and decreased muscle quality. Coupled with this, there is a reduction in muscle mass and an increased risk of falls and fractures in patients with T2D. Its association with other factors such as physical inactivity, involuntary weight loss, less muscle strength and slower gait can lead to frailty and limit the performance of basic daily activities. On the other hand, conventional training programs for resistance, aerobic or combined exercises are strongly recommended for people with T2D, as they promote a reduction in the glycemic rate and blood pressure, and an improvement in functional capacity. Unconventional training programs such as PILATES (dynamic and isometric muscle actions) ensure the control of forces that act on the musculoskeletal system, promoting an important improvement in functional capacity and possible cardiovascular adaptations. Additionally, elderly people have pronounced losses of neuromuscular adaptations even in a short period of detraining, compromising gains related to functional capacity and this loss can be even more pronounced in patients with T2D. Therefore, it is also necessary for training professionals to understand the effects of the short detraining period after unconventional exercise programs like PILATES on the functional capacity of elderly women with T2D as well as to understand the effects of the PILATES training on blood pressure or cardiovascular adaptations.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
22

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Present a diagnosis of type-2 diabetes;
  • Do not have severe or decompensated heart disease;
  • Do not have coronary artery disease;
  • Do not have peripheral neuropathy and ulcers in the extremities;
  • Do not have severe skin lesions;
  • Do not have proliferative retinopathy;
  • Do not have insulin therapy;
  • Do not have any health condition that would hinder participation in the exercise sessions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Present some unexpected abnormality in health conditions during the research;
  • Do not participate in more than 80% of the training sessions in the PILATES group.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: PILATES Method Training Group
The PILATES program at moderate intensity lasted 12 weeks, at a frequency of 3 times a week, and with duration of 60 minutes for each exercise session.
Other: PILATES Training
During the PILATES sessions, the practitioner received orientations to to perform slow movements, aware, and combined with the respiratory cycle. The exercises program was performed on a soft ground covered with tatamis. During the program, a set of swiss balls of 45, 55, and 65 cm in size and elastic bands of very moderate resistance were used. Each exercise session was divided into 3 stages, namely (a) global initial static and dynamic stretching (10 minutes); (b) general conditioning (45 minutes) and; (c) relaxation (5 minutes). The amount of series and repetitions per set in exercises, in addition to the intensity required in each session in PILATES is presented in Table 2 of Melo et al. (2020) - Vide reference.
Sham Comparator: CONTROL Group
While the PILATES Group participated in the intervention with physical exercises, the CONTROL group only participated in the functional capacity and blood pressure assessments. However, at the end of the intervention in the PILATES Group, the CONTROL Group was invited to participate in a similar training program.
Other: PILATES Training
During the PILATES sessions, the practitioner received orientations to to perform slow movements, aware, and combined with the respiratory cycle. The exercises program was performed on a soft ground covered with tatamis. During the program, a set of swiss balls of 45, 55, and 65 cm in size and elastic bands of very moderate resistance were used. Each exercise session was divided into 3 stages, namely (a) global initial static and dynamic stretching (10 minutes); (b) general conditioning (45 minutes) and; (c) relaxation (5 minutes). The amount of series and repetitions per set in exercises, in addition to the intensity required in each session in PILATES is presented in Table 2 of Melo et al. (2020) - Vide reference.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in functional capacity in type-2 diabetes
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (week zero) versus 4 weeks of intervention in PILATES Group and CONTROL group
Measurements of functional capacity (time in seconds of execution of the functional tests) in the PILATES and CONTROL groups to be analyzed in the pre-intervention and post-intervention moments.
Pre-intervention (week zero) versus 4 weeks of intervention in PILATES Group and CONTROL group
Change in functional capacity in type-2 diabetes
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (week zero) versus 8 weeks of intervention in PILATES Group and CONTROL group
Measurements of functional capacity (time in seconds of execution of the functional tests) in the PILATES and CONTROL groups to be analyzed in the pre-intervention and post-intervention moments.
Pre-intervention (week zero) versus 8 weeks of intervention in PILATES Group and CONTROL group
Change in functional capacity in type-2 diabetes
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (week zero) versus 12 weeks post-intervention in PILATES Group and CONTROL group
Measurements of functional capacity (time in seconds of execution of the functional tests) in the PILATES and CONTROL groups to be analyzed in the pre-intervention and post-intervention moments.
Pre-intervention (week zero) versus 12 weeks post-intervention in PILATES Group and CONTROL group
Change in functional capacity in type-2 diabetes
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (week zero) versus 4 weeks of detraining post-intervention in PILATES Group and CONTROL group
Measurements of functional capacity (time in seconds of execution of the functional tests) in the PILATES and CONTROL groups to be analyzed in the pre-intervention and detraining moments.
Pre-intervention (week zero) versus 4 weeks of detraining post-intervention in PILATES Group and CONTROL group
Change in functional capacity in type-2 diabetes
Time Frame: Pos-intervention (12 weeks) versus 4 weeks of detraining (4W_DT) in PILATES Group and CONTROL group
Measurements of functional capacity (time in seconds of execution of the functional tests) in the PILATES and CONTROL groups to be analyzed in the post-intervention and detraining moments.
Pos-intervention (12 weeks) versus 4 weeks of detraining (4W_DT) in PILATES Group and CONTROL group
Change in blood pressure in type-2 diabetes
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (week zero) versus 4 weeks of intervention in PILATES Group and CONTROL group
Measurements of systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) in the PILATES and CONTROL groups to be analyzed in the pre-intervention and post-intervention moments.
Pre-intervention (week zero) versus 4 weeks of intervention in PILATES Group and CONTROL group
Change in lood pressure in type-2 diabetes
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (week zero) versus 8 weeks of intervention in PILATES Group and CONTROL group
Measurements of systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) in the PILATES and CONTROL groups to be analyzed in the pre-intervention and post-intervention moments.
Pre-intervention (week zero) versus 8 weeks of intervention in PILATES Group and CONTROL group
Change in blood pressure in type-2 diabetes
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (week zero) versus 12 weeks post-intervention in PILATES Group and CONTROL group
Measurements of systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) in the PILATES and CONTROL groups to be analyzed in the pre-intervention and post-intervention moments.
Pre-intervention (week zero) versus 12 weeks post-intervention in PILATES Group and CONTROL group

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Universidade Federal do vale do São Francisco

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Ilka Yolane TP Andrade, Ms, Federal University of Vale do São Francisco - UNIVASF

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 23, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 28, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 19, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 11, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 2, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 7, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 7, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 2, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 4

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings