Sensitivity of Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) for Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening (FITBACK)

December 6, 2021 updated by: University Hospital, Brest

Sensitivity of Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) for Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening and Interval Cancer Risk : a Population Based Study

Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) was introduced in France late 2015, FIT has better diagnostic accuracy for colorectal cancers (CRCs) than previous screening tests. Our primary objective was to evaluate the sensitivity of FIT and the proportion of interval cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) aims to detect pre-symptomatic lesions, i.e., early stage colorectal cancers (CRCs) or pre-cancerous lesions such as colonic adenomas in order to reduce CRC mortality. FIT was introduced in France late 2015, FIT has better diagnostic accuracy for CRCs than previous screening tests. Determining the incidence of post-test interval CRCs, diagnosed after a negative FIT and before the recommended date of the next test (2-year interval), allows assessment of the sensitivity of the test. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of FIT during the CRC screening campaign in the Finistère department (France) from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017. Its secondary objectives were the evaluation of diagnostic circumstances and their impact on treatment and survival, and risk factors for interval cancer (IC).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1149

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Brest, France, 29200
        • University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

46 years to 73 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This retrospective study evaluated the CRC screening campaign, which took place from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017 in the Finistère department.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All subjects between 50 and 77 years diagnosed with an in situ or an invasive CRC
  • Inhabitants of the Finistère area

  • Subjects were included by period:

    • from January 2016 to December 2017 for subjects with SD-CRC, non-responders and the excluded population
    • from January 2016 to December 2019 for subjects with FIT-ICs (2-year interval)
    • from January 2016 to December 2020 for subjects with post-colonoscopy IC
    • from January 2018 to December 2020 for subjects with delayed diagnosis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who refused to participate in the case of refusal of data collection
  • Subject swith CRC other than adenocarcinoma were excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
CRC in excluded population
CRC diagnosed in the population excluded from screening
Diagnostic test: Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) not performed
We evaluated CRCs screening campaign from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017, and interval cancers within two years after a negative test, and five years for post-colonoscopy interval cancers.
Screen-detected colorectal cancers (SD-CRCs)
CRC diagnosed after a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT)
Diagnostic test: Positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT)
We evaluated CRCs screening campaign from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017, and interval cancers within two years after a negative test, and five years for post-colonoscopy interval cancers.
Colorectal cancers (CRCs) with delayed diagnosis
CRCs diagnosed after a positive fecal immunochemical (FIT) test, but without colonoscopy or > 2 years after a positive fecal immunochemical test
Diagnostic test: Positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT)
We evaluated CRCs screening campaign from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017, and interval cancers within two years after a negative test, and five years for post-colonoscopy interval cancers.
Fecal immunochemical test interval colorectal cancers (FIT IC)
CRCs diagnosed 2 years after a negative FIT
Diagnostic test: Negative fecal immunochemical test (FIT)
We evaluated CRCs screening campaign from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017, and interval cancers within two years after a negative test, and five years for post-colonoscopy interval cancers.
colorectal cancers (CRCs) in non-responders
CRCs diagnosed in the FIT non-responders population
Diagnostic test: Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) not performed
We evaluated CRCs screening campaign from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017, and interval cancers within two years after a negative test, and five years for post-colonoscopy interval cancers.
Post-colonoscopy interval cancers
CRCs diagnosed within 5 years after a colonoscopy performed following a positive test that did not find colorectal cancer
Diagnostic test: Positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT)
We evaluated CRCs screening campaign from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017, and interval cancers within two years after a negative test, and five years for post-colonoscopy interval cancers.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
sensitivity of the fecal immunochemical test for the detection of colorectal cancers
Time Frame: We evaluated CRCs screening campaign from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017, and interval cancers within two years after a negative test, and five years for post-colonoscopy interval cancers.
Sensitivity = True positive / True positive + False negative = SD CRCs / SD CRCs + FIT IC
We evaluated CRCs screening campaign from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017, and interval cancers within two years after a negative test, and five years for post-colonoscopy interval cancers.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Parameters affecting the sensitivity of FIT, risk factors of interval cancer
Time Frame: We evaluated CRCs screening campaign from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017, and interval cancers within two years after a negative test, and five years for post-colonoscopy interval cancers.
Age, sex, stages, localizations, comparison by Chi2 or Fisher's test for categorical data and Student's test for quantitative data. Multivariate analysis using logistic regression.
We evaluated CRCs screening campaign from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017, and interval cancers within two years after a negative test, and five years for post-colonoscopy interval cancers.
FIT value
Time Frame: FIT data included its value, comprised between 10 and 200 µg haemoglobin/g faeces (analytical limits of quantification),
FIT value, comprised between 10 and 200 µg haemoglobin/g faeces (analytical limits of quantification),
FIT data included its value, comprised between 10 and 200 µg haemoglobin/g faeces (analytical limits of quantification),
Survival
Time Frame: We evaluated CRCs screening campaign from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017, and interval cancers within two years after a negative test, and five years for post-colonoscopy interval cancers.
Analysis of survival according to diagnostic circumstances
We evaluated CRCs screening campaign from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017, and interval cancers within two years after a negative test, and five years for post-colonoscopy interval cancers.
Treatment
Time Frame: We evaluated CRCs screening campaign from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017, and interval cancers within two years after a negative test, and five years for post-colonoscopy interval cancers.
Analysis of treatment according to diagnostic circumstances
We evaluated CRCs screening campaign from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017, and interval cancers within two years after a negative test, and five years for post-colonoscopy interval cancers.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Brest

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Registre des Tumeurs Digestives du Finistère
Centre Régional de Coordination des Dépistages des Cancers Bretagne (CRCDC Bretagne)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Michel ROBASZKIEWICZ, University Hospital, Brest

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 20, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 11, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 11, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 18, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 6, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 20, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 6, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • FITBACK ( 29BRC21.0147)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings