Ultrasound Versus Fluoroscopy Guided Superior Hypogastric Plexus Block in Cancer Bladder Patients

October 18, 2021 updated by: National Cancer Institute, Egypt

Ultrasound Versus Fluoroscopic Guided Superior Hypogastric Plexus Block in Cancer Bladder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Pelvic cancer pain is a chronic condition related to the involvement of viscera, pelvic muscular structures or neural structures by tumor. The superior hypogastric plexus block is a sympathetic block used to treat pelvic visceral pain that is unresponsive to oral or parenteral opioids different approaches for superior hypogastric block as transdiscal approach, classic approach, Posteromedial approach, CT guided approach and ultrasound anterior approach The ultrasound-guided superior hypogastric plexus neurolysis technique (anterior approach) is simple to perform. We believe this block can be useful in cancer patients who are having difficulty in lying prone, because it is a procedure performed in the supine position and it is less time-consuming. It also avoids the radiation exposure involved with a computed tomography-guided and fluoroscopy posterior approach.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Aim of the study:

To compare Fluoroscopic guided transdiscal superior hypogastric block and Ultrasound guided superior hypogastric block regarding their efficacy to control pelvic pain and

Statistical analysis:

Data will be described as mean ±SD or as frequencies (number of cases) and percentages when appropriate. Comparison of numerical variables between two study groups will be carried out using parametric and non-parametric t- tests for independent samples. Within group comparison of numerical variables was carried out using repeated measures ANOVA. P values of less than 0.05 will be statistically significant. All statistical calculations are performed using statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS, version 23 for Microsoft Windows; SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA)

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Recruiting
        • National Cancer Institute
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 20 years.
  • Patients with advanced stage cancer bladder.
  • Patient with severe pain (VAS) 7 or more .
  • Patients don't receive any strong opioids for pain at least 2 weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal.
  • Local infection at the puncture site.
  • Coagulopathy.
  • Cognitive disorders.
  • Unstable cardiovascular disease.
  • History of psychiatric disorders.
  • History of drug abuse.
  • Patients allergic to medication used.
  • Patients with any contraindications to drugs and dye used.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Fluoroscopy-guided superior hypogastric plexus block transdiscal approach
fluroscopy guided superior hypogastric plexus block transdiscal approach for chronic pain treatment in cancer bladder VAS score and morphine consumption are measured before and after 1 day , 1 month , 3 monthes
Procedure: Fluoroscopy-guided superior hypogastric plexus block transdiscal approach
Patient lies prone, L5-S1 interspace identified under fluoroscopy, the skin is prepared and sterile drapes are placed after local anesthetic infiltration of the skin the subcutaneous tissue with 2% lidocaine a 20 guage, 15 cm needle with short bevel is inserted at the center of L5- S1 interlaminar space under anteroposterior fluoroscopic vision. The needle is then advanced toward the intervertebral disc. After confirmation, the needle is advanced through the intervertebral disc until it exists at its anterior surface confirmed by administration of 4 ml of soluble contrast media in both lateral and anteroposterior fluoroscopic view. Neurolysis is performed with 8 ml 8 % phenol solution. After neurolysis, 0.5 ml of saline is given to avoid the deposition of phenol within the intervertebral disc material. While withdrawing, the needle cephazoline 50 mg in 1 ml is injected into the disc.
Other Names:
  • fluroscopy
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: ultrasound-guided superior hypogastric plexus block
ultrasound guided superior hypogastric plexus block in treatment of chronic pain in cancer badder VAS score and morphine consumption are measured before and after 1 day , 1 month , 3 monthes
Procedure: ultrasound-guided superior hypogastric plexus block
Patients are placed in the supine position and after sterilization, the low-frequency curved probe is used in the longitudinal axis to visualize the aortic bifurcation and is identified using a longitudinal Ultra-Sound (Phillips Healthcare, Andover, Massachusetts, US). Next, the probe is placed deeply transverse till aorta end and bifurcation seen of iliac vessels once seen we enter out of plane and inject.as it lies in front the vertebral body of the L5 vertebra. Local infiltration with 1% lidocaine is obtained at port of entry 1-1.5 inches below the umbilicus. A 15-cm, 22-G Chiba needle is inserted (out-of-plane) and advanced by avoiding vascular structures until contact with the L5-body. The needle will be withdrawan the 1-2 mm and inject 8 ml 8% phenol in saline. Finally, 0.5 ml of lidocaine is injected during Chiba needle removal
Other Names:
  • ultrasound

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analogue scale (VAS) score
Time Frame: Three months after the procedure

Pain Intensity measured by Visual analogue scale score16 (A 100 mm horizontal line version is used with 2 ends left end means no pain and right end means the worst pain.

VAS will be recorded before and after the procedure, at the first day, after 1 month and after 3 months.
Three months after the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The amount of daily morphine consumption
Time Frame: Three months after the procedure

Daily morphine or other drugs consumption according to WHO ladder after the procedure.

This will be recorded before and after the procedure, at the first day, after 1 month and after 3 months.
Three months after the procedure
Patient functional capacity
Time Frame: Three months after the procedure

Patient functional capacity (is evaluated using Eastern cooperative oncology group "ECOG" scoring (0=fully active, 1= able to perform light effort, 2= in bed <50% of the day 3=in bed >50% of the day, 4=bed ridden).

This will be recorded before and after the procedure, at the first day, after 1 month and after 3 months.
Three months after the procedure
Quality of life
Time Frame: Three months after the procedure

Patient quality of life SF-36 19 (consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.

This will be recorded before and after the procedure, at the first day, after 1 month and after 3 months.
Three months after the procedure
Complications
Time Frame: Three months after the procedure
Any complications will be detected: back pain, bleeding, infection, L5 root injury with paresthesia or motor weakness, and visceral or vascular injuries.
Three months after the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National Cancer Institute, Egypt

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Khaled Mostafa, National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 30, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 18, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 19, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 18, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AP2103-30101R

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Chronic

Clinical Trials on Fluoroscopy-guided superior hypogastric plexus block transdiscal approach

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings