Effect of Theta-Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TBS) for Freezing of Gait
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This was a open-label clinical trial to assess the efficacy and underlying neural mechanism of TBS among patients with FOG. Forty patients with FOG were treated with TBS for 1 week.
Before the TBS treatment, the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire, the Timed up and go test, the Standing Start 180° Turning Test, the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, and the Non-motor Symptom Scale, the Pittsburgh sleep quality index were obtained by a trained investigator to assess baseline severity. The patients had receiving a battery measure of neuropsychological tests(mini-mental state examination, Montreal cognitive assessment, digital span test, verbal fluency test, Hamilton depression/anxiety scale) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan in multimodalities, electroencephalography (EEG) record and fNIRS.
In the second day after the last treatment, all the tests, MRI 、EEG and fNIRS were reassessed. Patients were instructed to focus their answers on the past 1 week.
The clinical symptom and cognition of participants were followed in one month and two month after the last treatment.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Gong-Jun JI, Ph.D.
- Phone Number: +8655162923704
- Email: jigongjun@163.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Jinmei Sun, M.S.
- Phone Number: +8615856381782
- Email: sunjinmei0628@163.com
Study Locations
-
-
Anhui
-
Hefei, Anhui, China, 230032
- Recruiting
- Cognitive Neuropsychology Lab Anhui Medical University
-
Contact:
- Gong-Jun JI, Ph.D.
- Phone Number: +8655162923704
- Email: jigongjun@163.com
-
Contact:
- Jinmei Sun, M.S.
- Phone Number: +8615856381782
- Email: sunjinmei0628@163.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- diagnosis of FOG with expertise in movement disorders.
- the score of item 3 of the FOG questionnaire ≥1.
- ongoing treatment with a stable dose of any medication for 2 months.
- 40 years of age or older.
Exclusion Criteria:
- a history of addiction, psychiatric disorders, or neurological diseases other than PD.
- focal brain lesions on T1-/T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images.
- anti-PD medication adjustments during rTMS treatment.
- history of substance abuse within the past 6 months.
- nonremovable metal objects in or around the head.
- previously received rTMS treatment.
- prior history of seizure or history in first-degree relatives.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: TBS Group
Participants will receive active transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) daily for 1 week
|
The stimulations were performed by MagStim Rapid2.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Standing-Start 180° Turn Test (SS-180)
Time Frame: changes from baseline to 1-week post-treatment
|
The participants walk for a distance of five meters from a sitting position and come back to the chair after turning 180° around a traffic cone in a 0.7 m × 0.7 m target box.The time and number of steps during the 180° turn (SS180) are measured.
|
changes from baseline to 1-week post-treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III (UPDRSIII)
Time Frame: changes from baseline to 1-week post-treatment
|
This is an very common clinical motor estimating scale, 14 items and 108' in total.
Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
|
changes from baseline to 1-week post-treatment
|
|
HAMD (Hamilton Depression Scale)
Time Frame: changes from baseline to 1-week post-treatment
|
This scale was compiled by Hamilton in 1960, is the most common clinical to assess Depression Scale.
In this study, 17 versions were selected, and there were 17 questions.
The subjects were assessed for their depression in the past week.
Each question scored between 0 and 4 points.Higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms.
|
changes from baseline to 1-week post-treatment
|
|
HAMA (Hamilton Anxiety Scale)
Time Frame: changes from baseline to 1-week post-treatment
|
This scale was compiled by Hamilton in 1959.It was one of the most commonly used scales in psychiatric clinic, including 14 items.
It is often used in clinical diagnosis and degree classification of anxiety disorder.
The subjects were assessed for their anxiety in the past week.
Each question scored between 0 and 4 points.
The higher the score, the more symptoms of anxiety.
|
changes from baseline to 1-week post-treatment
|
|
The timed up and go test (TUG)
Time Frame: changes from baseline to 1-week post-treatment
|
The participants walk for a distance of five meters from a sitting position and come back to the chair after turning 180° around a traffic cone in a 0.7 m × 0.7 m target box .The time and number of steps during the whole course are measured.
|
changes from baseline to 1-week post-treatment
|
|
The Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOGQ)
Time Frame: changes from baseline to 1-week post-treatment
|
This is an very common clinical motor estimating scale for evaluating FOG symptoms with 6 items and 24' in total.
Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
|
changes from baseline to 1-week post-treatment
|
|
Non-motor symptoms questionnaire
Time Frame: changes from baseline to 1-week post-treatment
|
This is a very common clinical scale with nine domains (30 items).
Each item was scored on "severity" range from 1 to 3 and "frequency" range from 1 to 4. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
|
changes from baseline to 1-week post-treatment
|
|
Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI)
Time Frame: changes from baseline to 1-week post-treatment
|
This scale was developed by Dr. Buysse et al., a psychiatrist at the University of Pittsburgh in 1989.
The scale is suitable for the evaluation of sleep quality in patients with sleep disorders and mental disorders, as well as for the evaluation of sleep quality in general.Each question scored between 0 and 3 points.The higher the score, the worse sleep quality.
|
changes from baseline to 1-week post-treatment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- AHMU-TMS-FOG
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.