The REST Study for CGM Use in Older Adults With Insulin-treated Diabetes (REST)
Readiness, Education, and Sustainability for CGM Technology Adoption Model for Older Adults With Insulin-treated Diabetes
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
- Joslin Diabetes Center
-
-
New York
-
Syracuse, New York, United States, 13210
- SUNY Upstate Medical University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Older adults age ≥65 years
- T1D or T2D with duration longer than 1 year
- Insulin treatment includes: ≥3 insulin injections/day or on insulin pump therapy
- CGM naïve and/or CGM users (Dexcom G6) who are not meeting glycemic goals (per
CGM metrics):
- ≥4% hypoglycemia (sensor glucose ≤70 mg/dL) or
- time in range (70-180 mg/dL) TIR ≤40 %
- Willing to wear CGM Dexcom at all times while in the study
- Willing to use/carry personal or loaned smart phone device to use as Dexcom receiver for continual data upload to cloud
Exclusion Criteria:
- Life expectancy <1 year
- End-stage renal disease (eGFR< 30ml/min)
- On acetaminophen >4 gr/day due to interference with Dexcom G6 sensor readings
- On hydroxyurea therapy due to interference with Dexcom G6 sensor readings
- Impaired vision and hearing which would interfere with participation in remote video visits
- Use of hybrid closed-loop systems (this may require different and additional focused education and will not be addressed in this study).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Single Arm
|
Participants will enroll in a series of remote educational visits conducted by CDCES to assess readiness and barriers to CGM initiation and utilization, with the goal to sustain use of CGM Technology over time in older populations on complex insulin regimen.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The co-primary effectiveness outcomes
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
|
Change in time spent in hypoglycemia (sensor glucose <70 mg/dL and ii) Change in individualized Time in Range goal
|
Baseline to 6 months
|
|
The co-primary implementation outcomes
Time Frame: Baseline vs 6 months
|
Change in adoption of CGM by remote education (change in number of CGM users and ii) change in number of hours of CGM use per week
|
Baseline vs 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Visits to maintain CGM use
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Total time spent and the number of remote and in-person visits needed to initiate and maintain CGM use
|
6 months
|
|
Visits to maintain CGM use
Time Frame: Month 12
|
Total time spent and the number of remote and in-person visits needed to initiate and maintain CGM use
|
Month 12
|
|
Resource utilization
Time Frame: Baseline vs 6 months
|
Change in resource utilization (episodes of severe hypoglycemia, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations)
|
Baseline vs 6 months
|
|
Resource utilization
Time Frame: 6 months vs 12 months
|
Change in resource utilization (episodes of severe hypoglycemia, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations)
|
6 months vs 12 months
|
|
Time spent in hypoglycemia
Time Frame: 6 months vs 12 months
|
Change in time spent in hypoglycemia ( sensor glucose <70 mg/dL)
|
6 months vs 12 months
|
|
Cost effectivness
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Cost-effectiveness ratios to assess the economic aspects for REST model compared standard of care
|
6 months
|
|
Cost Effectivness
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Cost-effectiveness ratios to assess the economic aspects for REST model compared standard of care
|
12 months
|
|
Diabetes health related quality of life measures
Time Frame: Baseline vs 6 months
|
Change in quality of life measures (diabetes distress, hypoglycemia fear, EQ-5D)
|
Baseline vs 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00000174
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.