The Effect of the TENA SmartCare Change Indicator on Care Efficiency and Skin Health in Long Term Care Facilities
A Post-market Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effect of the TENA SmartCare Change Indicator on Continence Care Efficiency and Skin Health in Long Term Care Facilities
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Fredrik Agholme, PhD
- Phone Number: +46730323634
- Email: fredrik.agholme@essity.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Arne Böhling, PhD
- Phone Number: +4915221425063
- Email: arne.bohling@essity.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject has urinary incontinence managed with incontinence products with tapes, belted or pull up incontinence product type (products for moderate to heavy incontinence).
- Subject is a permanent (intended length of stay four months or longer) resident of the nursing home.
- Subject is unable to consistently communicate toileting needs.
- Subject is unable to successfully toilet and change the pad without assistance.
- Subject is using or is willing to use TENA Slip (Stretch) TENA Flex (Belted) and TENA Pants (Underwear) absorbing products for the study.
- Subject has a waist size appropriate to the available sizes of incontinence products.
- Subject is willing and able to provide informed consent to participate or if unable to provide consent have a legal representative who is willing and able to provide informed consent on behalf of the subject.
- Subject is part of a continence care regimen, defined as "check and change", using any method.
- If applicable, subject is to be on a stable regimen of medications for urinary incontinence
- Subject is over 18 years of age.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject has frequent (daily) faecal incontinence in the pad or having severe problems with faecal incontinence as determined by the investigator.
- Subject has severe incontinence product related skin problems, as defined by the GLOBIAD categorization 2B (skin loss & infection).
- Subject has any type of indwelling or external urinary catheter(s).
- Subject is anuric.
- Subject is managed using another automated or digital health technology incontinence management device.
- Subject has responsive behaviors of sufficient severity, in the opinion of the care staff, to make participation impractical.
- Subject has any other condition that makes participation in the clinical investigation inappropriate, as judged by investigator.
- Subject has a life expectancy of fewer than 3 months or be receiving palliative or terminal care.
- Subject has participated in an investigational study of a drug, biologic, or device within 30 days prior to entering the clinical investigation or planned during the clinical investigation.
- Subject is dependent on either alcohol or recreational drugs.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Device
Clusters in this arm will start using the device and use it for 6 weeks.
|
The intervention is a medical device system that consists of a reusable electronic sensor and an application installed on one or more smart phones.
The device estimates the saturation level of an absorbing incontinence product used by a study subject.
The device is non-invasive and does not have any effect on the function of the absorbing incontinence product.
|
|
No Intervention: Control
Clusters in this arm will not receive the device it will continue with usual care with no changes.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Care Efficiency score
Time Frame: 10 weeks.
|
Care efficiency is the weighted sum of the pre-defined care events divided by the number of recorded diary days of the subject in question.
The last week of the 4 week baseline and last week of the 6 week intervention/control time period is to be compared.
Data is presented as average daily care efficiency score (min/day).
Data is collected daily via the study diary.
|
10 weeks.
|
|
Daily Skin Health score
Time Frame: 10 weeks.
|
Skin health score is based on skin health grades (from 0, no skin problems to 4, very seveer skin problems) that have been reported by the caregiver in the study diary.
The last week of the 4 week baseline and last week of the 6 week intervention/control time period is to be compared.
Data is presented as average daily skin health score.
|
10 weeks.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Skin health score
Time Frame: 10 weeks.
|
Measured by the skin health assessment tool at study completion visit and compared to the end of baseline visit.
|
10 weeks.
|
|
Quality of life and level of utility
Time Frame: 10 weeks.
|
Measured using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire at study completion visit and compared to the end of baseline visit.
|
10 weeks.
|
|
Quality of life according to the QoL-AD
Time Frame: 10 weeks.
|
Measured and scored at completion visit and compared to the end of baseline visit.
|
10 weeks.
|
|
Level of agitation and responsive behavior.
Time Frame: 10 weeks.
|
Measured via interRAI Aggressive Behavior Scale at study completion visit and compared to the end of baseline visit.
|
10 weeks.
|
|
Total absorption value
Time Frame: 10 weeks.
|
From the study diary the type, number and absorption value of the incontinence care product is retrieved.
This data is used to create a total absorption measure.
The last week of the 4 week baseline and last week of the 6 week intervention/control time period is to be compared.
|
10 weeks.
|
|
Caregiver work engagement
Time Frame: 10 weeks.
|
Using the UWES questionnaire the work engagement of caregivers are measured at a cluster's end-of-trial visit and compared to the end of baseline visit.
|
10 weeks.
|
|
Caregiver work conditions
Time Frame: 10 weeks.
|
Measured using the organizational headroom questionnaire at a cluster's end-of-trial visit and compared to the end of baseline visit.
|
10 weeks.
|
|
Qualitative data on implementation, uptake, opportunities and barriers to use.
Time Frame: 10 weeks.
|
Response to interviews with caregivers, coded by the investigator and collated into trends and themes.
Conducted after completion of study for subjects.
|
10 weeks.
|
|
Safety data for the device.
Time Frame: 10 weeks.
|
Incidence of adverse events (AE), adverse device effects (ADE), serious adverse events (SAE), serious adverse device effects (SADE), and device deficiency (DD).
|
10 weeks.
|
|
Number of continence care product checks
Time Frame: 10 weeks.
|
From the study diary the number of checks of absorbing incontinence products is retrieved.
The last week of the 4 week baseline and last week of the 6 week intervention/control time period is to be compared.
Data is presented as average daily number of checks.
|
10 weeks.
|
|
Number of continence care product changes
Time Frame: 10 weeks.
|
From the study diary the number of changes of absorbing incontinence products is retrieved.
The last week of the 4 week baseline and last week of the 6 week intervention/control time period is to be compared.
Data is presented as average daily number of changes.
|
10 weeks.
|
|
Number of continence care toilet visits
Time Frame: 10 weeks.
|
From the study diary the number of toilet visits is retrieved.
The last week of the 4 week baseline and last week of the 6 week intervention/control time period is to be compared.
Data is presented as average daily number of toilet visits.
|
10 weeks.
|
|
Number of continence care clothing changes
Time Frame: 10 weeks.
|
From the study diary the number of clothing changes due to leakages is retrieved.
The last week of the 4 week baseline and last week of the 6 week intervention/control time period is to be compared.
Data is presented as average daily number of clothing changes.
|
10 weeks.
|
|
Number of continence care bed linen changes
Time Frame: 10 weeks.
|
From the study diary the number of bed linen changes due to leakages is retrieved.
The last week of the 4 week baseline and last week of the 6 week intervention/control time period is to be compared.
Data is presented as average daily number of linen changes.
|
10 weeks.
|
|
The time spent on continence care episodes
Time Frame: 10 weeks.
|
From the study diary the total time spent on continence care is retrieved.
The last week of the 4 week baseline and last week of the 6 week intervention/control time period is to be compared.
Data is presented as average daily time spent on continence care.
|
10 weeks.
|
|
Number of sleep interruptions due to continence care
Time Frame: 10 weeks.
|
From the study diary the number of sleep interruptions are retrieved.
The last week of the 4 week baseline and last week of the 6 week intervention/control time period is to be compared.
Data is presented as average daily number of interruptions.
|
10 weeks.
|
|
Time spent in a saturated continence care product
Time Frame: 10 weeks
|
Data from study diary used to retrieve the total hours that occur between an observed fully saturated product and the change of the saturated product.
The last week of the 4 week baseline and last week of the 6 week intervention/control time period is to be compared.
Data is presented as average daily time spent in the saturated product.
|
10 weeks
|
|
Number of unnecessary checks.
Time Frame: 10 weeks
|
Data from study diary used to retrieve the number of unnecessary checks/changes.
An unnecessary check/change is defined as, an activity line where a product check was performed but no product change occurred or an activity line where a product change occurred but neither a fully nor partially saturated product was indicated.
The last week of the 4 week baseline and last week of the 6 week intervention/control time period is to be compared.
Data is presented as average daily number of checks/changes.
|
10 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Adrian Wagg, MD, University of Alberta
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- WHEELS-ONE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.