Closed-loop Oxygen Control for High Flow Nasal Therapy (HILOOP)
Safety and Efficacy of a Closed-loop Oxygen Control for High Flow Nasal Therapy in ICU Patients: a Randomized Cross-over Study (The HILOOP Study)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Barcelona, Spain, 08035
- Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult (>17yo) patients admitted to the ICU treated with HFNT for at least 8h
- Requiring FiO2 ≥ 30% to keep SpO2 in the target ranges defined by the clinician
- Written informed consent signed and dated by the patient or one relative in case that the patient is unable to consent, after full explanation of the study by the investigator and prior to study participation.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient with indication for immediate continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), noninvasive ventilation (NIV), or invasive mechanical ventilation
- Hemodynamic instability defined as a need of continuous infusion of epinephrine or norepinephrine > 1 mg/h
- Low quality on the SpO2 measurement using finger and ear sensor (quality index below 60% on the Massimo SpO2 sensor, which is displayed by a red or orange colour bar)
- Severe acidosis (pH ≤ 7.30)
- Pregnant woman
- Patients deemed at high risk for need of mechanical ventilation within the next 8 hours
- Chronic or acute dyshemoglobinemia: methemoglobin, carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning, sickle cell disease
- Tracheotomised patient
- Formalized ethical decision to withhold or withdraw life support
- Patient under guardianship
- Patient deprived of liberties
- Patient included in another interventional research study under consent
- Patient already enrolled in the present study in a previous episode of acute respiratory failure
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Oxygen close-loop
Four hours period where the fraction of inspired oxygen delivered will be automatically titrated based on SpO2 values.
|
The Automatic FiO2 option provides automated adjustment of the ventilator Oxygen setting to maintain the patient's SpO2 in a defined target range.
When using the software option, the user defines the SpO2 target range, as well as the SpO2 emergency limits, and the device adjusts the Oxygen setting to keep the patient's SpO2 in the target range.
|
|
Active Comparator: Manual FiO2 adjustment
Four hours period where the fraction of inspired oxygen delivered will be manually adjusted by the healthcare personnel based on SpO2 values.
|
Manual FiO2 adjustment according to SpO2 values
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of time spent in optimal SpO2 range
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
The optimal SpO2 range will be defined according to the SpO2 targets determined by the clinician.
|
4 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of time spent in sub-optimal SpO2 range
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
SpO2 values outside the optimal range but still within an acceptable limit (2-3 percent above and below the optimal range)
|
4 hours
|
|
Percentage of time spent out of range
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
Above or below the suboptimal limits specified at the begginning of the study
|
4 hours
|
|
Percentage of time with SpO2 signal available
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
Time with SpO2 signal available
|
4 hours
|
|
Mean SpO2/FiO2
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
Mean oxygenation value
|
4 hours
|
|
ROX index
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
Is a predictor of HFNT success/failure defined as (SpO2/FiO2)/respiratory rate
|
4 hours
|
|
Percentage of time with SpO2 below 88 and 85 percent
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
Duration of time with SpO2 <85 percent and <88 percent, respectively
|
4 hours
|
|
Number of events with SpO2 below 88 and 85 percent
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
Frequency of SpO2 decreases <85 percent and <88 percent, respectively
|
4 hours
|
|
Mean FiO2
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
Mean fraction of inspired oxygen
|
4 hours
|
|
Percentage of time with FiO2 below 40 percent and above 60%
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
Percentage of time that FiO2 is <40 percent and >60 percent, respectively
|
4 hours
|
|
Number of manual adjustments
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
Frequency of manual adjustments of FiO2
|
4 hours
|
|
Number of alarms
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
Frequency of alarms
|
4 hours
|
|
Patient comfort
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
Comfort score by visual analogic scale (from 0 to 10)
|
4 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Helmerhorst HJ, Roos-Blom MJ, van Westerloo DJ, de Jonge E. Association Between Arterial Hyperoxia and Outcome in Subsets of Critical Illness: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression of Cohort Studies. Crit Care Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1508-19. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000998.
- L'Her E, Dias P, Gouillou M, Riou A, Souquiere L, Paleiron N, Archambault P, Bouchard PA, Lellouche F. Automatic versus manual oxygen administration in the emergency department. Eur Respir J. 2017 Jul 20;50(1):1602552. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02552-2016. Print 2017 Jul.
- Arnal JM, Garnero A, Novotni D, Corno G, Donati SY, Demory D, Quintana G, Ducros L, Laubscher T, Durand-Gasselin J. Closed loop ventilation mode in Intensive Care Unit: a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the numbers of manual ventilator setting changes. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018 Jan;84(1):58-67. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.11963-2. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
- Roca O, Caritg O, Santafe M, Ramos FJ, Pacheco A, Garcia-de-Acilu M, Ferrer R, Schultz MJ, Ricard JD. Closed-loop oxygen control improves oxygen therapy in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients under high flow nasal oxygen: a randomized cross-over study (the HILOOP study). Crit Care. 2022 Apr 14;26(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-03970-w.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- PR(AG)539/2020
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.