Three-dimensional Printed Hand Orthoses
Three-dimensional Printed Orthoses for Improving Daily Functioning in Chronic Hand Conditions
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105AZ
- Department of rehabilitation medicine Amsterdam UMC, location AMC
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Having a chronic hand-wrist condition due to an injury, or a musculoskeletal disorder, neuromuscular disorder, or neurological disorder;
- Minimum age of 18 years;
- Currently wearing a conventional custom manufactured hand orthosis (including a wrist-orthosis, wrist/thumb orthosis or thumb orthosis) for permanent use;
- Indicated for a new hand orthosis.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Already wearing a 3D-printed orthosis
- Wearing a silver wrist-orthosis, wrist/thumb orthosis or thumb orthosis
- Wearing an orthosis prescribed for a dysfunctional hand;
- Wearing a broken orthosis;
- Wearing the orthosis only at night;
- Worsening of disease;
- Insufficient mastery of the Dutch language.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 3D-printed hand orthoses
|
3D-printed hand orthoses (intervention) will be compared with custom-fabricated conventional orthoses (control condition at baseline)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline in performance of ADL on the custom short form of the Dutch-Flemish Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Upper extremity (DF-PROMIS-UE) at 4 months post-intervention.
Time Frame: 2 weeks pre-intervention; baseline; 1 month post-intervention; 4 months post-intervention
|
The short form DF-PROMIS-UE contains 25 items from the DF-PROMIS-UE 46-item bank.
Patients will rate how easily they can perform each activity on a 5-point scale, ranging from "without any difficulty" (score 4 or 5) to "unable to do" (score 1).
For each activity, the question was added whether participants use their orthosis for that specific activity.
The total score will be expressed as a T-score, which is a standardized score, with 50 representing the average score of the US general population and 10 being its standard deviation (SD).
Note.
For this study, the reliability of the DF-PROMIS-UE in persons with chronic hand conditions will be determined.
|
2 weeks pre-intervention; baseline; 1 month post-intervention; 4 months post-intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline in performance of ADL, overall hand function, pain, work, performance, aesthetics, and satisfaction on the Michigan Hand Questionnaire-Dutch Language version (MHQ-DLV) at 4 months post-intervention.
Time Frame: 2 weeks pre-intervention; baseline; 1 month post-intervention; 4 months post-intervention
|
MHQ-DVL domain items are scored from 0 - 100, in which 100 is the best possible ability, while for pain a score of 0 indicates no pain.
The total MHQ-DLV score is calculated as the mean of all 6 domains (after converting pain from a "best score of 0" scale to a "best score of 100" scale).
Note.
For this study, the reliability of the MHQ-DLV in persons with chronic hand conditions will be determined.
|
2 weeks pre-intervention; baseline; 1 month post-intervention; 4 months post-intervention
|
|
Change from baseline in satisfaction assessed with the Dutch version of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (D-QUEST) at 4 months post-intervention
Time Frame: Baseline; 1 month post-intervention; 4 months post-intervention
|
The D-QUEST assesses satisfaction with aspects related to the device and provided services.
For this study, only the device-part of the D-QUEST will be used, which comprises 8 questions about certain characteristics of the orthotic device, all scored on a 5-point scale (from 'not satisfied at all' to 'very satisfied'), with a total score ranging from 8-40 (with 40 being the best possible satisfaction score).
|
Baseline; 1 month post-intervention; 4 months post-intervention
|
|
Change in quality of life on the 5-dimension 5-level EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L) at 4 months post-intervention.
Time Frame: Baseline; 1 month post-intervention, 4 months post-intervention
|
The EQ-5D-5L contains five questions about mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety and depression scored on a 5-point scale indicating the degree of problems with each dimension and one question about experienced health scored on a 0-100 visual analogue scale.
|
Baseline; 1 month post-intervention, 4 months post-intervention
|
|
Production time of the orthosis (in minutes).
Time Frame: From start of the intervention up to delivery of the orthosis
|
For each step in manufacturing the orthosis until final delivery, time will be recorded (with a stopwatch).
|
From start of the intervention up to delivery of the orthosis
|
|
Production costs of the orthosis (in euro).
Time Frame: From start of the intervention up to delivery of the orthosis
|
Costs of the conventional orthoses will be retrospectively inventoried from the administration records of OIM.
Costs related to the manufacturing of the 3D-printed orthoses will be prospectively assessed.
|
From start of the intervention up to delivery of the orthosis
|
|
Change from baseline in personal goals at 4 month post-intervention.
Time Frame: Baseline; 1 month post-intervention, 4 months post-intervention
|
An in-house usability questionnaire will be used to inventory information on personal goals of the orthosis, and whether this goal has been achieved (scored on a 10-point-scale, ranging from 1: not achieved at all to 10: very well achieved).
|
Baseline; 1 month post-intervention, 4 months post-intervention
|
|
Change from baseline in orthosis use at 4 month post-intervention.
Time Frame: Baseline; 1 month post-intervention, 4 months post-intervention
|
An in-house usability questionnaire will be used to inventory how often the orthosis is used, classified in 5 categories; ranging from never until 6-7 days a week.
|
Baseline; 1 month post-intervention, 4 months post-intervention
|
|
Patient and therapist experiences with the 3D orthosis
Time Frame: 1 month post-treatment
|
Experiences of patients and health care providers with respect to the time window of the 3D intervention and satisfaction with the treatment process will be assessed with an in-house questionnaire, with items scored on a 5-point Likert scale.
|
1 month post-treatment
|
|
Number of visits for fabrication of the 3D orthosis
Time Frame: From start of the intervention up to delivery of the orthosis
|
The total number of visits for fabricating the 3D orthosis will be obtained from the administration records of OIM
|
From start of the intervention up to delivery of the orthosis
|
|
Change from baseline in satisfaction assessed with the Dutch version of the Client Satisfaction with Device (CSD) module of the Orthotics and Prosthetics User's Survey (OPUS) at 4 months post-intervention.
Time Frame: 2 weeks pre-intervention; baseline; 1 month post-intervention; 4 months post-intervention
|
The CSD contains 9 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ('strongly disagree') to 4 ('strongly agree), with a total score ranging from 0-36.
Since the CSD is not yet available in Dutch, the investigators will translate it into the Dutch language and assess its content validity, structural validity, and reliability in Dutch orthotic users.
|
2 weeks pre-intervention; baseline; 1 month post-intervention; 4 months post-intervention
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Adverse events
Time Frame: up to 4 months post intervention
|
The following adverse events reported by the participant or observed by the investigator or orthotist will be recorded; pressure sores, abrasions, pain due to the orthosis, and material damage of the orthosis.
|
up to 4 months post intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Prof. dr. Frans Nollet, MD PhD, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Oud TAM, Lazzari E, Gijsbers HJH, Gobbo M, Nollet F, Brehm MA. Effectiveness of 3D-printed orthoses for traumatic and chronic hand conditions: A scoping review. PLoS One. 2021 Nov 18;16(11):e0260271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260271. eCollection 2021.
- Oud T, Kerkum Y, de Groot P, Gijsbers H, Nollet F, Brehm MA. Production Time and User Satisfaction of 3-Dimensional Printed Orthoses For Chronic Hand Conditions Compared With Conventional Orthoses: A Prospective Case Series. J Rehabil Med Clin Commun. 2021 Feb 12;4:1000048. doi: 10.2340/20030711-1000048. eCollection 2021.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 10310012110002
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.