Efficacy of Azithromycin in MSAF Cases to Improve Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes

November 5, 2021 updated by: Ahmed Mohamed Kamal Zaghloul, Cairo University

Comparison Between Azithromycin vs Placebo in Cases of Meconium Stained Amniotic Fluid During the First Stage of Labor in Multigravida Women and Their Effect on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes, a Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Randomized Clinical Trial.

Meconium stained amniotic fluid increases the risk of maternal complications (e.g., dystocia, operative delivery, and postpartum endometritis) and neonatal complications (e.g., sepsis, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit [NICU], and meconium aspiration syndrome). The goal of the study is to compare between Azithromycin vs Placebo in cases of meconium stained amniotic fluid during the first stage of labor in multigravida women and their effect on maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Meconium stained amniotic fluid, a troublesome situation both for obstetrician and pediatrician, it is associated with high rates of caesarean section, perinatal morbidity and mortality. The rate of meconium-stained amniotic fluid varies from 12 to 20%.It is higher in underdeveloped countries.Our study design would be a prospective randomized trial. Consented, eligible pregnant women presenting during the first stage of labor at or more than 37 weeks of gestation with meconium stained amniotic fluid will be randomized to receive Azithromycin capsule (Zithromax, Pfizer) (250 mg / 12hrs on empty stomach for 3 days)(Group 1).Group 2 will be offered placebo capsules (manufactured in pharmacy department with the same shape, color and consistency as Azithromycin capsule for 3 days).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
324

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Cairo, Egypt, 002
        • Cairo University
      • Giza, Egypt, 002
        • Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Multigravida pregnant women with meconium stained amniotic fluid encountered either by spontaneous/artificial amniotomy during the first stage of labor in the ward provided that the gestational age at delivery is 37 weeks of gestation or more.
  2. Singleton living gestation
  3. Cephalic presentation
  4. Adequate pelvis
  5. An informed written consent for the proposed study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Primigravids
  2. Women with previous cesarean section
  3. Multifetal gestation
  4. Intrauterine fetal death
  5. Malpresentations
  6. Prematurity (<37 weeks )
  7. Abnormally invasive placenta during the current pregnancy
  8. Medical disorders with pregnancy
  9. Contracted pelvis
  10. Evidence of maternal infection
  11. Allergy to azithromycin or other macrolides that is self-reported or documented in the medical record.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Azithromycin group
Azithromycin capsule (Zithromax, Pfizer) (250 mg / 12 hrs on empty stomach for 3 days).
Drug: Azithromycin capsule (Zithromax, Pfizer) (250 mg)
Azithromycin, a second generation macrolide, broad-spectrum antibacterial that stops bacterial growth by inhibiting protein synthesis and translation, treating bacterial infections Azithromycin has additional immunomodulatory effects and has been used in chronic respiratory inflammatory diseases for this purpose. .Azithromycin has been beneficial in the treatment of influenza and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and recently has shown to be effective against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV-2) when used in combination with hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo group
placebo capsules (manufactured in pharmacy department with the same shape, color and consistency as Azithromycin capsule every 12hrs for 3 days). A single pharmacist will be responsible for manufacturing of placebo capsules and packing all medications into sterile boxes and labelling of them as 1 or 2.
Drug: Placebo
A treatment that has no active properties

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Azithromycin vs Placebo in cases of meconium stained amniotic fluid during the first stage of labor in multigravida women and their effect on occurrence of maternal fever, postpartum endometritis and skin (episiotomy/tear) infection.
Time Frame: within 1 week from delivery
Mothers will be followed up during her stay in the postnatal ward regarding signs of infection (fever, maternal tachycardia, offensive vaginal discharge, uterine tenderness). Postpartum follow up visit 1 week after delivery will be conducted.
within 1 week from delivery
Azithromycin vs Placebo in cases of meconium stained amniotic fluid during the first stage of labor in multigravida women and their effect on occurrence of neonatal fever , pneumonia and skin infection .
Time Frame: within 1 week from delivery
Neonates were followed up for incidence of neonatal pneumonia, neonatal skin infection , neonatal fever.
within 1 week from delivery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fetal necessity for NICU admission and/or mechanical ventilation.
Time Frame: after delivery and within 1 week postartum
Incidence of NICU admission and/or mechanical ventilation in neonates born to women with MSAF
after delivery and within 1 week postartum
Occurrence of meconium aspiration
Time Frame: after delivery and within 1 week postpartum
Neonates will be followed up for presence or absence of meconium aspiration, APGAR score at 1 and 5 minutes, RDS.
after delivery and within 1 week postpartum
2- Side effects of drug (diarrhea, stomach cramps, vomiting, allergy and anaphylactic shock).
Time Frame: wwithin 1 week postpartum
Mothers follow up for incidence of side effects related to Azithromycin
wwithin 1 week postpartum

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cairo University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Gamal GamalEldin Youssef, PHD, Cairo University
  • Study Director: Eman Aly Hussein Aly, PHD, Cairo University
  • Study Director: Ahmed Samir Rashwan, PHD, Cairo University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 16, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 4, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 5, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 5, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 5, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Azithromycin in MSAF cases

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings