Buffered vs. Unbuffered Local Anesthesia in Mandibular Molars Diagnosed With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis
Buffered vs. Unbuffered Local Anesthesia in Mandibular Molars Diagnosed With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Controlled, Randomized Double-blind Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Kenneth Spolnik, DDS
- Phone Number: 317-274-7280
- Email: kspolnik@iu.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Peter Alena, DMD
- Phone Number: 317-274-5311
- Email: palena@iu.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
- Indiana University School of Dentistry Graduate Endodontics Dept.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria - In order to participate, subjects must:
- Be between the ages of 18 and 80 years old
- Have the ability and willingness to independently consent to treatment and study participation
- Have an uncomplicated medical history (ASA I and II)
- Not be pregnant
- Have no allergies local anesthetics/sulfites (confirmed or self-reported)
- Not be taking any medications that may affect the proper assessment of the anesthetic (no acetaminophen or short-acting NSAIDs such as ibuprofen within the previous 6 hours; no long-acting NSAIDs such as naproxen within the previous 16 hours)
- Not require nitrous oxide during treatment, and the injection area should appear healthy with no other pre-existing conditions or infections that may compromise an accurate collection of data
- Be experiencing signs of irreversible pulpitis (an exaggerated response to cold that lingers longer than 10 seconds) in a mandibular molar at the time of conducting the study
Exclusion Criteria - No subjects will have:
- A negative response to cold in the proposed treatment tooth
- A radiographic periradicular pathosis more advanced than a widened periodontal ligament or have an intraoral swelling
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Buffered 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine
Buffered local anesthetic (addition of sodium bicarbonate to make a 10% buffered solution)
|
Onpharma's Onset sodium bicarbonate buffer to be added to a standard cartridge of dental local anesthetic
Septodont's standard formulation of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine
|
|
Active Comparator: Unbuffered 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine
Standard local anesthetic
|
Septodont's standard formulation of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
VAS Scores as Measures of Profoundness of Pulpal Anesthesia
Time Frame: Up to 20 minutes post-drug administration
|
The mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, which ranges from a min of 1 to a max of 10.
In other words, inadequate anesthesia is considered to be a VAS score that is between 4 and 10 because that is not considered to be "comfortable and profound".
|
Up to 20 minutes post-drug administration
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Onset of Pulpal Anesthesia
Time Frame: Up to 20 minutes post-drug administration
|
Duration of time in minutes required to achieve pulpal anesthesia, defined as an electrical pulp test score of 80 (which is the maximum stimulation).
Any EPT score between 1-79 after 20 minutes post-anesthesia is considered a failure of pulpal anesthesia.
|
Up to 20 minutes post-drug administration
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Rosenberg PA, Amin KG, Zibari Y, Lin LM. Comparison of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine when used as a supplemental anesthetic. J Endod. 2007 Apr;33(4):403-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.11.019. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
- Goodis HE, Poon A, Hargreaves KM. Tissue pH and temperature regulate pulpal nociceptors. J Dent Res. 2006 Nov;85(11):1046-9. doi: 10.1177/154405910608501114.
- Christoph RA, Buchanan L, Begalla K, Schwartz S. Pain reduction in local anesthetic administration through pH buffering. Ann Emerg Med. 1988 Feb;17(2):117-20. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80293-2.
- Schellenberg J, Drum M, Reader A, Nusstein J, Fowler S, Beck M. Effect of Buffered 4% Lidocaine on the Success of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study. J Endod. 2015 Jun;41(6):791-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.02.022. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
- Saatchi M, Farhad AR, Shenasa N, Haghighi SK. Effect of Sodium Bicarbonate Buccal Infiltration on the Success of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Mandibular First Molars with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized Double-blind Study. J Endod. 2016 Oct;42(10):1458-61. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
- Fowler S, Reader A. Is a volume of 3.6 mL better than 1.8 mL for inferior alveolar nerve blocks in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis? J Endod. 2013 Aug;39(8):970-2. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 May 16.
- Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Meechan JG. A prospective randomized trial of different supplementary local anesthetic techniques after failure of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis in mandibular teeth. J Endod. 2012 Apr;38(4):421-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.006. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Stomatognathic Diseases
- Tooth Diseases
- Dental Pulp Diseases
- Pulpitis
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Adrenergic Agents
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Autonomic Agents
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Sensory System Agents
- Anesthetics
- Adrenergic alpha-Agonists
- Adrenergic Agonists
- Membrane Transport Modulators
- Anesthetics, Local
- Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers
- Sodium Channel Blockers
- Bronchodilator Agents
- Anti-Asthmatic Agents
- Respiratory System Agents
- Adrenergic beta-Agonists
- Sympathomimetics
- Vasoconstrictor Agents
- Mydriatics
- Lidocaine
- Epinephrine
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 11447
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.