MPFC Theta Burst Stimulation as a Treatment Tool for Alcohol Use Disorder: Effects on Drinking and Incentive Salience

March 27, 2026 updated by: Medical University of South Carolina
The purpose of this study is to develop transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), specifically TMS at a frequency known as theta burst stimulation (TBS), to see how it affects the brain and changes the brain's response to alcohol-related pictures. TMS and TBS are stimulation techniques that use magnetic pulses to temporarily excite specific brain areas in awake people (without the need for surgery, anesthetic, or other invasive procedures). TBS, which is a form of TMS, will be applied over the medial prefrontal cortex, (MPFC), which has been shown to be involved with drinking patterns and alcohol consumption. This study will test whether TBS can be used as an alternative tool to reduce the desire to use alcohol and reducing the brain's response to alcohol-related pictures.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

With advances in optogenetic stimulation techniques, preclinical studies have demonstrated that activity in frontal-striatal neural circuits has a causal influence on heavy drinking and alcohol reinstatement. Clinically, however, this research has not yet been translated into a neural circuit based therapeutic technique for patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD). The long term goal of this multidisciplinary research study team is to determine the optimal parameters through which non-invasive transcranial magnetic stimulation can be used to improve alcohol drinking outcomes (abstinence, heavy drinking days) among individuals seeking behavioral treatment for AUD. Building on a foundation of several target identification studies and a small double-blinded clinical trial in treatment-engaged AUD patients performed by the study team in the Charleston Alcohol Research Center, here the investigator proposes a double-blind placebo controlled, randomized study to evaluate the efficacy of theta burst stimulation (TBS) to medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) as a tool to decrease drinking and brain reactivity to alcohol cues among treatment-seeking individuals with AUD. Individuals will be screened initially by the Clinical Intake and Assessment core, then given an opportunity to enroll in this study, provide informed consent, and be randomized to receive real or sham TBS to the mPFC 36 sessions (3x/day on each of 3 days/week over 4 weeks, i.e., 12 days). The scientific premise of this 5 year proposal is that, by modulating the neural circuits that regulate alcohol cue-reactivity it will be possible to increase alcohol abstinence rates and decrease heavy drinking days over a 4 month period. With the combined scientific expertise in brain stimulation, neuroimaging, alcohol use disorder research in the Charleston Alcohol Research Center, and clinical practice at MUSC, the study team is uniquely suited to develop this critical line of research. The outcomes of the proposed Aims will provide an evidence-based foundation for a multisite clinical trial and will hasten progress towards developing a new neural circuit based treatment for patients with AUD.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
86

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29401
        • Recruiting
        • Medical University of South Carolina
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lisa McTeague, PhD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 21-65 (to maximize participation; note: Scalp-to-Cortex distance will be included as a covariate to calculate adjusted TMS dose given expected cortical atrophy in heavy alcohol users and older adults and the demonstrated effect50 on TMS-fMRI responses in addiction)
  • Alcohol Use Disorder, determined by DSM-V criteria, using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V
  • Consumption of more than 14 drinks (women) or 21 drinks (men) per week, with at least 4 heavy drinking days (defined as ≥ 4 drinks for women and ≥ 5 for men) per week during the 30-days prior to enrolling.
  • Able to read and understand questionnaires and informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has metal placed above the neck
  • Is at elevated risk of seizure (i.e., has a history of seizures, is currently prescribed medications known to lower seizure threshold)
  • Has a history of moderate to severe alcohol withdrawal or medicated alcohol withdrawal
  • Has a history of claustrophobia
  • Has a history of chronic migraines
  • Has a history of traumatic brain injury, including a head injury that resulted in hospitalization, loss of consciousness for more than 10 minutes, or having ever been informed that they have an epidural, subdural, or subarachnoid hemorrhage
  • Has an unstable medical illness requiring planned medical/surgical intervention (e.g. chemotherapy, surgical procedure)
  • Medications: Is currently taking or initiates a new prescription for drugs known to improve alcohol drinking treatment outcomes (e.g. naltrexone, acamprosate, topiramate) or taking psychiatric/sleeping medications except for stable (1 month) antidepressants/SSRI's. [Note: this criterion is for scientific rather than safety or patient comfort reasons].
  • Has a history of substance use disorder (other than nicotine) by DSM-V criteria in the past 6 months
  • Meets DSM V criteria for panic disorder, bipolar disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, schizophrenia, dissociative disorders, eating disorders, and any other psychotic disorder. [Note: The inclusion of participants with other affective and anxiety disorders is essential because of the marked frequency of the co-existence of mood and other anxiety disorders among patients with AUD at large]
  • Has current suicidal ideation or homicidal ideation
  • Females of childbearing potential who are pregnant (by urine HCG), nursing, or who are not using a reliable form of birth control.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Real TBS to the mPFC
For continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), participants will receive 3 sessions of stimulation per visit over the left medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) (each train: 3 pulse bursts presented at 5Hz, 15 pulses/sec, 600 pulses/session, 60 sec intertrain interval; 120% RMT, MagPro; 10-15 min inter session interval) using a figure 8 coil (Coil Cool-B65 A/P).
Device: Real TBS to the mPFC
This will be delivered with the Magventure Magpro system; 600 pulses of continuous theta burst stimulation with the active sham coil (double blinded using the integrated active sham system).
Sham Comparator: Sham TBS to the mPFC
The MagVenture MagPro system has an integrated, active sham which passes current through two surface electrodes placed on the scalp. The electrodes will be placed on the left frontalis muscle for all sessions. A patient identification card will randomize participants to receive either real or sham stimulation. This system maintains blinding by a gyroscope in the coil which indicates to the clinical staff whether the coil should be rotated up or down for this participant once the card is entered into the machine. One side of the coil is active, the other is sham. The integrity of the double-blind procedure will be assessed by asking the patients and study personnel rate their confidence regarding whether they thought they received real or sham (scale 1-10).
Device: Sham TBS to the mPFC
This will be delivered with the Magventure Magpro system; 600 pulses with the active sham coil (double blinded using the integrated active sham system). The MagVenture MagPro system has an integrated active sham that passes current through two surface electrodes placed on the scalp. The electrodes are placed on the left frontalis muscle under the coil for both the real and sham stimulation sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Percent Heavy Drinking Days (PHDD) from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 1), Post-treatment (4-weeks from baseline), 1-month post treatment (Follow-up #1), 2-months post treatment (Follow-up #2), 3-months post treatment (Follow-up #3)
The primary outcome analysis will examine the TMS treatment effect (active vs. sham) on drinking outcomes-measured as percent heavy drinking days (PHDD) (heavy drinking day defined as 4 or more drinks for women and 5 or more drinks for men)-in the follow-up period beginning after the final treatment session. Collected via timeline follow back (TLFB) in three 28-day (month) intervals, this will be analyzed using multivariate mixture models to consider the effect of time (month after treatment) and the interaction of treatment with time, baseline drinking, number of treatment sessions received, and any other potential covariates (e.g., age, nicotine use, time since last drink). Drinking data will be collected on all randomized participants, irrespective of treatment completion. Lower percentages indicate fewer heavy drinking days in the 28-day interval.
Baseline (Week 1), Post-treatment (4-weeks from baseline), 1-month post treatment (Follow-up #1), 2-months post treatment (Follow-up #2), 3-months post treatment (Follow-up #3)
Change in Percent Days Abstinent (PDA) from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 1), Post-treatment (4-weeks from baseline), 1-month post treatment (Follow-up #1), 2-months post treatment (Follow-up #2), 3-months post treatment (Follow-up #3)
The primary outcome analysis will examine the TMS treatment effect (active vs. sham) on drinking outcomes-measured as percent days abstinent (PDA) - in the follow-up period beginning after the final treatment session. Collected via timeline follow back (TLFB) in three 28-day (month) intervals, this will be analyzed using multivariate mixture models to consider the effect of time (month after treatment) and the interaction of treatment with time, baseline drinking, number of treatment sessions received, and any other potential covariates (e.g., age, nicotine use, time since last drink). Drinking data will be collected on all randomized participants, irrespective of treatment completion. Higher percentages indicate increased days abstinent from alcohol in the 28-day interval.
Baseline (Week 1), Post-treatment (4-weeks from baseline), 1-month post treatment (Follow-up #1), 2-months post treatment (Follow-up #2), 3-months post treatment (Follow-up #3)
Change in alcohol cue task MRI activation 1-week post treatment from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 1), Post-treatment (4-weeks from baseline)
For the alcohol cue reactivity task, multivariate mixture model analyses will be used to calculate the difference in activation between the ALC and BEV blocks for vmPFC and ventral striatal ROIs, and to analyze maximum likelihood estimates for ALC vs. BEV activation as a function of time, treatment, and the cross-level interactions of these factors. Specifically, the cue task stimuli will be nested within time (post- vs. pre-treatment scan); time will be nested within participant; and participants will be nested within treatment (Sham vs. Active).
Baseline (Week 1), Post-treatment (4-weeks from baseline)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in anxiety via State-Trait Anxiety Inventory from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 1), Post-treatment (4-weeks from baseline), 1-month post treatment (Follow-up #1), 2-months post treatment (Follow-up #2), 3-months post treatment (Follow-up #3)
As an exploratory analysis, anxiety will be measured using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory to assess the impact of treatment on self-reported comorbid affective psychopathology. Scoring ranges from 20-80 for each subscale, with higher scores indicating higher anxiety symptoms.
Baseline (Week 1), Post-treatment (4-weeks from baseline), 1-month post treatment (Follow-up #1), 2-months post treatment (Follow-up #2), 3-months post treatment (Follow-up #3)
Change in alcohol use via Obsessive-Compulsive Drinking Scale from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 1), Post-treatment (4-weeks from baseline), 1-month post treatment (Follow-up #1), 2-months post treatment (Follow-up #2), 3-months post treatment (Follow-up #3)
As an exploratory analysis, alcohol craving will be measured using the Obsessive-Compulsive Drinking Scale to assess the impact of treatment on self-reported obsessive-compulsive aspects of craving. Scoring ranges from 0-40, with 0 indicating a higher ability to control drinking. This questionnaire also includes an obsessive sub-scale and a compulsive sub-scale each ranging from 0-20, with lower scores indicating lower aspects of alcohol craving and higher ability to control these urges.
Baseline (Week 1), Post-treatment (4-weeks from baseline), 1-month post treatment (Follow-up #1), 2-months post treatment (Follow-up #2), 3-months post treatment (Follow-up #3)
Change in depression via Becks Depression Inventory-II from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 1), Post-treatment (4-weeks from baseline), 1-month post treatment (Follow-up #1), 2-months post treatment (Follow-up #2), 3-months post treatment (Follow-up #3)
As an exploratory analysis, depression will be measured using the Becks Depression Inventory-II to assess the impact of treatment on self-reported comorbid affective psychopathology. Scoring ranges from 0-63, with higher scores indicating higher levels of depressive symptoms.
Baseline (Week 1), Post-treatment (4-weeks from baseline), 1-month post treatment (Follow-up #1), 2-months post treatment (Follow-up #2), 3-months post treatment (Follow-up #3)
Change in alcohol use via Alcohol Audit from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 1), Post-treatment (4-weeks from baseline), 1-month post treatment (Follow-up #1), 2-months post treatment (Follow-up #2), 3-months post treatment (Follow-up #3)
As an exploratory analysis, alcohol severity will be measured using the Alcohol AUDIT assessment to assess the impact of treatment on self-reported alcohol severity. Scoring ranges from 0-40, with 40 indicating a higher risk of alcohol severity.
Baseline (Week 1), Post-treatment (4-weeks from baseline), 1-month post treatment (Follow-up #1), 2-months post treatment (Follow-up #2), 3-months post treatment (Follow-up #3)
Changes in cognitive performance from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 1), Post-treatment (4-weeks from baseline)
Individual domains of the cognitive test battery will be tested as well as a linear composite to ascertain potential effects in specific domains as well as broader cognitive function. The same multivariate mixture model analyses will be performed on a composite measure of neurocognitive behavioral performance (assessed at baseline and end of treatment phase) to assess whether the TMS treatment affects neurocognitive performance.
Baseline (Week 1), Post-treatment (4-weeks from baseline)
Changes in Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale from baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 1), Weekly throughout treatment (Weeks 1-4), Post-treatment (4-weeks from baseline)
The same multivariate mixture model analyses will be performed on the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale assessed weekly during treatment to examine whether hedonic tone/natural reward responsivity is influenced by active TMS.
Baseline (Week 1), Weekly throughout treatment (Weeks 1-4), Post-treatment (4-weeks from baseline)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Medical University of South Carolina

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 6, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 3, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 10, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 27, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 00102709
  • 2P50AA010761-26 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings