Palliative Care Planner (PCplanner)
The Palliative Care Planner (PCplanner) for Outpatients Pilot Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Jessie Gu, MD
- Phone Number: 919-681-7232
- Email: jessie.gu@duke.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Allie Frear
- Phone Number: 919-684-8914
- Email: allie.frear@duke.edu
Study Locations
-
-
North Carolina
-
Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
- Duke University Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient has diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
- Patient has GAP (gender, age, physiology) index score ≥ 4
- Patient is established in interstitial lung disease clinic (i.e., has had at least 1 previous clinic visit)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient lacks fluency in English sufficient to complete study surveys
- Patient is already seeing palliative care or enrolled in hospice
- NEST score <10 at baseline T1
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: PCplanner mobile app platform
Participants who are randomized to the intervention arm will complete surveys at 3 timepoints and will be given resources on advance care planning via PCplanner, the mobile app platform.
They will receive a telephone call by the study team about a week after enrollment to answer any questions about the resources provided.
If needs and questions are not resolved quickly after the clinic visit, then another layer of patient support with a telephone call by a palliative care specialist will be provided to the participant to help develop potential management plans.
|
A mobile app platform that will display participant survey results to clinicians to facilitate communication on specific needs as well as provide resources on advance care planning to participants.
|
|
No Intervention: Usual Care
Participants who are randomized to the usual care arm will complete surveys at 3 timepoints and receive usual care by pulmonary clinician.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility of intervention
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
|
Number of participants who stated intervention was easy to use as measured by patient survey.
|
Up to 16 weeks
|
|
Acceptability of intervention
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
|
Number of participants who stated they were satisfied with the intervention as measured by patient survey.
|
Up to 16 weeks
|
|
Completion of intervention
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
|
Number of participants who completed all three surveys and intervention telephone visits.
|
Up to 16 weeks
|
|
Change in Needs; Existential concerns; Symptoms; and Therapeutic interaction (NEST) scale
Time Frame: Baseline to week 8
|
Scale ranges from 0 to 130 with lower score indicates less unmet needs and higher score indicates more unmet needs on issues such as communication, symptoms, social support, and financial stress.
|
Baseline to week 8
|
|
Documentation of advance care planning in electronic health record
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
|
Includes all or any of the following: code status, healthcare power of attorney, advance directive
|
Up to 16 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Needs; Existential concerns; Symptoms; and Therapeutic interaction (NEST) scale
Time Frame: Baseline to week 16
|
Scale ranges from 0 to 130 with lower score indicates less unmet needs and higher score indicates more unmet needs on issues such as communication, symptoms, social support, and financial stress.
|
Baseline to week 16
|
|
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score
Time Frame: Baseline to week 8
|
Score ranges from 0 to 27 with lower score indicates no or mild depression and higher score indicates more severe depression.
|
Baseline to week 8
|
|
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score
Time Frame: Baseline to week 16
|
Score ranges from 0 to 27 with lower score indicates no or mild depression and higher score indicates more severe depression.
|
Baseline to week 16
|
|
Change in General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) score
Time Frame: Baseline to week 8
|
Score ranges from 0 to 21 with lower score indicates no or mild anxiety and higher score indicates more severe generalized anxiety.
|
Baseline to week 8
|
|
Change in General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) score
Time Frame: Baseline to week 16
|
Score ranges from 0 to 21 with lower score indicates no or mild anxiety and higher score indicates more severe generalized anxiety.
|
Baseline to week 16
|
|
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-10 (PHQ-10) score
Time Frame: Baseline to week 8
|
Scores range from 0 to 20 with lower score indicates less bothersome symptoms and higher score indicates more bothersome symptoms.
|
Baseline to week 8
|
|
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-10 (PHQ-10) score
Time Frame: Baseline to week 16
|
Scores range from 0 to 20 with lower score indicates less bothersome symptoms and higher score indicates more bothersome symptoms.
|
Baseline to week 16
|
|
Change in EuroQol - 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) score
Time Frame: Baseline to week 8
|
Scores generally range from 0 (poor quality of life) to 1 (best quality of life possible)
|
Baseline to week 8
|
|
Change in EuroQol - 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) score
Time Frame: Baseline to week 16
|
Scores generally range from 0 (poor quality of life) to 1 (best quality of life possible)
|
Baseline to week 16
|
|
Change in Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (QOL VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline to week 8
|
Scores range from 0 to 100 with lower score indicates worse imaginable quality of life and higher score indicates better imaginable quality of life.
|
Baseline to week 8
|
|
Change in Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (QOL VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline to week 16
|
Scores range from 0 to 100 with lower score indicates worse imaginable quality of life and higher score indicates better imaginable quality of life.
|
Baseline to week 16
|
|
Change in Therapeutic Alliance score
Time Frame: Baseline to week 8
|
Score ranges from 16 to 64 with lower score indicates lower perceived alliance between patient and their provider and higher score indicates better therapeutic alliance.
|
Baseline to week 8
|
|
Change in Therapeutic Alliance score
Time Frame: Baseline to week 16
|
Score ranges from 16 to 64 with lower score indicates lower perceived alliance between patient and their provider and higher score indicates better therapeutic alliance.
|
Baseline to week 16
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of hospitalizations during study
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
|
Admission to a hospital abstracted from electronic health record
|
Up to 16 weeks
|
|
Referral to palliative care specialist during study
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
|
Referral to palliative care specialist during study abstracted from electronic health record
|
Up to 16 weeks
|
|
Referral to hospice during study
Time Frame: Up to 16 weeks
|
Referral to inpatient or home hospice during study abstracted from electronic health record
|
Up to 16 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Christopher Cox, MD, Duke Health
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Rabow MW, Dibble SL, Pantilat SZ, McPhee SJ. The comprehensive care team: a controlled trial of outpatient palliative medicine consultation. Arch Intern Med. 2004 Jan 12;164(1):83-91. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.1.83.
- Higginson IJ, Bausewein C, Reilly CC, Gao W, Gysels M, Dzingina M, McCrone P, Booth S, Jolley CJ, Moxham J. An integrated palliative and respiratory care service for patients with advanced disease and refractory breathlessness: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2014 Dec;2(12):979-87. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70226-7. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
- Olson A, Hartmann N, Patnaik P, Wallace L, Schlenker-Herceg R, Nasser M, Richeldi L, Hoffmann-Vold AM, Cottin V. Estimation of the Prevalence of Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases: Systematic Literature Review and Data from a Physician Survey. Adv Ther. 2021 Feb;38(2):854-867. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01578-6. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
- Moens K, Higginson IJ, Harding R; EURO IMPACT. Are there differences in the prevalence of palliative care-related problems in people living with advanced cancer and eight non-cancer conditions? A systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Oct;48(4):660-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.11.009. Epub 2014 May 5.
- Gore JM, Brophy CJ, Greenstone MA. How well do we care for patients with end stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)? A comparison of palliative care and quality of life in COPD and lung cancer. Thorax. 2000 Dec;55(12):1000-6. doi: 10.1136/thorax.55.12.1000.
- Au DH, Udris EM, Fihn SD, McDonell MB, Curtis JR. Differences in health care utilization at the end of life among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and patients with lung cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Feb 13;166(3):326-31. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.3.326.
- Bausewein C, Booth S, Gysels M, Kuhnbach R, Haberland B, Higginson IJ. Understanding breathlessness: cross-sectional comparison of symptom burden and palliative care needs in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cancer. J Palliat Med. 2010 Sep;13(9):1109-18. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0068.
- Bajwah S, Higginson IJ, Ross JR, Wells AU, Birring SS, Patel A, Riley J. Specialist palliative care is more than drugs: a retrospective study of ILD patients. Lung. 2012 Apr;190(2):215-20. doi: 10.1007/s00408-011-9355-7. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
- Ley B, Ryerson CJ, Vittinghoff E, Ryu JH, Tomassetti S, Lee JS, Poletti V, Buccioli M, Elicker BM, Jones KD, King TE Jr, Collard HR. A multidimensional index and staging system for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 15;156(10):684-91. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-10-201205150-00004.
- Ryerson CJ, Vittinghoff E, Ley B, Lee JS, Mooney JJ, Jones KD, Elicker BM, Wolters PJ, Koth LL, King TE Jr, Collard HR. Predicting survival across chronic interstitial lung disease: the ILD-GAP model. Chest. 2014 Apr;145(4):723-728. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-1474.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Pro00108264
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.