Monitoring the Effects of Probiotic Supplementation in Immunocompromised Kidney Transplanted Subjects

October 19, 2021 updated by: State University of New York - Upstate Medical University
In order to protect their new renal graft, post-transplant patients follow a rigorous immunosuppressive therapy combined with prophylactic antibiotic treatment. Kidney transplant recipients are prescribed long-term immunosuppression maintenance regimens that are the prophylaxis of organ rejection. The most frequently used are calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus or cyclosporine) combined with glucocorticoids (methylprednisolone, prednisone) and antiproliferative agents (mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine). However, the use of immunosuppressive medication in transplanted patients have well-documented limitations. Recent studies reported major changes in microbiota composition as a result of immunosuppression use. A large majority of transplant patients develops severe GI problems, with the most common complication being post-transplant diarrhea. Several studies have assessed and confirmed negative effects of post-transplant diarrhea. According to (3, 4), post-transplant diarrhea affects 1 in 5 patients in the first year after kidney transplantation and is associated with decreased quality of life, allograft failure, and even death.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Challenges faced by patients after kidney transplantation prompted providers to look for additional strategies to improve their quality of life and decrease graft risks. In daily practice, investigators noted that a good percentage of transplant patients develops gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, particularly diarrhea. In literature, this is known as Immunosuppression Acquired Diarrhea (IAD). These episodes are especially distressing and usually lead to immunosuppressive medication being reduced in dose or stopped. As a result of these actions, transplant patients become exposed to rejection, graft loss, and even death. Considering how the microbiota is altered during the post-transplant medication regimen, restoring the gut balance through the administration of probiotics presents a suitable solution. The proposed research would help increase knowledge on the beneficial effects and safety of probiotics in post-transplant patients.

Diarrhea is a very common and severe complication in post-transplant patients. In the majority of the cases, it is categorized as unspecified noninfectious diarrhea (1, 3). Transplant physicians associate it with immunosuppressive drugs such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (7) and other agents such as tacrolimus, azathioprine, and adrenal corticosteroids that are the prophylaxis of organ rejection in patients receiving allogenic renal transplants.

The most common strategy to reduce post-transplant noninfectious diarrhea is the reduction of MMF dosing (4). Many times, the diarrhea events are so severe that the recipient's immunosuppressive medications are tapered, changed or stopped. As a result, patients become at risk of early acute rejection and graft loss.

There is a large body of literature that offers information about the etiology of diarrhea for these patients. The main cause is an alteration in microbiota composition - a condition known as dysbiosis. Offering great insight, Swarat et al., (8) wrote, "the microbiota is able to induce disease (10, 12) and also able to regulate immunity or tolerance. An imbalance between pathogenic and protective microbes characterizes dysbiosis, a perturbation in the normal composition of commensal microbiota". In the post-transplant patient population, the immunosuppressive regimen and use of prophylactic antimicrobial treatments create new post-transplant microbiota communities. In literature, dysbiosis is associated with clinical conditions and systematic inflammation.

Four main phyla found in the GI tract are known to contribute to human health and disease: Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria, with the majority of species being non-pathogenic [13]. These commensal microbes play an important role in immune regulation, nutrition, and maintenance of host barriers against pathogens [14, 15]. It was reported that during diarrhea episodes (dysbiosis) in post-transplant patients, there is an increase in Proteobacteria and a decrease in Bacteroides, Ruminococcus, Coprococcus, and Dorea.

Although there are clinical trials offering information about microbiota composition in patients with diarrhea, there is not much information that links it to probiotic use after kidney transplantation.

The main objectives of this clinical trial are:

  1. To investigate if daily use of low dose probiotics is effective in alleviating symptoms of diarrhea as well as lowering pro-inflammatory and inflammatory biomarkers and increasing anti-inflammatory biomarkers in renal transplant recipients.
  2. To characterize microbiota in subjects with and without diarrhea and determine if there is any correlation between microbiota content and pro-inflammatory, inflammatory, and anti-inflammatory biomarkers.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • Syracuse, New York, United States, 13210
        • Suny Upstate Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Recipient of a living or deceased donor kidney transplant
  • Maintenance of a therapeutic dose of Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) and Tacrolimus after transplant
  • No other gastrointestinal issues

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently pregnant and lactating
  • Has been receiving probiotics supplementation other than the study designated formula
  • Participation in a different clinical trial
  • Positive infection of Clostridium difficile and/or rotavirus as analyzed by stool culture

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Subjects randomized in the Placebo Arm will take one placebo capsule daily. Each capsule will also contain 32 mg of riboflavin as a tracer substance for tracking compliance.
Dietary supplement: Placebo Supplementation
Subjects will take Florajen Digestion starting from Week 3 post-transplant until 180 days after transplant. Compliance will be measured through the return of empty packs and urinalysis for riboflavin during follow-up visits in clinic.
Active Comparator: Treatment
Subjects randomized in the Treatment Arm will take one placebo capsule daily. One Florajen Digestion capsule contains 15 billion live cultures of Lactobacillus acidophilus (7.5 billion), Bifodobacterium lactis (6.0 billion), and Bifidobacterium longum (1.5 billion). Each capsule will also contain 32 mg of riboflavin as a tracer substance for tracking compliance.
Dietary supplement: Florajen Digestion Supplementation
Subjects will take the placebo starting from Week 3 post-transplant until 180 days after transplant. Compliance will be measured through the return of empty packs and urinalysis for riboflavin during follow-up visits in clinic.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To investigate if daily use of low dose probiotics is effective in alleviating symptoms of diarrhea in post-transplant subjects
Time Frame: 180 days
Does a small dose of daily probiotic supplementation improve the quality of life for kidney transplanted patients? Reduction and correction of diarrhea will be measured by <3 well-formed daily bowel movements, <200 grams of daily stool, and <75-85% fecal water content.
180 days
Correlation of probiotic use with pro-inflammatory, inflammatory, and anti-inflammatory biomarkers
Time Frame: 180 days

Does probiotic supplementation lower pro-inflammatory and inflammatory biomarkers while increasing anti-inflammatory biomarkers in renal transplant recipients?

Pro-inflammatory cytokines: Interleukin (IL)-1, IL-12, IL-13, IL-17A, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interferon (INF)-γ Inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines: IL-6 and IL-4, and IL-10, respectively. Reduction and increments will be measured by the lowering or increasing of serum cytokine by 20% from baseline
180 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To characterize microbiota in subjects with and without diarrhea
Time Frame: 180 days
Positive correlations will exist between "good" fecal microbiota content shifts and reductions in serum pro-inflammatory cytokine values. "Good" fecal microbiota shifts are defined as increases in Firmicutes, Bacteroides, Ruminococcus, Coprococcus, and Dorea and decreases in Protobacteria.
180 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
State University of New York - Upstate Medical University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mark R Laftavi, MD, State University of New York - Upstate Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 19, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 19, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 19, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1424802

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dysbiosis

Clinical Trials on Placebo Supplementation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings