Learning to Live With Non-severe Haemophilia

March 12, 2024 updated by: Haemnet

While the burden of standard treatment may be reduced through the use of gene therapy, converting those with severe haemophilia to a mild or moderate phenotype, the long-term sequelae of previous joint bleeds and associated limitations imposed on those with severe haemophilia may not translate to lessen the biomedical burden of living with a history of severe haemophilia.

We wish to explore these issues further in the Learning to Live study. The study will also seek to identify the ongoing support needs of those who transition to a milder bleeding phenotype.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Haemophilia is a rare congenital disorder caused by an inherited genetic defect which affects approximately one in every 5,000 males. Haemophilia A (factor VIII [FVIII] deficiency) occurs in 85% of cases with haemophilia B (factor IX [FIX] deficiency) making up the remainder of affected people. Three severities are reported: "severe" (factor activity is less than 1%), "moderate" (factor activity is 1-5% and "mild" (factor activity is 6-25%).

The aim of haemophilia treatment is to reduce the frequency of bleeds, and consequently morbidity and joint damage, in order to prevent future disability. Historically treatment has been replacement of the missing clotting factor when a bleed occurs (on-demand treatment) or regularly and intermittently (prophylactic treatment). With this in developed countries, life expectancy of persons with haemophilia, is expected to be close to normal. Treatment is burdensome for affected individuals and caregivers with treatment complications, (presence of inhibitors, pain, and arthropathy), psychological (stress and coping, anxiety and depression, stigmatisation and discrimination) and economic aspects.

Whilst those with mild haemophilia usually only experience bleeding with trauma or surgery and are less engaged with haemophilia care, the impact of living with mild haemophilia on quality of life is becoming more recognised and further research within this cohort of people is required.

The present day focus of treatment is on normalising individual's lives and reducing treatment burden by using innovative therapies to limit and/or eliminate bleeding episodes. This results in a cohort of individuals who are now living with a less severe phenotype of haemophilia, who may be less able to recognise and treat bleeds and for whom clinical follow up and outcomes will be considerably different to that of their predecessors.

A holistic approach to follow up is required, and should include patient relevant outcome. Living with mild haemophilia is still limiting and when bleeds occur the impact is not mild; many cannot self-infuse, do not recognise when to attend hospital and suffer pain and mobility issues.

This study, which has been co-created with a person with haemophilia, aims to explore the impact of these new treatments using mixed methods study. This includes quantitative data from patient reported outcome assessment (the PROBE validated haemophilia questionnaire) and through in depth qualitative interviews.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
165

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
    • Oxfordshire
      • Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom, OX3 9DU
        • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 100 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

People with haemophilia A or B either mild moderate or severe living in the UK.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Confirmed diagnosis of haemophilia A or B of any severity

Exclusion Criteria:

Diagnosis of any other bleeding disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To Identify and understand the differences between those with genetically mild/moderate haemophilia and those with previously severe haemophilia who have received phenotype altering treatment
Time Frame: 3 months
Survey using the validated PROBE questionnaire (using 7 point Likert scale)
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess the impact of phenotype altering treatments on those who receive them, and to compare this with those people with genetically mild/moderate haemophilia.
Time Frame: 3 months
Interview
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Haemnet

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
BioMarin Pharmaceutical

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 21, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 29, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 29, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 29, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 29, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 6, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 12, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • L2L

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Participant data will not be shared beyond the study group.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemophilia

Clinical Trials on Questionnaire and interview

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings