Can Overall Adenoma Detection Rate Replace Screening Adenoma Detection Rate ? Multicenter Study

September 8, 2026 updated by: Evergreen General Hospital, Taiwan

Improving Colonoscopy Adenoma Detection Metrics by Extending the Screening-only Measurement to All Indications: a Prospective Multicenter Study

This is a prospective equivalence colonoscopy study evaluating whether overall adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a reliable alternate for screening ADR. Overall indication includes screening, surveillance, and diagnostic indications.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This multicenter study will be conducted by 18 colonoscopists from 5 hospitals in Taiwan, including Evergreen general hospital, E-da hospital, E-da Dachang hospital, Linkou Chang Gung memorial hospital, and Keelung Chang Gung memorial hospital, and plans to recruit 2700 prospective participants in a 2-year period. Felix W. Leung from Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (USA) will be involved in the study design, and will participate in data analyses and report preparation. Consecutive patients aged ≥50 years undergoing colonoscopy are eligible for enrollment. Positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT+) is considered as an independent indication category and the colonoscopy indications are categorized into 4 groups: screening, surveillance, diagnostic, and FIT+. Overall indication will be subdivided into overall excluding FIT (overall-non-FIT) group and overall including FIT (overall-FIT) group. In this study, the investigators plan to (1) compare individual ADR across 4 colonoscopy indication categories (screening, surveillance, diagnostic, FIT+); (2) explore correlations between screening ADR and overall-non-FIT and overall-FIT ADRs, respectively.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
2707

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Taiwan
      • Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, 82445
        • E-Da Hospital
      • Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, 80784
        • E-Da Dachang Hospital
      • Keelung, Taiwan, 204
        • Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
      • Taoyuan, Taiwan, 320
        • Evergreen General Hospital
      • Taoyuan, Taiwan, 333
        • Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
  • United States
    • California
      • North Hills, California, United States, 91343
        • Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center, VAGLAHS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients aged ≥50 years undergoing screening, surveillance, diagnostic, and FIT+ colonoscopy are eligible for enrollment in this study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • consecutive patients aged ≥50 years undergoing colonoscopy are eligible for enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • high risk family history of colorectal cancer (CRC) e.g., familial adenomatous polyposis, hereditary non-polyposis CRC syndrome, multiple first degree relatives with CRC, or a single first degree relative with CRC at <60 years
  • serrated polyposis syndrome
  • inflammatory bowel disease
  • colonoscopy to remove a large neoplastic polyps
  • obstructive lesions of the colon
  • gastrointestinal bleeding
  • current participation in other studies
  • hospitalized patients
  • mental retardation
  • pregnancy
  • refusal to provide a written informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Screening indication
Screening indication includes asymptomatic patients aged ≥50 years with no prior colonoscopy and at average risk of CRC. Screening indication also includes asymptomatic patients with negative prior colonoscopy.
Other: Comparison of ADR
The investigators will compare ADRs using traditional screening-restricted definition and combined screening, surveillance, and diagnostic indication (i.e., overall-non-FIT indication). The impact of addition of FIT+ indication into the overall indication (i.e., overall-FIT indication) on ADR will also be evaluated.
Surveillance indication
Surveillance indication includes patients with prior colon neoplasms, including conventional adenomas and clinically significant serrated polyps.
Other: Comparison of ADR
The investigators will compare ADRs using traditional screening-restricted definition and combined screening, surveillance, and diagnostic indication (i.e., overall-non-FIT indication). The impact of addition of FIT+ indication into the overall indication (i.e., overall-FIT indication) on ADR will also be evaluated.
Diagnostic indication
Diagnostic indication includes patients who report symptoms (e.g., abdominal pain, a change in bowel habits, or rectal bleeding) before their first screening examination and undergo evaluation of an abnormality on other image study, unexplained anemia and/or unexplained weight loss.
Other: Comparison of ADR
The investigators will compare ADRs using traditional screening-restricted definition and combined screening, surveillance, and diagnostic indication (i.e., overall-non-FIT indication). The impact of addition of FIT+ indication into the overall indication (i.e., overall-FIT indication) on ADR will also be evaluated.
Positive fecal immunochemical test
FIT+ indication includes patients who undergo colonoscopy for positive FIT results in screen-eligible individuals. FIT+ indication also applies to those with a positive FIT result and a recent colonoscopy.
Other: Comparison of ADR
The investigators will compare ADRs using traditional screening-restricted definition and combined screening, surveillance, and diagnostic indication (i.e., overall-non-FIT indication). The impact of addition of FIT+ indication into the overall indication (i.e., overall-FIT indication) on ADR will also be evaluated.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adenoma detection rate
Time Frame: 7 days
The proportion of participants undergoing a complete colonoscopy who have one or more adenomas detected
7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Evergreen General Hospital, Taiwan

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
E-DA Hospital
E-Da Dachang Hospital
Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Chi-Liang Cheng, Evergreen General Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 20, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 31, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 7, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 7, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 18, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 8, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • EGH-2022-1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings