Ultrasound Versus Fluoroscopy Guided Superior Hypogastric Plexus Block in Cancer Bladder Patients

October 18, 2021 updated by: National Cancer Institute, Egypt

Ultrasound Versus Fluoroscopic Guided Superior Hypogastric Plexus Block in Cancer Bladder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Pelvic cancer pain is a chronic condition related to the involvement of viscera, pelvic muscular structures or neural structures by tumor. The superior hypogastric plexus block is a sympathetic block used to treat pelvic visceral pain that is unresponsive to oral or parenteral opioids different approaches for superior hypogastric block as transdiscal approach, classic approach, Posteromedial approach, CT guided approach and ultrasound anterior approach The ultrasound-guided superior hypogastric plexus neurolysis technique (anterior approach) is simple to perform. We believe this block can be useful in cancer patients who are having difficulty in lying prone, because it is a procedure performed in the supine position and it is less time-consuming. It also avoids the radiation exposure involved with a computed tomography-guided and fluoroscopy posterior approach.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Aim of the study:

To compare Fluoroscopic guided transdiscal superior hypogastric block and Ultrasound guided superior hypogastric block regarding their efficacy to control pelvic pain and

Statistical analysis:

Data will be described as mean ±SD or as frequencies (number of cases) and percentages when appropriate. Comparison of numerical variables between two study groups will be carried out using parametric and non-parametric t- tests for independent samples. Within group comparison of numerical variables was carried out using repeated measures ANOVA. P values of less than 0.05 will be statistically significant. All statistical calculations are performed using statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS, version 23 for Microsoft Windows; SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Recruiting
        • National Cancer Institute
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 20 years.
  • Patients with advanced stage cancer bladder.
  • Patient with severe pain (VAS) 7 or more .
  • Patients don't receive any strong opioids for pain at least 2 weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal.
  • Local infection at the puncture site.
  • Coagulopathy.
  • Cognitive disorders.
  • Unstable cardiovascular disease.
  • History of psychiatric disorders.
  • History of drug abuse.
  • Patients allergic to medication used.
  • Patients with any contraindications to drugs and dye used.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Fluoroscopy-guided superior hypogastric plexus block transdiscal approach
fluroscopy guided superior hypogastric plexus block transdiscal approach for chronic pain treatment in cancer bladder VAS score and morphine consumption are measured before and after 1 day , 1 month , 3 monthes
Patient lies prone, L5-S1 interspace identified under fluoroscopy, the skin is prepared and sterile drapes are placed after local anesthetic infiltration of the skin the subcutaneous tissue with 2% lidocaine a 20 guage, 15 cm needle with short bevel is inserted at the center of L5- S1 interlaminar space under anteroposterior fluoroscopic vision. The needle is then advanced toward the intervertebral disc. After confirmation, the needle is advanced through the intervertebral disc until it exists at its anterior surface confirmed by administration of 4 ml of soluble contrast media in both lateral and anteroposterior fluoroscopic view. Neurolysis is performed with 8 ml 8 % phenol solution. After neurolysis, 0.5 ml of saline is given to avoid the deposition of phenol within the intervertebral disc material. While withdrawing, the needle cephazoline 50 mg in 1 ml is injected into the disc.
Other Names:
  • fluroscopy
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: ultrasound-guided superior hypogastric plexus block
ultrasound guided superior hypogastric plexus block in treatment of chronic pain in cancer badder VAS score and morphine consumption are measured before and after 1 day , 1 month , 3 monthes
Patients are placed in the supine position and after sterilization, the low-frequency curved probe is used in the longitudinal axis to visualize the aortic bifurcation and is identified using a longitudinal Ultra-Sound (Phillips Healthcare, Andover, Massachusetts, US). Next, the probe is placed deeply transverse till aorta end and bifurcation seen of iliac vessels once seen we enter out of plane and inject.as it lies in front the vertebral body of the L5 vertebra. Local infiltration with 1% lidocaine is obtained at port of entry 1-1.5 inches below the umbilicus. A 15-cm, 22-G Chiba needle is inserted (out-of-plane) and advanced by avoiding vascular structures until contact with the L5-body. The needle will be withdrawan the 1-2 mm and inject 8 ml 8% phenol in saline. Finally, 0.5 ml of lidocaine is injected during Chiba needle removal
Other Names:
  • ultrasound

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analogue scale (VAS) score
Time Frame: Three months after the procedure

Pain Intensity measured by Visual analogue scale score16 (A 100 mm horizontal line version is used with 2 ends left end means no pain and right end means the worst pain.

VAS will be recorded before and after the procedure, at the first day, after 1 month and after 3 months.

Three months after the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The amount of daily morphine consumption
Time Frame: Three months after the procedure

Daily morphine or other drugs consumption according to WHO ladder after the procedure.

This will be recorded before and after the procedure, at the first day, after 1 month and after 3 months.

Three months after the procedure
Patient functional capacity
Time Frame: Three months after the procedure

Patient functional capacity (is evaluated using Eastern cooperative oncology group "ECOG" scoring (0=fully active, 1= able to perform light effort, 2= in bed <50% of the day 3=in bed >50% of the day, 4=bed ridden).

This will be recorded before and after the procedure, at the first day, after 1 month and after 3 months.

Three months after the procedure
Quality of life
Time Frame: Three months after the procedure

Patient quality of life SF-36 19 (consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.

This will be recorded before and after the procedure, at the first day, after 1 month and after 3 months.

Three months after the procedure
Complications
Time Frame: Three months after the procedure
Any complications will be detected: back pain, bleeding, infection, L5 root injury with paresthesia or motor weakness, and visceral or vascular injuries.
Three months after the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Khaled Mostafa, National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 30, 2021

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

October 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 19, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AP2103-30101R

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Chronic

Clinical Trials on Fluoroscopy-guided superior hypogastric plexus block transdiscal approach

3
Subscribe